The role of the principle of double effect in ethics education at US medical schools and its potential impact on pain management at the end of life

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Because opioids can suppress respiratory drive, the principle of double effect (PDE) has been used to justify their use for terminally ill patients. Recent studies, however, suggest that the risk of respiratory depression in typical end-of-life (EOL) situations may be overstated and that heightened concern for this rare occurrence can lead to inadequate treatment of pain. The purpose of this study is to examine the role of the PDE in medical school ethics education, with specific reference to its potential impact on pain management at EOL. Method: After obtaining institutional review board approval, an electronic survey was sent to ethics educators at every allopathic medical school in the USA. Results: One-third of ethics educators felt that opioids were 'likely' to cause significant respiratory depression that could hasten death. Educators' opinions of opioid effects did not influence their view of the relevance of the PDE, with approximately 70% deeming it relevant to EOL care. Only 15% of ethics educators believed that associating the PDE with opioid use might discourage clinicians from optimally treating pain, out of concern for respiratory depression. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that a significant minority of ethics educators believe, contrary to current evidence, that opioids are 'likely' to cause significant respiratory depression that could hasten death in terminally ill patients. Yet, many of those who do not feel this is likely still rely on the PDE to justify this possibility, potentially (and unknowingly) contributing to clinical misperceptions and underutilisation of opioids at EOL.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)174-178
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Double Effect Principle
Pain Management
Medical Schools
Ethics
Opioid Analgesics
pain
moral philosophy
Education
Respiratory Insufficiency
educator
management
school
Terminally Ill
education
death
Pain
Medical Ethics
Terminal Care
cause
Research Ethics Committees

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

@article{2846070bea1a4617bf47bb96862ef6be,
title = "The role of the principle of double effect in ethics education at US medical schools and its potential impact on pain management at the end of life",
abstract = "Background: Because opioids can suppress respiratory drive, the principle of double effect (PDE) has been used to justify their use for terminally ill patients. Recent studies, however, suggest that the risk of respiratory depression in typical end-of-life (EOL) situations may be overstated and that heightened concern for this rare occurrence can lead to inadequate treatment of pain. The purpose of this study is to examine the role of the PDE in medical school ethics education, with specific reference to its potential impact on pain management at EOL. Method: After obtaining institutional review board approval, an electronic survey was sent to ethics educators at every allopathic medical school in the USA. Results: One-third of ethics educators felt that opioids were 'likely' to cause significant respiratory depression that could hasten death. Educators' opinions of opioid effects did not influence their view of the relevance of the PDE, with approximately 70{\%} deeming it relevant to EOL care. Only 15{\%} of ethics educators believed that associating the PDE with opioid use might discourage clinicians from optimally treating pain, out of concern for respiratory depression. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that a significant minority of ethics educators believe, contrary to current evidence, that opioids are 'likely' to cause significant respiratory depression that could hasten death in terminally ill patients. Yet, many of those who do not feel this is likely still rely on the PDE to justify this possibility, potentially (and unknowingly) contributing to clinical misperceptions and underutilisation of opioids at EOL.",
author = "Robert Macauley",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/medethics-2011-100105",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "174--178",
journal = "Journal of Medical Ethics",
issn = "0306-6800",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of the principle of double effect in ethics education at US medical schools and its potential impact on pain management at the end of life

AU - Macauley, Robert

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - Background: Because opioids can suppress respiratory drive, the principle of double effect (PDE) has been used to justify their use for terminally ill patients. Recent studies, however, suggest that the risk of respiratory depression in typical end-of-life (EOL) situations may be overstated and that heightened concern for this rare occurrence can lead to inadequate treatment of pain. The purpose of this study is to examine the role of the PDE in medical school ethics education, with specific reference to its potential impact on pain management at EOL. Method: After obtaining institutional review board approval, an electronic survey was sent to ethics educators at every allopathic medical school in the USA. Results: One-third of ethics educators felt that opioids were 'likely' to cause significant respiratory depression that could hasten death. Educators' opinions of opioid effects did not influence their view of the relevance of the PDE, with approximately 70% deeming it relevant to EOL care. Only 15% of ethics educators believed that associating the PDE with opioid use might discourage clinicians from optimally treating pain, out of concern for respiratory depression. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that a significant minority of ethics educators believe, contrary to current evidence, that opioids are 'likely' to cause significant respiratory depression that could hasten death in terminally ill patients. Yet, many of those who do not feel this is likely still rely on the PDE to justify this possibility, potentially (and unknowingly) contributing to clinical misperceptions and underutilisation of opioids at EOL.

AB - Background: Because opioids can suppress respiratory drive, the principle of double effect (PDE) has been used to justify their use for terminally ill patients. Recent studies, however, suggest that the risk of respiratory depression in typical end-of-life (EOL) situations may be overstated and that heightened concern for this rare occurrence can lead to inadequate treatment of pain. The purpose of this study is to examine the role of the PDE in medical school ethics education, with specific reference to its potential impact on pain management at EOL. Method: After obtaining institutional review board approval, an electronic survey was sent to ethics educators at every allopathic medical school in the USA. Results: One-third of ethics educators felt that opioids were 'likely' to cause significant respiratory depression that could hasten death. Educators' opinions of opioid effects did not influence their view of the relevance of the PDE, with approximately 70% deeming it relevant to EOL care. Only 15% of ethics educators believed that associating the PDE with opioid use might discourage clinicians from optimally treating pain, out of concern for respiratory depression. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that a significant minority of ethics educators believe, contrary to current evidence, that opioids are 'likely' to cause significant respiratory depression that could hasten death in terminally ill patients. Yet, many of those who do not feel this is likely still rely on the PDE to justify this possibility, potentially (and unknowingly) contributing to clinical misperceptions and underutilisation of opioids at EOL.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860486011&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860486011&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/medethics-2011-100105

DO - 10.1136/medethics-2011-100105

M3 - Article

C2 - 21947800

AN - SCOPUS:84860486011

VL - 38

SP - 174

EP - 178

JO - Journal of Medical Ethics

JF - Journal of Medical Ethics

SN - 0306-6800

IS - 3

ER -