The reliability of psychiatric and psychological diagnosis

Joseph D. Matarazzo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

58 Scopus citations

Abstract

Experience suggests that many psychologists and psychiatrists, as well as most attorneys, judges, and other individuals whose work requires a knowledge of the extent of the reliability of psychologic and psychiatric diagnosis are not aware that recent research has dramatically influenced the conclusions one may draw in regard to the fallability of such human judgments. The purpose here is to provide a brief introduction of the history of such diagnostic judgments from the time of the early Greek philosophers through the decade of the 1960's. This will be followed by a review of a series of important studies from several research centers which were published during the past decade and which presented the first robust evidence that such clinician-to-clinician diagnoses have now attained remarkably high levels of reliability. In the last section, studies will be reviewed which show that the concurrent development of standardized interview schedules now allow layperson interviewers to achieve levels of reliability for psychiatric and psychologic interviews which are comparable to the high levels now attainable by mental health professionals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-145
Number of pages43
JournalClinical Psychology Review
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1983

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The reliability of psychiatric and psychological diagnosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this