The role of perioperative chewing gum on gastric fluid volume and gastric pH: A meta-analysis

Jean Pierre P Ouanes, Mark C. Bicket, Brandon Togioka, Vicente Garcia Tomas, Christopher L. Wu, Jamie D. Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study objective To determine if preoperative gum chewing affects gastric pH and gastric fluid volume. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Data sources included Cochrane, PubMed, and EMBASE databases from inception to June 2012 and reference lists of known relevant articles without language restriction. Randomized controlled trials in which a treatment group that chewed gum was compared to a control group that fasted were included. Relevant data, including main outcomes of gastric fluid volume and gastric pH, were extracted. Results Four studies involving 287 patients were included. The presence of chewing gum was associated with small but statically significant increases in gastric fluid volume (mean difference = 0.21 mL/kg; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.39; P =.03) but not in gastric pH (mean difference = 0.11 mL/kg; 95% confidence interval, - 0.14 to 0.36; P =.38). Gastric fluid volume and gastric pH remained unchanged in subgroup analysis by either sugar or sugarless gum type. Conclusions Chewing gum in the perioperative period causes small but statically significant increases in gastric fluid volume and no change in gastric pH. The increase in gastric fluid most likely is of no clinical significance in terms of aspiration risk for the patient. Elective surgery should not necessarily be canceled or delayed in healthy patients who accidentally chew gum preoperatively.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)146-152
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Anesthesia
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Chewing Gum
Meta-Analysis
Stomach
Gingiva
Confidence Intervals
Perioperative Period
Information Storage and Retrieval
PubMed
Language
Randomized Controlled Trials

Keywords

  • Chewing gum
  • Gastric pH
  • Gastric volume
  • Gastrointestinal contents
  • Meta-analysis
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

The role of perioperative chewing gum on gastric fluid volume and gastric pH : A meta-analysis. / Ouanes, Jean Pierre P; Bicket, Mark C.; Togioka, Brandon; Tomas, Vicente Garcia; Wu, Christopher L.; Murphy, Jamie D.

In: Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, Vol. 27, No. 2, 01.03.2015, p. 146-152.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ouanes, Jean Pierre P ; Bicket, Mark C. ; Togioka, Brandon ; Tomas, Vicente Garcia ; Wu, Christopher L. ; Murphy, Jamie D. / The role of perioperative chewing gum on gastric fluid volume and gastric pH : A meta-analysis. In: Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2015 ; Vol. 27, No. 2. pp. 146-152.
@article{14c47ac063194ce5be4eb35ee8438248,
title = "The role of perioperative chewing gum on gastric fluid volume and gastric pH: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "Study objective To determine if preoperative gum chewing affects gastric pH and gastric fluid volume. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Data sources included Cochrane, PubMed, and EMBASE databases from inception to June 2012 and reference lists of known relevant articles without language restriction. Randomized controlled trials in which a treatment group that chewed gum was compared to a control group that fasted were included. Relevant data, including main outcomes of gastric fluid volume and gastric pH, were extracted. Results Four studies involving 287 patients were included. The presence of chewing gum was associated with small but statically significant increases in gastric fluid volume (mean difference = 0.21 mL/kg; 95{\%} confidence interval, 0.02-0.39; P =.03) but not in gastric pH (mean difference = 0.11 mL/kg; 95{\%} confidence interval, - 0.14 to 0.36; P =.38). Gastric fluid volume and gastric pH remained unchanged in subgroup analysis by either sugar or sugarless gum type. Conclusions Chewing gum in the perioperative period causes small but statically significant increases in gastric fluid volume and no change in gastric pH. The increase in gastric fluid most likely is of no clinical significance in terms of aspiration risk for the patient. Elective surgery should not necessarily be canceled or delayed in healthy patients who accidentally chew gum preoperatively.",
keywords = "Chewing gum, Gastric pH, Gastric volume, Gastrointestinal contents, Meta-analysis, Systematic review",
author = "Ouanes, {Jean Pierre P} and Bicket, {Mark C.} and Brandon Togioka and Tomas, {Vicente Garcia} and Wu, {Christopher L.} and Murphy, {Jamie D.}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.07.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "146--152",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Anesthesia",
issn = "0952-8180",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of perioperative chewing gum on gastric fluid volume and gastric pH

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Ouanes, Jean Pierre P

AU - Bicket, Mark C.

AU - Togioka, Brandon

AU - Tomas, Vicente Garcia

AU - Wu, Christopher L.

AU - Murphy, Jamie D.

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - Study objective To determine if preoperative gum chewing affects gastric pH and gastric fluid volume. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Data sources included Cochrane, PubMed, and EMBASE databases from inception to June 2012 and reference lists of known relevant articles without language restriction. Randomized controlled trials in which a treatment group that chewed gum was compared to a control group that fasted were included. Relevant data, including main outcomes of gastric fluid volume and gastric pH, were extracted. Results Four studies involving 287 patients were included. The presence of chewing gum was associated with small but statically significant increases in gastric fluid volume (mean difference = 0.21 mL/kg; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.39; P =.03) but not in gastric pH (mean difference = 0.11 mL/kg; 95% confidence interval, - 0.14 to 0.36; P =.38). Gastric fluid volume and gastric pH remained unchanged in subgroup analysis by either sugar or sugarless gum type. Conclusions Chewing gum in the perioperative period causes small but statically significant increases in gastric fluid volume and no change in gastric pH. The increase in gastric fluid most likely is of no clinical significance in terms of aspiration risk for the patient. Elective surgery should not necessarily be canceled or delayed in healthy patients who accidentally chew gum preoperatively.

AB - Study objective To determine if preoperative gum chewing affects gastric pH and gastric fluid volume. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Data sources included Cochrane, PubMed, and EMBASE databases from inception to June 2012 and reference lists of known relevant articles without language restriction. Randomized controlled trials in which a treatment group that chewed gum was compared to a control group that fasted were included. Relevant data, including main outcomes of gastric fluid volume and gastric pH, were extracted. Results Four studies involving 287 patients were included. The presence of chewing gum was associated with small but statically significant increases in gastric fluid volume (mean difference = 0.21 mL/kg; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.39; P =.03) but not in gastric pH (mean difference = 0.11 mL/kg; 95% confidence interval, - 0.14 to 0.36; P =.38). Gastric fluid volume and gastric pH remained unchanged in subgroup analysis by either sugar or sugarless gum type. Conclusions Chewing gum in the perioperative period causes small but statically significant increases in gastric fluid volume and no change in gastric pH. The increase in gastric fluid most likely is of no clinical significance in terms of aspiration risk for the patient. Elective surgery should not necessarily be canceled or delayed in healthy patients who accidentally chew gum preoperatively.

KW - Chewing gum

KW - Gastric pH

KW - Gastric volume

KW - Gastrointestinal contents

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924029761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924029761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.07.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.07.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 25442242

AN - SCOPUS:84924029761

VL - 27

SP - 146

EP - 152

JO - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

JF - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

SN - 0952-8180

IS - 2

ER -