The role of the intracarotid amobarbital procedure in evaluation of patients for epilepsy surgery

David Spencer, Martha J. Morrell, Michael W. Risinger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the role of the intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP) in the presurgical evaluation of patients with medically refractory localization-related epilepsy. Methods: We retrospectively studied 111 patients who underwent cortical resective surgery at our center between 1991 and 1996. In patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE), a presurgical determination of the epileptogenic zone was compared with localization based on IAP memory asymmetry scores, and with ultimate localization after resective surgery. In patients with neocortical or mesial frontal epilepsy, the IAP was evaluated for evidence of unilateral or bilateral poor memory performance. Results: Of 68 patients with mTLE localized by noninvasive tests, 60 had concordant lateralized memory deficits on IAP. Eight patients had lateralized memory deficits on IAP that were discordant with noninvasive tests and with localization as determined by surgical outcome. All 11 mTLE patients requiring invasive EEG monitoring were correctly lateralized by IAP, including one patient in whom the noninvasive evaluation otherwise provided false lateralization. Of 32 patients with neocortical or mesial frontal lobe epilepsy, 21 displayed memory deficits on IAP. Of 10 patients with bilateral deficits, five had mesial frontal lobe epilepsy. In 13 patients with lateralized memory deficits, seven underwent electrode implantation in the mesial temporal lobe, and four ultimately underwent resection of an epileptogenic mesial temporal lobe in addition to a neocortical resection. Conclusions: In patients with mTLE, lateralized memory deficits on IAP usually confirm localization provided by noninvasive tests. However, in mTLE not well lateralized by the noninvasive evaluation, and in neocortical or mesial frontal epilepsy, the IAP may provide information regarding localization that ultimately alters surgical management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)320-325
Number of pages6
JournalEpilepsia
Volume41
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Amobarbital
Epilepsy
Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
Memory Disorders
Frontal Lobe Epilepsy
Temporal Lobe
Partial Epilepsy
Electroencephalography

Keywords

  • Epilepsy
  • Epilepsy surgery
  • Intracarotid amobarbital procedure
  • Neuropsychology
  • Wada

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

The role of the intracarotid amobarbital procedure in evaluation of patients for epilepsy surgery. / Spencer, David; Morrell, Martha J.; Risinger, Michael W.

In: Epilepsia, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2000, p. 320-325.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Spencer, David ; Morrell, Martha J. ; Risinger, Michael W. / The role of the intracarotid amobarbital procedure in evaluation of patients for epilepsy surgery. In: Epilepsia. 2000 ; Vol. 41, No. 3. pp. 320-325.
@article{fdb5fbdd543a43989c8b231e1c9306c0,
title = "The role of the intracarotid amobarbital procedure in evaluation of patients for epilepsy surgery",
abstract = "Purpose: To examine the role of the intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP) in the presurgical evaluation of patients with medically refractory localization-related epilepsy. Methods: We retrospectively studied 111 patients who underwent cortical resective surgery at our center between 1991 and 1996. In patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE), a presurgical determination of the epileptogenic zone was compared with localization based on IAP memory asymmetry scores, and with ultimate localization after resective surgery. In patients with neocortical or mesial frontal epilepsy, the IAP was evaluated for evidence of unilateral or bilateral poor memory performance. Results: Of 68 patients with mTLE localized by noninvasive tests, 60 had concordant lateralized memory deficits on IAP. Eight patients had lateralized memory deficits on IAP that were discordant with noninvasive tests and with localization as determined by surgical outcome. All 11 mTLE patients requiring invasive EEG monitoring were correctly lateralized by IAP, including one patient in whom the noninvasive evaluation otherwise provided false lateralization. Of 32 patients with neocortical or mesial frontal lobe epilepsy, 21 displayed memory deficits on IAP. Of 10 patients with bilateral deficits, five had mesial frontal lobe epilepsy. In 13 patients with lateralized memory deficits, seven underwent electrode implantation in the mesial temporal lobe, and four ultimately underwent resection of an epileptogenic mesial temporal lobe in addition to a neocortical resection. Conclusions: In patients with mTLE, lateralized memory deficits on IAP usually confirm localization provided by noninvasive tests. However, in mTLE not well lateralized by the noninvasive evaluation, and in neocortical or mesial frontal epilepsy, the IAP may provide information regarding localization that ultimately alters surgical management.",
keywords = "Epilepsy, Epilepsy surgery, Intracarotid amobarbital procedure, Neuropsychology, Wada",
author = "David Spencer and Morrell, {Martha J.} and Risinger, {Michael W.}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "320--325",
journal = "Epilepsia",
issn = "0013-9580",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of the intracarotid amobarbital procedure in evaluation of patients for epilepsy surgery

AU - Spencer, David

AU - Morrell, Martha J.

AU - Risinger, Michael W.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Purpose: To examine the role of the intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP) in the presurgical evaluation of patients with medically refractory localization-related epilepsy. Methods: We retrospectively studied 111 patients who underwent cortical resective surgery at our center between 1991 and 1996. In patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE), a presurgical determination of the epileptogenic zone was compared with localization based on IAP memory asymmetry scores, and with ultimate localization after resective surgery. In patients with neocortical or mesial frontal epilepsy, the IAP was evaluated for evidence of unilateral or bilateral poor memory performance. Results: Of 68 patients with mTLE localized by noninvasive tests, 60 had concordant lateralized memory deficits on IAP. Eight patients had lateralized memory deficits on IAP that were discordant with noninvasive tests and with localization as determined by surgical outcome. All 11 mTLE patients requiring invasive EEG monitoring were correctly lateralized by IAP, including one patient in whom the noninvasive evaluation otherwise provided false lateralization. Of 32 patients with neocortical or mesial frontal lobe epilepsy, 21 displayed memory deficits on IAP. Of 10 patients with bilateral deficits, five had mesial frontal lobe epilepsy. In 13 patients with lateralized memory deficits, seven underwent electrode implantation in the mesial temporal lobe, and four ultimately underwent resection of an epileptogenic mesial temporal lobe in addition to a neocortical resection. Conclusions: In patients with mTLE, lateralized memory deficits on IAP usually confirm localization provided by noninvasive tests. However, in mTLE not well lateralized by the noninvasive evaluation, and in neocortical or mesial frontal epilepsy, the IAP may provide information regarding localization that ultimately alters surgical management.

AB - Purpose: To examine the role of the intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP) in the presurgical evaluation of patients with medically refractory localization-related epilepsy. Methods: We retrospectively studied 111 patients who underwent cortical resective surgery at our center between 1991 and 1996. In patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE), a presurgical determination of the epileptogenic zone was compared with localization based on IAP memory asymmetry scores, and with ultimate localization after resective surgery. In patients with neocortical or mesial frontal epilepsy, the IAP was evaluated for evidence of unilateral or bilateral poor memory performance. Results: Of 68 patients with mTLE localized by noninvasive tests, 60 had concordant lateralized memory deficits on IAP. Eight patients had lateralized memory deficits on IAP that were discordant with noninvasive tests and with localization as determined by surgical outcome. All 11 mTLE patients requiring invasive EEG monitoring were correctly lateralized by IAP, including one patient in whom the noninvasive evaluation otherwise provided false lateralization. Of 32 patients with neocortical or mesial frontal lobe epilepsy, 21 displayed memory deficits on IAP. Of 10 patients with bilateral deficits, five had mesial frontal lobe epilepsy. In 13 patients with lateralized memory deficits, seven underwent electrode implantation in the mesial temporal lobe, and four ultimately underwent resection of an epileptogenic mesial temporal lobe in addition to a neocortical resection. Conclusions: In patients with mTLE, lateralized memory deficits on IAP usually confirm localization provided by noninvasive tests. However, in mTLE not well lateralized by the noninvasive evaluation, and in neocortical or mesial frontal epilepsy, the IAP may provide information regarding localization that ultimately alters surgical management.

KW - Epilepsy

KW - Epilepsy surgery

KW - Intracarotid amobarbital procedure

KW - Neuropsychology

KW - Wada

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034007896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034007896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 320

EP - 325

JO - Epilepsia

JF - Epilepsia

SN - 0013-9580

IS - 3

ER -