The requirement of occipital condyle resection in far-lateral approach to anterior foramen magnum lesions

Aclan Dogan, Mustafa Baskaya, David A. Vincent, Anil Nanda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether drilling out the occipital condyle facilitates surgery via the far-lateral approach, we compare 10 clinical cases with studies from 8 cadaver heads. Methods: In the last 6 years, 10 patients have been operated on via the far-lateral approach to the foramen magnum. Six of these patients had anterior foramen magnum meningiomas, 1 had a dermoid cyst, 1 had rheumatoid disease of the craniocervical junction, and 2 suffered vertebral artery aneurysms. The approach consisted of retromastoid craniectomy and Cl laminectomy. The increase in the area of exposure that is gained by fractional removal of the occipital condyle was quantified by measuring the degrees of visibility on 8 cadaveric specimens. Results: The 7 tumors and pannus of rheumatoid disease were completely excised and the 2 aneurysms were clipped without drilling of the occipital condyle. No patients had complications associated with surgery. All had improved neurological function postoperatively. In the cadavers, removing one-third of the occipital condyle produced a mean increase of 15.9° visibility, and removing one-half produced a mean increase of 19.9°. Conclusion: We suggest that removal of the occipital condyle is not necessary for the safe and complete resection of anterior intradural foramen magnum tumors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11-12
Number of pages2
JournalSkull Base
Volume11
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Foramen Magnum
Bone and Bones
Cadaver
Aneurysm
Dermoid Cyst
Laminectomy
Vertebral Artery
Meningioma
Neoplasms
Head

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

The requirement of occipital condyle resection in far-lateral approach to anterior foramen magnum lesions. / Dogan, Aclan; Baskaya, Mustafa; Vincent, David A.; Nanda, Anil.

In: Skull Base, Vol. 11, No. SUPPL. 1, 2001, p. 11-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dogan, A, Baskaya, M, Vincent, DA & Nanda, A 2001, 'The requirement of occipital condyle resection in far-lateral approach to anterior foramen magnum lesions', Skull Base, vol. 11, no. SUPPL. 1, pp. 11-12.
Dogan, Aclan ; Baskaya, Mustafa ; Vincent, David A. ; Nanda, Anil. / The requirement of occipital condyle resection in far-lateral approach to anterior foramen magnum lesions. In: Skull Base. 2001 ; Vol. 11, No. SUPPL. 1. pp. 11-12.
@article{e8dbaec0ee4949dcafd69bdebf43ae72,
title = "The requirement of occipital condyle resection in far-lateral approach to anterior foramen magnum lesions",
abstract = "Objective: To determine whether drilling out the occipital condyle facilitates surgery via the far-lateral approach, we compare 10 clinical cases with studies from 8 cadaver heads. Methods: In the last 6 years, 10 patients have been operated on via the far-lateral approach to the foramen magnum. Six of these patients had anterior foramen magnum meningiomas, 1 had a dermoid cyst, 1 had rheumatoid disease of the craniocervical junction, and 2 suffered vertebral artery aneurysms. The approach consisted of retromastoid craniectomy and Cl laminectomy. The increase in the area of exposure that is gained by fractional removal of the occipital condyle was quantified by measuring the degrees of visibility on 8 cadaveric specimens. Results: The 7 tumors and pannus of rheumatoid disease were completely excised and the 2 aneurysms were clipped without drilling of the occipital condyle. No patients had complications associated with surgery. All had improved neurological function postoperatively. In the cadavers, removing one-third of the occipital condyle produced a mean increase of 15.9° visibility, and removing one-half produced a mean increase of 19.9°. Conclusion: We suggest that removal of the occipital condyle is not necessary for the safe and complete resection of anterior intradural foramen magnum tumors.",
author = "Aclan Dogan and Mustafa Baskaya and Vincent, {David A.} and Anil Nanda",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "11--12",
journal = "Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part B: Skull Base",
issn = "2193-6331",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The requirement of occipital condyle resection in far-lateral approach to anterior foramen magnum lesions

AU - Dogan, Aclan

AU - Baskaya, Mustafa

AU - Vincent, David A.

AU - Nanda, Anil

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Objective: To determine whether drilling out the occipital condyle facilitates surgery via the far-lateral approach, we compare 10 clinical cases with studies from 8 cadaver heads. Methods: In the last 6 years, 10 patients have been operated on via the far-lateral approach to the foramen magnum. Six of these patients had anterior foramen magnum meningiomas, 1 had a dermoid cyst, 1 had rheumatoid disease of the craniocervical junction, and 2 suffered vertebral artery aneurysms. The approach consisted of retromastoid craniectomy and Cl laminectomy. The increase in the area of exposure that is gained by fractional removal of the occipital condyle was quantified by measuring the degrees of visibility on 8 cadaveric specimens. Results: The 7 tumors and pannus of rheumatoid disease were completely excised and the 2 aneurysms were clipped without drilling of the occipital condyle. No patients had complications associated with surgery. All had improved neurological function postoperatively. In the cadavers, removing one-third of the occipital condyle produced a mean increase of 15.9° visibility, and removing one-half produced a mean increase of 19.9°. Conclusion: We suggest that removal of the occipital condyle is not necessary for the safe and complete resection of anterior intradural foramen magnum tumors.

AB - Objective: To determine whether drilling out the occipital condyle facilitates surgery via the far-lateral approach, we compare 10 clinical cases with studies from 8 cadaver heads. Methods: In the last 6 years, 10 patients have been operated on via the far-lateral approach to the foramen magnum. Six of these patients had anterior foramen magnum meningiomas, 1 had a dermoid cyst, 1 had rheumatoid disease of the craniocervical junction, and 2 suffered vertebral artery aneurysms. The approach consisted of retromastoid craniectomy and Cl laminectomy. The increase in the area of exposure that is gained by fractional removal of the occipital condyle was quantified by measuring the degrees of visibility on 8 cadaveric specimens. Results: The 7 tumors and pannus of rheumatoid disease were completely excised and the 2 aneurysms were clipped without drilling of the occipital condyle. No patients had complications associated with surgery. All had improved neurological function postoperatively. In the cadavers, removing one-third of the occipital condyle produced a mean increase of 15.9° visibility, and removing one-half produced a mean increase of 19.9°. Conclusion: We suggest that removal of the occipital condyle is not necessary for the safe and complete resection of anterior intradural foramen magnum tumors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747802056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747802056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 11

EP - 12

JO - Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part B: Skull Base

JF - Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part B: Skull Base

SN - 2193-6331

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -