The unintended consequences of computerized provider order entry: Findings from a mixed methods exploration

Joan Ash, Dean F. Sittig, Richard Dykstra, Emily Campbell, Kenneth Guappone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

136 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To describe the foci, activities, methods, and results of a 4-year research project identifying the unintended consequences of computerized provider order entry (CPOE). Methods: Using a mixed methods approach, we identified and categorized into nine types 380 examples of the unintended consequences of CPOE gleaned from fieldwork data and a conference of experts. We then conducted a national survey in the U.S.A. to discover how hospitals with varying levels of infusion, a measure of CPOE sophistication, recognize and deal with unintended consequences. The research team, with assistance from experts, identified strategies for managing the nine types of unintended adverse consequences and developed and disseminated tools for CPOE implementers to help in addressing these consequences. Results: Hospitals reported that levels of infusion are quite high and that these types of unintended consequences are common. Strategies for avoiding or managing the unintended consequences are similar to best practices for CPOE success published in the literature. Conclusion: Development of a taxonomy of types of unintended adverse consequences of CPOE using qualitative methods allowed us to craft a national survey and discover how widespread these consequences are. Using mixed methods, we were able to structure an approach for addressing the skillful management of unintended consequences as well.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)69-76
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume78
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2009

Fingerprint

Medical Order Entry Systems
Practice Guidelines
Research

Keywords

  • Attitude to computers
  • Hospital information systems
  • Physician order entry
  • User-computer interface

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

The unintended consequences of computerized provider order entry : Findings from a mixed methods exploration. / Ash, Joan; Sittig, Dean F.; Dykstra, Richard; Campbell, Emily; Guappone, Kenneth.

In: International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol. 78, No. SUPPL. 1, 04.2009, p. 69-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ash, Joan ; Sittig, Dean F. ; Dykstra, Richard ; Campbell, Emily ; Guappone, Kenneth. / The unintended consequences of computerized provider order entry : Findings from a mixed methods exploration. In: International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2009 ; Vol. 78, No. SUPPL. 1. pp. 69-76.
@article{fc1806a92a5f4a2e866013375a675a0b,
title = "The unintended consequences of computerized provider order entry: Findings from a mixed methods exploration",
abstract = "Objective: To describe the foci, activities, methods, and results of a 4-year research project identifying the unintended consequences of computerized provider order entry (CPOE). Methods: Using a mixed methods approach, we identified and categorized into nine types 380 examples of the unintended consequences of CPOE gleaned from fieldwork data and a conference of experts. We then conducted a national survey in the U.S.A. to discover how hospitals with varying levels of infusion, a measure of CPOE sophistication, recognize and deal with unintended consequences. The research team, with assistance from experts, identified strategies for managing the nine types of unintended adverse consequences and developed and disseminated tools for CPOE implementers to help in addressing these consequences. Results: Hospitals reported that levels of infusion are quite high and that these types of unintended consequences are common. Strategies for avoiding or managing the unintended consequences are similar to best practices for CPOE success published in the literature. Conclusion: Development of a taxonomy of types of unintended adverse consequences of CPOE using qualitative methods allowed us to craft a national survey and discover how widespread these consequences are. Using mixed methods, we were able to structure an approach for addressing the skillful management of unintended consequences as well.",
keywords = "Attitude to computers, Hospital information systems, Physician order entry, User-computer interface",
author = "Joan Ash and Sittig, {Dean F.} and Richard Dykstra and Emily Campbell and Kenneth Guappone",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.07.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "69--76",
journal = "International Journal of Medical Informatics",
issn = "1386-5056",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The unintended consequences of computerized provider order entry

T2 - Findings from a mixed methods exploration

AU - Ash, Joan

AU - Sittig, Dean F.

AU - Dykstra, Richard

AU - Campbell, Emily

AU - Guappone, Kenneth

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - Objective: To describe the foci, activities, methods, and results of a 4-year research project identifying the unintended consequences of computerized provider order entry (CPOE). Methods: Using a mixed methods approach, we identified and categorized into nine types 380 examples of the unintended consequences of CPOE gleaned from fieldwork data and a conference of experts. We then conducted a national survey in the U.S.A. to discover how hospitals with varying levels of infusion, a measure of CPOE sophistication, recognize and deal with unintended consequences. The research team, with assistance from experts, identified strategies for managing the nine types of unintended adverse consequences and developed and disseminated tools for CPOE implementers to help in addressing these consequences. Results: Hospitals reported that levels of infusion are quite high and that these types of unintended consequences are common. Strategies for avoiding or managing the unintended consequences are similar to best practices for CPOE success published in the literature. Conclusion: Development of a taxonomy of types of unintended adverse consequences of CPOE using qualitative methods allowed us to craft a national survey and discover how widespread these consequences are. Using mixed methods, we were able to structure an approach for addressing the skillful management of unintended consequences as well.

AB - Objective: To describe the foci, activities, methods, and results of a 4-year research project identifying the unintended consequences of computerized provider order entry (CPOE). Methods: Using a mixed methods approach, we identified and categorized into nine types 380 examples of the unintended consequences of CPOE gleaned from fieldwork data and a conference of experts. We then conducted a national survey in the U.S.A. to discover how hospitals with varying levels of infusion, a measure of CPOE sophistication, recognize and deal with unintended consequences. The research team, with assistance from experts, identified strategies for managing the nine types of unintended adverse consequences and developed and disseminated tools for CPOE implementers to help in addressing these consequences. Results: Hospitals reported that levels of infusion are quite high and that these types of unintended consequences are common. Strategies for avoiding or managing the unintended consequences are similar to best practices for CPOE success published in the literature. Conclusion: Development of a taxonomy of types of unintended adverse consequences of CPOE using qualitative methods allowed us to craft a national survey and discover how widespread these consequences are. Using mixed methods, we were able to structure an approach for addressing the skillful management of unintended consequences as well.

KW - Attitude to computers

KW - Hospital information systems

KW - Physician order entry

KW - User-computer interface

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62749180291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62749180291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.07.015

DO - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.07.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 18786852

AN - SCOPUS:62749180291

VL - 78

SP - 69

EP - 76

JO - International Journal of Medical Informatics

JF - International Journal of Medical Informatics

SN - 1386-5056

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -