The Role of Health Extension in Practice Transformation and Community Health Improvement: Lessons From 5 Case Studies

Arthur Kaufman, W. Perry Dickinson, Lyle Fagnan, F. Daniel Duffy, Michael L. Parchman, Robert L. Rhyne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act triggered 2 successive grant initiatives from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, allowing for the evolution of health extension models among 20 states, not limited to support for in-clinic primary care practice transformation, but also including a broader concept incorporating technical assistance for practices and their communities to address social determinants of health. Five states stand out in stretching the boundaries of health extension: New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, Colorado, and Washington. Their stories reveal lessons learned regarding the successes and challenges, including the importance of building sustained relationships with practices and community coalitions; of documenting success in broad terms as well as achieving diverse outcomes of meaning to different stakeholders; of understanding that health extension is a function that can be carried out by an individual or group depending on resources; and of being prepared for political struggles over "turf" and ownership of extension. All states saw the need for long-term, sustained fundraising beyond grants in an environment expecting a short-term return on investment, and they were challenged operating in a shifting health system landscape where the creativity and personal relationships built with small primary care practices was hindered when these practices were purchased by larger health delivery systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S67-S72
JournalAnnals of family medicine
Volume17
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 12 2019

Fingerprint

Health
Organized Financing
Primary Health Care
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Social Determinants of Health
Creativity
Ownership
Health Services Research

Keywords

  • health extension
  • organizational change
  • outreach
  • population health
  • practice-based research
  • primary care
  • social determinants of health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

The Role of Health Extension in Practice Transformation and Community Health Improvement : Lessons From 5 Case Studies. / Kaufman, Arthur; Dickinson, W. Perry; Fagnan, Lyle; Duffy, F. Daniel; Parchman, Michael L.; Rhyne, Robert L.

In: Annals of family medicine, Vol. 17, 12.08.2019, p. S67-S72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kaufman, Arthur ; Dickinson, W. Perry ; Fagnan, Lyle ; Duffy, F. Daniel ; Parchman, Michael L. ; Rhyne, Robert L. / The Role of Health Extension in Practice Transformation and Community Health Improvement : Lessons From 5 Case Studies. In: Annals of family medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 17. pp. S67-S72.
@article{eca9240723cc420ab2df7b028b03511e,
title = "The Role of Health Extension in Practice Transformation and Community Health Improvement: Lessons From 5 Case Studies",
abstract = "Passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act triggered 2 successive grant initiatives from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, allowing for the evolution of health extension models among 20 states, not limited to support for in-clinic primary care practice transformation, but also including a broader concept incorporating technical assistance for practices and their communities to address social determinants of health. Five states stand out in stretching the boundaries of health extension: New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, Colorado, and Washington. Their stories reveal lessons learned regarding the successes and challenges, including the importance of building sustained relationships with practices and community coalitions; of documenting success in broad terms as well as achieving diverse outcomes of meaning to different stakeholders; of understanding that health extension is a function that can be carried out by an individual or group depending on resources; and of being prepared for political struggles over {"}turf{"} and ownership of extension. All states saw the need for long-term, sustained fundraising beyond grants in an environment expecting a short-term return on investment, and they were challenged operating in a shifting health system landscape where the creativity and personal relationships built with small primary care practices was hindered when these practices were purchased by larger health delivery systems.",
keywords = "health extension, organizational change, outreach, population health, practice-based research, primary care, social determinants of health",
author = "Arthur Kaufman and Dickinson, {W. Perry} and Lyle Fagnan and Duffy, {F. Daniel} and Parchman, {Michael L.} and Rhyne, {Robert L.}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1370/afm.2409",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "S67--S72",
journal = "Annals of Family Medicine",
issn = "1544-1709",
publisher = "Annals of Family Medicine, Inc",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Role of Health Extension in Practice Transformation and Community Health Improvement

T2 - Lessons From 5 Case Studies

AU - Kaufman, Arthur

AU - Dickinson, W. Perry

AU - Fagnan, Lyle

AU - Duffy, F. Daniel

AU - Parchman, Michael L.

AU - Rhyne, Robert L.

PY - 2019/8/12

Y1 - 2019/8/12

N2 - Passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act triggered 2 successive grant initiatives from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, allowing for the evolution of health extension models among 20 states, not limited to support for in-clinic primary care practice transformation, but also including a broader concept incorporating technical assistance for practices and their communities to address social determinants of health. Five states stand out in stretching the boundaries of health extension: New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, Colorado, and Washington. Their stories reveal lessons learned regarding the successes and challenges, including the importance of building sustained relationships with practices and community coalitions; of documenting success in broad terms as well as achieving diverse outcomes of meaning to different stakeholders; of understanding that health extension is a function that can be carried out by an individual or group depending on resources; and of being prepared for political struggles over "turf" and ownership of extension. All states saw the need for long-term, sustained fundraising beyond grants in an environment expecting a short-term return on investment, and they were challenged operating in a shifting health system landscape where the creativity and personal relationships built with small primary care practices was hindered when these practices were purchased by larger health delivery systems.

AB - Passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act triggered 2 successive grant initiatives from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, allowing for the evolution of health extension models among 20 states, not limited to support for in-clinic primary care practice transformation, but also including a broader concept incorporating technical assistance for practices and their communities to address social determinants of health. Five states stand out in stretching the boundaries of health extension: New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, Colorado, and Washington. Their stories reveal lessons learned regarding the successes and challenges, including the importance of building sustained relationships with practices and community coalitions; of documenting success in broad terms as well as achieving diverse outcomes of meaning to different stakeholders; of understanding that health extension is a function that can be carried out by an individual or group depending on resources; and of being prepared for political struggles over "turf" and ownership of extension. All states saw the need for long-term, sustained fundraising beyond grants in an environment expecting a short-term return on investment, and they were challenged operating in a shifting health system landscape where the creativity and personal relationships built with small primary care practices was hindered when these practices were purchased by larger health delivery systems.

KW - health extension

KW - organizational change

KW - outreach

KW - population health

KW - practice-based research

KW - primary care

KW - social determinants of health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072143354&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072143354&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1370/afm.2409

DO - 10.1370/afm.2409

M3 - Article

C2 - 31405879

AN - SCOPUS:85072143354

VL - 17

SP - S67-S72

JO - Annals of Family Medicine

JF - Annals of Family Medicine

SN - 1544-1709

ER -