The United Hospital Fund meeting on evaluating health information exchange

George Hripcsak, Rainu Kaushal, Kevin B. Johnson, Joan Ash, David W. Bates, Rachel Block, Mark E. Frisse, Lisa M. Kern, Janet Marchibroda, J. Marc Overhage, Adam B. Wilcox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Health information exchange (HIE) projects are sweeping the nation, with hopes that they will lead to high quality, efficient care, yet the literature on their measured benefits remains sparse. To the degree that the field adopts a common set of evaluation strategies, duplicate work can be reduced and meta-analysis will be easier. The United Hospital Fund sponsored a meeting to address HIE evaluation. HIE projects are diverse with many kinds of effects. Assessment of the operation of the HIE infrastructure and of usage should be done for all projects. The immediate business case must be demonstrated for the stakeholders. Rigorous evaluation of the effect on quality may only need to be done for a handful of projects, with simpler process studies elsewhere. Unintended consequences should be monitored. A comprehensive study of return on investment requires an assessment of all effects. Program evaluation across several projects may help set future policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Biomedical Informatics
Volume40
Issue number6 SUPPL.
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2007

Fingerprint

Health
Quality of Health Care
Program Evaluation
Meta-Analysis
Health Information Exchange
Industry

Keywords

  • Evaluation
  • Health information exchange
  • Regional health information organization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Health Informatics
  • Computer Science (miscellaneous)
  • Catalysis

Cite this

Hripcsak, G., Kaushal, R., Johnson, K. B., Ash, J., Bates, D. W., Block, R., ... Wilcox, A. B. (2007). The United Hospital Fund meeting on evaluating health information exchange. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 40(6 SUPPL.). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2007.08.002

The United Hospital Fund meeting on evaluating health information exchange. / Hripcsak, George; Kaushal, Rainu; Johnson, Kevin B.; Ash, Joan; Bates, David W.; Block, Rachel; Frisse, Mark E.; Kern, Lisa M.; Marchibroda, Janet; Overhage, J. Marc; Wilcox, Adam B.

In: Journal of Biomedical Informatics, Vol. 40, No. 6 SUPPL., 12.2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hripcsak, G, Kaushal, R, Johnson, KB, Ash, J, Bates, DW, Block, R, Frisse, ME, Kern, LM, Marchibroda, J, Overhage, JM & Wilcox, AB 2007, 'The United Hospital Fund meeting on evaluating health information exchange', Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 40, no. 6 SUPPL.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2007.08.002
Hripcsak, George ; Kaushal, Rainu ; Johnson, Kevin B. ; Ash, Joan ; Bates, David W. ; Block, Rachel ; Frisse, Mark E. ; Kern, Lisa M. ; Marchibroda, Janet ; Overhage, J. Marc ; Wilcox, Adam B. / The United Hospital Fund meeting on evaluating health information exchange. In: Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2007 ; Vol. 40, No. 6 SUPPL.
@article{7a03d30917b84a0eae003f78fde9c8ff,
title = "The United Hospital Fund meeting on evaluating health information exchange",
abstract = "Health information exchange (HIE) projects are sweeping the nation, with hopes that they will lead to high quality, efficient care, yet the literature on their measured benefits remains sparse. To the degree that the field adopts a common set of evaluation strategies, duplicate work can be reduced and meta-analysis will be easier. The United Hospital Fund sponsored a meeting to address HIE evaluation. HIE projects are diverse with many kinds of effects. Assessment of the operation of the HIE infrastructure and of usage should be done for all projects. The immediate business case must be demonstrated for the stakeholders. Rigorous evaluation of the effect on quality may only need to be done for a handful of projects, with simpler process studies elsewhere. Unintended consequences should be monitored. A comprehensive study of return on investment requires an assessment of all effects. Program evaluation across several projects may help set future policy.",
keywords = "Evaluation, Health information exchange, Regional health information organization",
author = "George Hripcsak and Rainu Kaushal and Johnson, {Kevin B.} and Joan Ash and Bates, {David W.} and Rachel Block and Frisse, {Mark E.} and Kern, {Lisa M.} and Janet Marchibroda and Overhage, {J. Marc} and Wilcox, {Adam B.}",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbi.2007.08.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
journal = "Journal of Biomedical Informatics",
issn = "1532-0464",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "6 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The United Hospital Fund meeting on evaluating health information exchange

AU - Hripcsak, George

AU - Kaushal, Rainu

AU - Johnson, Kevin B.

AU - Ash, Joan

AU - Bates, David W.

AU - Block, Rachel

AU - Frisse, Mark E.

AU - Kern, Lisa M.

AU - Marchibroda, Janet

AU - Overhage, J. Marc

AU - Wilcox, Adam B.

PY - 2007/12

Y1 - 2007/12

N2 - Health information exchange (HIE) projects are sweeping the nation, with hopes that they will lead to high quality, efficient care, yet the literature on their measured benefits remains sparse. To the degree that the field adopts a common set of evaluation strategies, duplicate work can be reduced and meta-analysis will be easier. The United Hospital Fund sponsored a meeting to address HIE evaluation. HIE projects are diverse with many kinds of effects. Assessment of the operation of the HIE infrastructure and of usage should be done for all projects. The immediate business case must be demonstrated for the stakeholders. Rigorous evaluation of the effect on quality may only need to be done for a handful of projects, with simpler process studies elsewhere. Unintended consequences should be monitored. A comprehensive study of return on investment requires an assessment of all effects. Program evaluation across several projects may help set future policy.

AB - Health information exchange (HIE) projects are sweeping the nation, with hopes that they will lead to high quality, efficient care, yet the literature on their measured benefits remains sparse. To the degree that the field adopts a common set of evaluation strategies, duplicate work can be reduced and meta-analysis will be easier. The United Hospital Fund sponsored a meeting to address HIE evaluation. HIE projects are diverse with many kinds of effects. Assessment of the operation of the HIE infrastructure and of usage should be done for all projects. The immediate business case must be demonstrated for the stakeholders. Rigorous evaluation of the effect on quality may only need to be done for a handful of projects, with simpler process studies elsewhere. Unintended consequences should be monitored. A comprehensive study of return on investment requires an assessment of all effects. Program evaluation across several projects may help set future policy.

KW - Evaluation

KW - Health information exchange

KW - Regional health information organization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36048976421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36048976421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.08.002

M3 - Article

VL - 40

JO - Journal of Biomedical Informatics

JF - Journal of Biomedical Informatics

SN - 1532-0464

IS - 6 SUPPL.

ER -