The paradox of persisting self-punitive behavior

Judson S. Brown, Christopher Cunningham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The paradox presented by the "masochist" who persists in behaviors that are followed contingently by seemingly aversive consequences is analyzed. Prototypical data from infra-human experiments are evaluated for their bearing on two theories of self-punitive actions, one based on traditional stimulus-response principles, the other on cognitive assumptions. Although the label "self-punitive" is widely used, a question remains as to whether animals that react so as to bring about so-called noxious outcomes are properly to be described as "punishing themselves." In an attempt to resolve this question, two major conceptions of punishment are evaluated as they apply to self-punitive studies. Neither conception is deemed adequate because of a lack of criteria for determining which events are aversive. A search for criteria of aversiveness eventuates in a completely relativistic view in which noxiousness and attractiveness are judged to be relational rather than absolute properties of events.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-354
Number of pages12
JournalNeuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1981

Fingerprint

Punishment

Keywords

  • Aversive stimulation
  • Cognitive discrimination
  • Fear
  • Masochism
  • Punishment
  • Rats
  • Self-punitive behavior
  • Shock escape

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

The paradox of persisting self-punitive behavior. / Brown, Judson S.; Cunningham, Christopher.

In: Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1981, p. 343-354.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4ca9828f2a5547629a199d9d4b5127a5,
title = "The paradox of persisting self-punitive behavior",
abstract = "The paradox presented by the {"}masochist{"} who persists in behaviors that are followed contingently by seemingly aversive consequences is analyzed. Prototypical data from infra-human experiments are evaluated for their bearing on two theories of self-punitive actions, one based on traditional stimulus-response principles, the other on cognitive assumptions. Although the label {"}self-punitive{"} is widely used, a question remains as to whether animals that react so as to bring about so-called noxious outcomes are properly to be described as {"}punishing themselves.{"} In an attempt to resolve this question, two major conceptions of punishment are evaluated as they apply to self-punitive studies. Neither conception is deemed adequate because of a lack of criteria for determining which events are aversive. A search for criteria of aversiveness eventuates in a completely relativistic view in which noxiousness and attractiveness are judged to be relational rather than absolute properties of events.",
keywords = "Aversive stimulation, Cognitive discrimination, Fear, Masochism, Punishment, Rats, Self-punitive behavior, Shock escape",
author = "Brown, {Judson S.} and Christopher Cunningham",
year = "1981",
doi = "10.1016/0149-7634(81)90029-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "343--354",
journal = "Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews",
issn = "0149-7634",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The paradox of persisting self-punitive behavior

AU - Brown, Judson S.

AU - Cunningham, Christopher

PY - 1981

Y1 - 1981

N2 - The paradox presented by the "masochist" who persists in behaviors that are followed contingently by seemingly aversive consequences is analyzed. Prototypical data from infra-human experiments are evaluated for their bearing on two theories of self-punitive actions, one based on traditional stimulus-response principles, the other on cognitive assumptions. Although the label "self-punitive" is widely used, a question remains as to whether animals that react so as to bring about so-called noxious outcomes are properly to be described as "punishing themselves." In an attempt to resolve this question, two major conceptions of punishment are evaluated as they apply to self-punitive studies. Neither conception is deemed adequate because of a lack of criteria for determining which events are aversive. A search for criteria of aversiveness eventuates in a completely relativistic view in which noxiousness and attractiveness are judged to be relational rather than absolute properties of events.

AB - The paradox presented by the "masochist" who persists in behaviors that are followed contingently by seemingly aversive consequences is analyzed. Prototypical data from infra-human experiments are evaluated for their bearing on two theories of self-punitive actions, one based on traditional stimulus-response principles, the other on cognitive assumptions. Although the label "self-punitive" is widely used, a question remains as to whether animals that react so as to bring about so-called noxious outcomes are properly to be described as "punishing themselves." In an attempt to resolve this question, two major conceptions of punishment are evaluated as they apply to self-punitive studies. Neither conception is deemed adequate because of a lack of criteria for determining which events are aversive. A search for criteria of aversiveness eventuates in a completely relativistic view in which noxiousness and attractiveness are judged to be relational rather than absolute properties of events.

KW - Aversive stimulation

KW - Cognitive discrimination

KW - Fear

KW - Masochism

KW - Punishment

KW - Rats

KW - Self-punitive behavior

KW - Shock escape

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019783414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019783414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0149-7634(81)90029-4

DO - 10.1016/0149-7634(81)90029-4

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 343

EP - 354

JO - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

JF - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

SN - 0149-7634

IS - 3

ER -