The testing process in family medicine: Problems, solutions and barriers as seen by physicians and their staff: A study of the American Academy of Family Physicians' National Research Network

Nancy C. Elder, Deborah Graham, Elias Brandt, Susan Dovey, Robert Phillips, James Ledwith, John Hickner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:: Family physicians order laboratory, imaging, and diagnostic tests on a significant portion of their patients. Problems with the testing process, including the steps of ordering tests, tracking and responding to results, notifying patients, and following up with patients, and potential improvement strategies have not been well described. Our objective is to assess problems with the testing process, potential solutions, and barriers to implementation of solutions, as perceived by family physicians and their office staff. METHODS:: Focus groups were held with physicians and staff at 8 geographically diverse practices of the American Academy of Family Physicians' National Research Network who were participating in an errors-reporting study. Participants were asked about testing process errors, problems, and potential improvements. Analysis was by the editing method. RESULTS:: A total of 139 people participated in 18 focus groups. Participants identified problems with all steps in the testing process, and also noted that filing and charting problems existed in most steps in the testing process. Underlying contributing factors included not following procedures, inadequate systems, lack of standardization, and communication problems. Perceived barriers to improvements were both cultural (leadership and staff support, tension for change) and process-related (costs, staff and work environment, external support). Desired improvements included technology, more staffing, and improved systems. CONCLUSIONS:: Family physicians and their staff easily identified errors and their contributing factors in their testing processes. Desired improvements tended to be quick fixes that may not adequately address the identified errors and barriers to improved safety in the testing process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)25-32
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of patient safety
Volume2
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Medical errors
  • Patient safety
  • Primary care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The testing process in family medicine: Problems, solutions and barriers as seen by physicians and their staff: A study of the American Academy of Family Physicians' National Research Network'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this