The safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to midlevel providers

A systematic review

Maria Rodriguez, Cristin Gordon-Maclean

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Task sharing is an important strategy for increasing access to modern, effective contraception for women and reducing unmet need for family planning. Objective The objective was to identify evidence for the safety, efficacy or acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to midlevel providers. Search strategy We searched PubMed, Cochrane and Popline for articles in all languages using the following key words: task sharing, tubal sterilization, midlevel providers, task shifting. Selection criteria All studies reporting on any measure of safety, efficacy or acceptability of tubal sterilization performed by any cadre of midlevel providers. Data collection and analysis Data were independently abstracted by two authors and graded using the United States Preventive Services Task Force rating for evidence quality. Heterogeneity of outcome measures precluded a meta-analysis. Main results Nine studies of fair to poor quality reported on safety and acceptability outcomes. Generalizability of findings is limited by inadequate sample size and lack of statistical comparisons. No study reported on long-term efficacy outcomes. Conclusions Well-designed clinical trials, of adequate sample size, are urgently needed to establish the safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to midlevel providers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)504-511
Number of pages8
JournalContraception
Volume89
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Tubal Sterilization
Safety
Sample Size
Family Planning Services
Advisory Committees
Contraception
PubMed
Patient Selection
Meta-Analysis
Language
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Clinical Trials

Keywords

  • Female sterilization
  • Midlevel provider
  • Task sharing
  • Task shifting
  • Tubal ligation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to midlevel providers : A systematic review. / Rodriguez, Maria; Gordon-Maclean, Cristin.

In: Contraception, Vol. 89, No. 6, 2014, p. 504-511.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{df61a7692fed408d96a483ad21bad431,
title = "The safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to midlevel providers: A systematic review",
abstract = "Background Task sharing is an important strategy for increasing access to modern, effective contraception for women and reducing unmet need for family planning. Objective The objective was to identify evidence for the safety, efficacy or acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to midlevel providers. Search strategy We searched PubMed, Cochrane and Popline for articles in all languages using the following key words: task sharing, tubal sterilization, midlevel providers, task shifting. Selection criteria All studies reporting on any measure of safety, efficacy or acceptability of tubal sterilization performed by any cadre of midlevel providers. Data collection and analysis Data were independently abstracted by two authors and graded using the United States Preventive Services Task Force rating for evidence quality. Heterogeneity of outcome measures precluded a meta-analysis. Main results Nine studies of fair to poor quality reported on safety and acceptability outcomes. Generalizability of findings is limited by inadequate sample size and lack of statistical comparisons. No study reported on long-term efficacy outcomes. Conclusions Well-designed clinical trials, of adequate sample size, are urgently needed to establish the safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to midlevel providers.",
keywords = "Female sterilization, Midlevel provider, Task sharing, Task shifting, Tubal ligation",
author = "Maria Rodriguez and Cristin Gordon-Maclean",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.contraception.2014.01.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "504--511",
journal = "Contraception",
issn = "0010-7824",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to midlevel providers

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Rodriguez, Maria

AU - Gordon-Maclean, Cristin

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background Task sharing is an important strategy for increasing access to modern, effective contraception for women and reducing unmet need for family planning. Objective The objective was to identify evidence for the safety, efficacy or acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to midlevel providers. Search strategy We searched PubMed, Cochrane and Popline for articles in all languages using the following key words: task sharing, tubal sterilization, midlevel providers, task shifting. Selection criteria All studies reporting on any measure of safety, efficacy or acceptability of tubal sterilization performed by any cadre of midlevel providers. Data collection and analysis Data were independently abstracted by two authors and graded using the United States Preventive Services Task Force rating for evidence quality. Heterogeneity of outcome measures precluded a meta-analysis. Main results Nine studies of fair to poor quality reported on safety and acceptability outcomes. Generalizability of findings is limited by inadequate sample size and lack of statistical comparisons. No study reported on long-term efficacy outcomes. Conclusions Well-designed clinical trials, of adequate sample size, are urgently needed to establish the safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to midlevel providers.

AB - Background Task sharing is an important strategy for increasing access to modern, effective contraception for women and reducing unmet need for family planning. Objective The objective was to identify evidence for the safety, efficacy or acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to midlevel providers. Search strategy We searched PubMed, Cochrane and Popline for articles in all languages using the following key words: task sharing, tubal sterilization, midlevel providers, task shifting. Selection criteria All studies reporting on any measure of safety, efficacy or acceptability of tubal sterilization performed by any cadre of midlevel providers. Data collection and analysis Data were independently abstracted by two authors and graded using the United States Preventive Services Task Force rating for evidence quality. Heterogeneity of outcome measures precluded a meta-analysis. Main results Nine studies of fair to poor quality reported on safety and acceptability outcomes. Generalizability of findings is limited by inadequate sample size and lack of statistical comparisons. No study reported on long-term efficacy outcomes. Conclusions Well-designed clinical trials, of adequate sample size, are urgently needed to establish the safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to midlevel providers.

KW - Female sterilization

KW - Midlevel provider

KW - Task sharing

KW - Task shifting

KW - Tubal ligation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901616235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901616235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.01.008

DO - 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.01.008

M3 - Article

VL - 89

SP - 504

EP - 511

JO - Contraception

JF - Contraception

SN - 0010-7824

IS - 6

ER -