The origin of the human auditory brain-stem response wave II

William Martin, Hillel Pratt, John W. Schwegler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Auditory brain-stem responses (ABRs) were recorded from human subjects undergoing neurosurgical procedures which exposed the auditory nerve. Scalp recordings indicated that the latency of the negativity between waves (In) and II (In) and the latency of positive peak II (IIp) were shorter when the nerve was suspended in air than when the nerve was submerged in cerebrospinal fluid or saline, while earlier and later waves remained unaffected. These results could not be attributed to changes in stimulus or recording parameters or conduction velocity. Computational and somatosensory experimental evidence of stationary potentials generated by physical properties of the volume conductor, including changes in conductivity or geometry, are presented to develop a model of wave IIp generation. The results of this study suggest that wave IIp (and probably In) are manifestations of current flux asymmetries across conductivity boundaries created by the temporal bone-cerebrospinal fluid intradural space-brain-stem interfaces. The current flux asymmetries are generated as the propagating auditory nerve action potential crosses the conductivity boundaries. These results also indicate that the physical characteristics of the volume conductor and neural pathways must be considered when interpreting surface recorded evoked potentials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)357-370
Number of pages14
JournalElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/ Evoked Potentials
Volume96
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cochlear Nerve
Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials
Cerebrospinal Fluid
Neurosurgical Procedures
Neural Pathways
Temporal Bone
Scalp
Evoked Potentials
Action Potentials
Brain Stem
Air

Keywords

  • (Human)
  • Auditory brain-stem response
  • Evoked potentials
  • Generators
  • Intraoperative monitoring
  • Stationary potentials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

The origin of the human auditory brain-stem response wave II. / Martin, William; Pratt, Hillel; Schwegler, John W.

In: Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/ Evoked Potentials, Vol. 96, No. 4, 1995, p. 357-370.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Martin, William ; Pratt, Hillel ; Schwegler, John W. / The origin of the human auditory brain-stem response wave II. In: Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/ Evoked Potentials. 1995 ; Vol. 96, No. 4. pp. 357-370.
@article{b18c2ebfd9154b96856c5df0bb36c185,
title = "The origin of the human auditory brain-stem response wave II",
abstract = "Auditory brain-stem responses (ABRs) were recorded from human subjects undergoing neurosurgical procedures which exposed the auditory nerve. Scalp recordings indicated that the latency of the negativity between waves (In) and II (In) and the latency of positive peak II (IIp) were shorter when the nerve was suspended in air than when the nerve was submerged in cerebrospinal fluid or saline, while earlier and later waves remained unaffected. These results could not be attributed to changes in stimulus or recording parameters or conduction velocity. Computational and somatosensory experimental evidence of stationary potentials generated by physical properties of the volume conductor, including changes in conductivity or geometry, are presented to develop a model of wave IIp generation. The results of this study suggest that wave IIp (and probably In) are manifestations of current flux asymmetries across conductivity boundaries created by the temporal bone-cerebrospinal fluid intradural space-brain-stem interfaces. The current flux asymmetries are generated as the propagating auditory nerve action potential crosses the conductivity boundaries. These results also indicate that the physical characteristics of the volume conductor and neural pathways must be considered when interpreting surface recorded evoked potentials.",
keywords = "(Human), Auditory brain-stem response, Evoked potentials, Generators, Intraoperative monitoring, Stationary potentials",
author = "William Martin and Hillel Pratt and Schwegler, {John W.}",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1016/0168-5597(94)00326-A",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "96",
pages = "357--370",
journal = "Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Evoked Potentials",
issn = "0168-5597",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The origin of the human auditory brain-stem response wave II

AU - Martin, William

AU - Pratt, Hillel

AU - Schwegler, John W.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Auditory brain-stem responses (ABRs) were recorded from human subjects undergoing neurosurgical procedures which exposed the auditory nerve. Scalp recordings indicated that the latency of the negativity between waves (In) and II (In) and the latency of positive peak II (IIp) were shorter when the nerve was suspended in air than when the nerve was submerged in cerebrospinal fluid or saline, while earlier and later waves remained unaffected. These results could not be attributed to changes in stimulus or recording parameters or conduction velocity. Computational and somatosensory experimental evidence of stationary potentials generated by physical properties of the volume conductor, including changes in conductivity or geometry, are presented to develop a model of wave IIp generation. The results of this study suggest that wave IIp (and probably In) are manifestations of current flux asymmetries across conductivity boundaries created by the temporal bone-cerebrospinal fluid intradural space-brain-stem interfaces. The current flux asymmetries are generated as the propagating auditory nerve action potential crosses the conductivity boundaries. These results also indicate that the physical characteristics of the volume conductor and neural pathways must be considered when interpreting surface recorded evoked potentials.

AB - Auditory brain-stem responses (ABRs) were recorded from human subjects undergoing neurosurgical procedures which exposed the auditory nerve. Scalp recordings indicated that the latency of the negativity between waves (In) and II (In) and the latency of positive peak II (IIp) were shorter when the nerve was suspended in air than when the nerve was submerged in cerebrospinal fluid or saline, while earlier and later waves remained unaffected. These results could not be attributed to changes in stimulus or recording parameters or conduction velocity. Computational and somatosensory experimental evidence of stationary potentials generated by physical properties of the volume conductor, including changes in conductivity or geometry, are presented to develop a model of wave IIp generation. The results of this study suggest that wave IIp (and probably In) are manifestations of current flux asymmetries across conductivity boundaries created by the temporal bone-cerebrospinal fluid intradural space-brain-stem interfaces. The current flux asymmetries are generated as the propagating auditory nerve action potential crosses the conductivity boundaries. These results also indicate that the physical characteristics of the volume conductor and neural pathways must be considered when interpreting surface recorded evoked potentials.

KW - (Human)

KW - Auditory brain-stem response

KW - Evoked potentials

KW - Generators

KW - Intraoperative monitoring

KW - Stationary potentials

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029010848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029010848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0168-5597(94)00326-A

DO - 10.1016/0168-5597(94)00326-A

M3 - Article

C2 - 7635080

AN - SCOPUS:0029010848

VL - 96

SP - 357

EP - 370

JO - Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Evoked Potentials

JF - Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Evoked Potentials

SN - 0168-5597

IS - 4

ER -