The preoperative evaluation of patients considered for laparoscopic antireflux surgery

J. P. Waring, John Hunter, M. Oddsdottir, J. Wo, E. Katz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

127 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Few studies address the proper extent of the preoperative testing in patients referred for consideration of antireflux surgery. Our aim was to perform a thorough gastroesophageal evaluation and determine its influence on the therapeutic decisions of such patients. We evaluated 107 consecutive patients in a combined GI/Surgery clinic for severe or refractory gastroesophageal reflux. The patients had an EGD, esophageal manometry, and 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. Only patients with gastric symptoms had gastric testing. Nineteen patients were excluded, 12 refused further evaluation and seven were felt to be unfit for antireflux surgery because of medical or psychological reasons. Eighty-eight patients completed the required studies. Fifty-four patients (61%) had typical reflux symptoms and erosive esophagitis on EGD. All these patients had an abnormal pH study. Five of the 34 patients without esophagitis had a normal pH study and did not have surgery. Ten patients had poor peristalsis by esophageal manometry prompting a subtotal fundoplication. One patient had severe delayed gastric emptying, requiring pyloroplasty in addition to the fundoplication. Eighty of 83 patients had good or excellent surgical results. EGD and esophageal manometry are indispensable in the preoperative evaluation. Manometry may identify abnormalities altering surgical decisions in roughly 10% of patients. Routine ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring is of marginal benefit, except in patients without esophagitis or in those patients where the diagnosis is in doubt. Clinically significant gastric abnormalities are rare, and routine testing of gastric function is not indicated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)35-38
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume90
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Laparoscopy
Manometry
Esophagitis
Stomach
Esophageal pH Monitoring
Fundoplication
Peristalsis
Gastric Emptying
Gastroesophageal Reflux

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

The preoperative evaluation of patients considered for laparoscopic antireflux surgery. / Waring, J. P.; Hunter, John; Oddsdottir, M.; Wo, J.; Katz, E.

In: American Journal of Gastroenterology, Vol. 90, No. 1, 1995, p. 35-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Waring, J. P. ; Hunter, John ; Oddsdottir, M. ; Wo, J. ; Katz, E. / The preoperative evaluation of patients considered for laparoscopic antireflux surgery. In: American Journal of Gastroenterology. 1995 ; Vol. 90, No. 1. pp. 35-38.
@article{062996e18eb947218cee9c3d4648860f,
title = "The preoperative evaluation of patients considered for laparoscopic antireflux surgery",
abstract = "Few studies address the proper extent of the preoperative testing in patients referred for consideration of antireflux surgery. Our aim was to perform a thorough gastroesophageal evaluation and determine its influence on the therapeutic decisions of such patients. We evaluated 107 consecutive patients in a combined GI/Surgery clinic for severe or refractory gastroesophageal reflux. The patients had an EGD, esophageal manometry, and 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. Only patients with gastric symptoms had gastric testing. Nineteen patients were excluded, 12 refused further evaluation and seven were felt to be unfit for antireflux surgery because of medical or psychological reasons. Eighty-eight patients completed the required studies. Fifty-four patients (61{\%}) had typical reflux symptoms and erosive esophagitis on EGD. All these patients had an abnormal pH study. Five of the 34 patients without esophagitis had a normal pH study and did not have surgery. Ten patients had poor peristalsis by esophageal manometry prompting a subtotal fundoplication. One patient had severe delayed gastric emptying, requiring pyloroplasty in addition to the fundoplication. Eighty of 83 patients had good or excellent surgical results. EGD and esophageal manometry are indispensable in the preoperative evaluation. Manometry may identify abnormalities altering surgical decisions in roughly 10{\%} of patients. Routine ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring is of marginal benefit, except in patients without esophagitis or in those patients where the diagnosis is in doubt. Clinically significant gastric abnormalities are rare, and routine testing of gastric function is not indicated.",
author = "Waring, {J. P.} and John Hunter and M. Oddsdottir and J. Wo and E. Katz",
year = "1995",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "35--38",
journal = "American Journal of Gastroenterology",
issn = "0002-9270",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The preoperative evaluation of patients considered for laparoscopic antireflux surgery

AU - Waring, J. P.

AU - Hunter, John

AU - Oddsdottir, M.

AU - Wo, J.

AU - Katz, E.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Few studies address the proper extent of the preoperative testing in patients referred for consideration of antireflux surgery. Our aim was to perform a thorough gastroesophageal evaluation and determine its influence on the therapeutic decisions of such patients. We evaluated 107 consecutive patients in a combined GI/Surgery clinic for severe or refractory gastroesophageal reflux. The patients had an EGD, esophageal manometry, and 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. Only patients with gastric symptoms had gastric testing. Nineteen patients were excluded, 12 refused further evaluation and seven were felt to be unfit for antireflux surgery because of medical or psychological reasons. Eighty-eight patients completed the required studies. Fifty-four patients (61%) had typical reflux symptoms and erosive esophagitis on EGD. All these patients had an abnormal pH study. Five of the 34 patients without esophagitis had a normal pH study and did not have surgery. Ten patients had poor peristalsis by esophageal manometry prompting a subtotal fundoplication. One patient had severe delayed gastric emptying, requiring pyloroplasty in addition to the fundoplication. Eighty of 83 patients had good or excellent surgical results. EGD and esophageal manometry are indispensable in the preoperative evaluation. Manometry may identify abnormalities altering surgical decisions in roughly 10% of patients. Routine ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring is of marginal benefit, except in patients without esophagitis or in those patients where the diagnosis is in doubt. Clinically significant gastric abnormalities are rare, and routine testing of gastric function is not indicated.

AB - Few studies address the proper extent of the preoperative testing in patients referred for consideration of antireflux surgery. Our aim was to perform a thorough gastroesophageal evaluation and determine its influence on the therapeutic decisions of such patients. We evaluated 107 consecutive patients in a combined GI/Surgery clinic for severe or refractory gastroesophageal reflux. The patients had an EGD, esophageal manometry, and 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. Only patients with gastric symptoms had gastric testing. Nineteen patients were excluded, 12 refused further evaluation and seven were felt to be unfit for antireflux surgery because of medical or psychological reasons. Eighty-eight patients completed the required studies. Fifty-four patients (61%) had typical reflux symptoms and erosive esophagitis on EGD. All these patients had an abnormal pH study. Five of the 34 patients without esophagitis had a normal pH study and did not have surgery. Ten patients had poor peristalsis by esophageal manometry prompting a subtotal fundoplication. One patient had severe delayed gastric emptying, requiring pyloroplasty in addition to the fundoplication. Eighty of 83 patients had good or excellent surgical results. EGD and esophageal manometry are indispensable in the preoperative evaluation. Manometry may identify abnormalities altering surgical decisions in roughly 10% of patients. Routine ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring is of marginal benefit, except in patients without esophagitis or in those patients where the diagnosis is in doubt. Clinically significant gastric abnormalities are rare, and routine testing of gastric function is not indicated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028815243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028815243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7801945

AN - SCOPUS:0028815243

VL - 90

SP - 35

EP - 38

JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology

JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology

SN - 0002-9270

IS - 1

ER -