The Use of narrative evidence and explicit likelihood by decisionmakers varying in numeracy

Nathan Dieckmann, Paul Slovic, Ellen M. Peters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

87 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Decisionmakers are often presented with explicit likelihood assessments (e.g., there is a 10% chance that an attack will occur over the next three months) and supporting narrative evidence in forecasting and risk communication domains. Decisionmakers are thought to rely on both numerical and narrative information to the extent that they perceive the information to be diagnostic, accurate, and trustworthy. In two studies, we explored how lay decisionmakers varying in numeracy evaluated and used likelihood assessments and narrative evidence in forecasts. Overall, the less numerate reported higher risk and likelihood perceptions. In simple probabilistic forecasts without narrative evidence, decisionmakers at all levels of numeracy were able to use the stated likelihood information, although risk perceptions of the less numerate were more affected by likelihood format. When a forecast includes narrative evidence, decisionmakers were better able to use stated likelihood in a percentage as compared to frequency or verbal formats. The more numerate used stated likelihood more in their evaluations whereas the less numerate focused more on the narrative evidence. These results have important implications for risk analysts and forecasters who need to report the results of their analyses to decisionmakers. Decisionmakers varying in numerical ability may evaluate forecasts in different ways depending on the types of information they find easiest to evaluate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1473-1488
Number of pages16
JournalRisk Analysis
Volume29
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Risk perception
Communication

Keywords

  • Forecasting
  • Intelligence analysis
  • Numeracy
  • Risk communication
  • Risk perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology (medical)
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Cite this

The Use of narrative evidence and explicit likelihood by decisionmakers varying in numeracy. / Dieckmann, Nathan; Slovic, Paul; Peters, Ellen M.

In: Risk Analysis, Vol. 29, No. 10, 10.2009, p. 1473-1488.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dieckmann, Nathan ; Slovic, Paul ; Peters, Ellen M. / The Use of narrative evidence and explicit likelihood by decisionmakers varying in numeracy. In: Risk Analysis. 2009 ; Vol. 29, No. 10. pp. 1473-1488.
@article{93a9cbb8f6dc419fa749f2db502957a7,
title = "The Use of narrative evidence and explicit likelihood by decisionmakers varying in numeracy",
abstract = "Decisionmakers are often presented with explicit likelihood assessments (e.g., there is a 10{\%} chance that an attack will occur over the next three months) and supporting narrative evidence in forecasting and risk communication domains. Decisionmakers are thought to rely on both numerical and narrative information to the extent that they perceive the information to be diagnostic, accurate, and trustworthy. In two studies, we explored how lay decisionmakers varying in numeracy evaluated and used likelihood assessments and narrative evidence in forecasts. Overall, the less numerate reported higher risk and likelihood perceptions. In simple probabilistic forecasts without narrative evidence, decisionmakers at all levels of numeracy were able to use the stated likelihood information, although risk perceptions of the less numerate were more affected by likelihood format. When a forecast includes narrative evidence, decisionmakers were better able to use stated likelihood in a percentage as compared to frequency or verbal formats. The more numerate used stated likelihood more in their evaluations whereas the less numerate focused more on the narrative evidence. These results have important implications for risk analysts and forecasters who need to report the results of their analyses to decisionmakers. Decisionmakers varying in numerical ability may evaluate forecasts in different ways depending on the types of information they find easiest to evaluate.",
keywords = "Forecasting, Intelligence analysis, Numeracy, Risk communication, Risk perception",
author = "Nathan Dieckmann and Paul Slovic and Peters, {Ellen M.}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01279.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "1473--1488",
journal = "Risk Analysis",
issn = "0272-4332",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Use of narrative evidence and explicit likelihood by decisionmakers varying in numeracy

AU - Dieckmann, Nathan

AU - Slovic, Paul

AU - Peters, Ellen M.

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - Decisionmakers are often presented with explicit likelihood assessments (e.g., there is a 10% chance that an attack will occur over the next three months) and supporting narrative evidence in forecasting and risk communication domains. Decisionmakers are thought to rely on both numerical and narrative information to the extent that they perceive the information to be diagnostic, accurate, and trustworthy. In two studies, we explored how lay decisionmakers varying in numeracy evaluated and used likelihood assessments and narrative evidence in forecasts. Overall, the less numerate reported higher risk and likelihood perceptions. In simple probabilistic forecasts without narrative evidence, decisionmakers at all levels of numeracy were able to use the stated likelihood information, although risk perceptions of the less numerate were more affected by likelihood format. When a forecast includes narrative evidence, decisionmakers were better able to use stated likelihood in a percentage as compared to frequency or verbal formats. The more numerate used stated likelihood more in their evaluations whereas the less numerate focused more on the narrative evidence. These results have important implications for risk analysts and forecasters who need to report the results of their analyses to decisionmakers. Decisionmakers varying in numerical ability may evaluate forecasts in different ways depending on the types of information they find easiest to evaluate.

AB - Decisionmakers are often presented with explicit likelihood assessments (e.g., there is a 10% chance that an attack will occur over the next three months) and supporting narrative evidence in forecasting and risk communication domains. Decisionmakers are thought to rely on both numerical and narrative information to the extent that they perceive the information to be diagnostic, accurate, and trustworthy. In two studies, we explored how lay decisionmakers varying in numeracy evaluated and used likelihood assessments and narrative evidence in forecasts. Overall, the less numerate reported higher risk and likelihood perceptions. In simple probabilistic forecasts without narrative evidence, decisionmakers at all levels of numeracy were able to use the stated likelihood information, although risk perceptions of the less numerate were more affected by likelihood format. When a forecast includes narrative evidence, decisionmakers were better able to use stated likelihood in a percentage as compared to frequency or verbal formats. The more numerate used stated likelihood more in their evaluations whereas the less numerate focused more on the narrative evidence. These results have important implications for risk analysts and forecasters who need to report the results of their analyses to decisionmakers. Decisionmakers varying in numerical ability may evaluate forecasts in different ways depending on the types of information they find easiest to evaluate.

KW - Forecasting

KW - Intelligence analysis

KW - Numeracy

KW - Risk communication

KW - Risk perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349317251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349317251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01279.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01279.x

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 1473

EP - 1488

JO - Risk Analysis

JF - Risk Analysis

SN - 0272-4332

IS - 10

ER -