The perceived impact of 42 cfr part 2 on coordination and integration of care: A qualitative analysis

Dennis McCarty, Traci Rieckmann, Robin L. Baker, Kenneth (John) McConnell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 2 (42 CFR Part 2) controls the release of patient information about treatment for substance use disorders. In 2016, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) released a proposed rule to update the regulations, reduce provider burdens, and facilitate information exchange. Oregon's Medicaid program (Oregon Health Plan) altered the financing and structure of medical, dental, and behavioral care to promote greater integration and coordination. A qualitative analysis examined the perceived impact of 42 CFR Part 2 on care coordination and integration. Methods: Interviews with 76 stakeholders (114 interviews) conducted in 2012-2015 probed the processes of integrating behavioral health into primary care settings in Oregon and assessed issues associated with adherence to 42 CFR Part 2. Results: Respondents expressed concerns that the regulations caused legal confusion, inhibited communication and information sharing, and required updating. Addiction treatment directors noted the challenges of obtaining patient consent to share information with primary care providers. Conclusions: The confidentiality regulations were perceived as a barrier to care coordination and integration. The Oregon Health Authority, therefore, requested regulatory changes. SAMHSA's proposed revisions permit a general consent to an entire health care team and allow inclusion of substance use disorder information within health information exchanges, but they mandate data segmentation of diagnostic and procedure codes related to substance use disorders and restrict access only to parties with authorized consent, possibly adding barriers to the coordination and integration of addiction treatment with primary care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)245-249
Number of pages5
JournalPsychiatric Services
Volume68
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Substance-Related Disorders
Primary Health Care
United States Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Health Services Misuse
Health Services Administration
Interviews
Confusion
Patient Care Team
Dental Care
Information Dissemination
Confidentiality
Medicaid
Health
Mental Health Services
Therapeutics
Communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

The perceived impact of 42 cfr part 2 on coordination and integration of care : A qualitative analysis. / McCarty, Dennis; Rieckmann, Traci; Baker, Robin L.; McConnell, Kenneth (John).

In: Psychiatric Services, Vol. 68, No. 3, 01.03.2017, p. 245-249.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c739f9190510451784f5755e6fd19fa7,
title = "The perceived impact of 42 cfr part 2 on coordination and integration of care: A qualitative analysis",
abstract = "Objective: Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 2 (42 CFR Part 2) controls the release of patient information about treatment for substance use disorders. In 2016, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) released a proposed rule to update the regulations, reduce provider burdens, and facilitate information exchange. Oregon's Medicaid program (Oregon Health Plan) altered the financing and structure of medical, dental, and behavioral care to promote greater integration and coordination. A qualitative analysis examined the perceived impact of 42 CFR Part 2 on care coordination and integration. Methods: Interviews with 76 stakeholders (114 interviews) conducted in 2012-2015 probed the processes of integrating behavioral health into primary care settings in Oregon and assessed issues associated with adherence to 42 CFR Part 2. Results: Respondents expressed concerns that the regulations caused legal confusion, inhibited communication and information sharing, and required updating. Addiction treatment directors noted the challenges of obtaining patient consent to share information with primary care providers. Conclusions: The confidentiality regulations were perceived as a barrier to care coordination and integration. The Oregon Health Authority, therefore, requested regulatory changes. SAMHSA's proposed revisions permit a general consent to an entire health care team and allow inclusion of substance use disorder information within health information exchanges, but they mandate data segmentation of diagnostic and procedure codes related to substance use disorders and restrict access only to parties with authorized consent, possibly adding barriers to the coordination and integration of addiction treatment with primary care.",
author = "Dennis McCarty and Traci Rieckmann and Baker, {Robin L.} and McConnell, {Kenneth (John)}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1176/appi.ps.201600138",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "245--249",
journal = "Psychiatric Services",
issn = "1075-2730",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The perceived impact of 42 cfr part 2 on coordination and integration of care

T2 - A qualitative analysis

AU - McCarty, Dennis

AU - Rieckmann, Traci

AU - Baker, Robin L.

AU - McConnell, Kenneth (John)

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Objective: Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 2 (42 CFR Part 2) controls the release of patient information about treatment for substance use disorders. In 2016, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) released a proposed rule to update the regulations, reduce provider burdens, and facilitate information exchange. Oregon's Medicaid program (Oregon Health Plan) altered the financing and structure of medical, dental, and behavioral care to promote greater integration and coordination. A qualitative analysis examined the perceived impact of 42 CFR Part 2 on care coordination and integration. Methods: Interviews with 76 stakeholders (114 interviews) conducted in 2012-2015 probed the processes of integrating behavioral health into primary care settings in Oregon and assessed issues associated with adherence to 42 CFR Part 2. Results: Respondents expressed concerns that the regulations caused legal confusion, inhibited communication and information sharing, and required updating. Addiction treatment directors noted the challenges of obtaining patient consent to share information with primary care providers. Conclusions: The confidentiality regulations were perceived as a barrier to care coordination and integration. The Oregon Health Authority, therefore, requested regulatory changes. SAMHSA's proposed revisions permit a general consent to an entire health care team and allow inclusion of substance use disorder information within health information exchanges, but they mandate data segmentation of diagnostic and procedure codes related to substance use disorders and restrict access only to parties with authorized consent, possibly adding barriers to the coordination and integration of addiction treatment with primary care.

AB - Objective: Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 2 (42 CFR Part 2) controls the release of patient information about treatment for substance use disorders. In 2016, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) released a proposed rule to update the regulations, reduce provider burdens, and facilitate information exchange. Oregon's Medicaid program (Oregon Health Plan) altered the financing and structure of medical, dental, and behavioral care to promote greater integration and coordination. A qualitative analysis examined the perceived impact of 42 CFR Part 2 on care coordination and integration. Methods: Interviews with 76 stakeholders (114 interviews) conducted in 2012-2015 probed the processes of integrating behavioral health into primary care settings in Oregon and assessed issues associated with adherence to 42 CFR Part 2. Results: Respondents expressed concerns that the regulations caused legal confusion, inhibited communication and information sharing, and required updating. Addiction treatment directors noted the challenges of obtaining patient consent to share information with primary care providers. Conclusions: The confidentiality regulations were perceived as a barrier to care coordination and integration. The Oregon Health Authority, therefore, requested regulatory changes. SAMHSA's proposed revisions permit a general consent to an entire health care team and allow inclusion of substance use disorder information within health information exchanges, but they mandate data segmentation of diagnostic and procedure codes related to substance use disorders and restrict access only to parties with authorized consent, possibly adding barriers to the coordination and integration of addiction treatment with primary care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014108753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014108753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1176/appi.ps.201600138

DO - 10.1176/appi.ps.201600138

M3 - Article

C2 - 27799017

AN - SCOPUS:85014108753

VL - 68

SP - 245

EP - 249

JO - Psychiatric Services

JF - Psychiatric Services

SN - 1075-2730

IS - 3

ER -