The Oregon court of appeals and the state civil commitment statute

Joseph Bloom, Juliet Britton, Wil Berry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In 1973 the Oregon Legislature passed a major revision of its civil commitment law adopting changes that mirrored those taking place across the United States. The new sections offered significant protections of the rights of individuals who are alleged to have mental illness, a limitation on the length of commitment, the adoption of both dangerousness and gravely disabled type commitment criteria and the adoption of “beyond a reasonable doubt” as the standard of proof for commitment hearings. From 1973 to the present time, the Oregon Court of Appeals adjudicated a large number of appeals emanating from civil commitment courts. This article is based on a review of 98 written Oregon Court of Appeals commitment decisions from the years 1998 through 2015 and is accompanied by a review of legislative intent in 1973. It appears that the court of appeals has significantly altered the 1973 legislative changes by moving the dangerousness criteria to imminence and the gravely disabled criteria to a focus on survival. Empirically, civil commitment has dramatically decreased in Oregon over a 40-year period and the case law, as developed by Oregon Court of Appeals, has had a significant contributing role in this reduction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)52-61
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
Volume45
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dangerous Behavior
Hearing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

The Oregon court of appeals and the state civil commitment statute. / Bloom, Joseph; Britton, Juliet; Berry, Wil.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Vol. 45, No. 1, 01.03.2017, p. 52-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bloom, Joseph ; Britton, Juliet ; Berry, Wil. / The Oregon court of appeals and the state civil commitment statute. In: Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 2017 ; Vol. 45, No. 1. pp. 52-61.
@article{b8a4f271517c4a0488b33d55f2d8162c,
title = "The Oregon court of appeals and the state civil commitment statute",
abstract = "In 1973 the Oregon Legislature passed a major revision of its civil commitment law adopting changes that mirrored those taking place across the United States. The new sections offered significant protections of the rights of individuals who are alleged to have mental illness, a limitation on the length of commitment, the adoption of both dangerousness and gravely disabled type commitment criteria and the adoption of “beyond a reasonable doubt” as the standard of proof for commitment hearings. From 1973 to the present time, the Oregon Court of Appeals adjudicated a large number of appeals emanating from civil commitment courts. This article is based on a review of 98 written Oregon Court of Appeals commitment decisions from the years 1998 through 2015 and is accompanied by a review of legislative intent in 1973. It appears that the court of appeals has significantly altered the 1973 legislative changes by moving the dangerousness criteria to imminence and the gravely disabled criteria to a focus on survival. Empirically, civil commitment has dramatically decreased in Oregon over a 40-year period and the case law, as developed by Oregon Court of Appeals, has had a significant contributing role in this reduction.",
author = "Joseph Bloom and Juliet Britton and Wil Berry",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "52--61",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
issn = "1093-6793",
publisher = "American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Oregon court of appeals and the state civil commitment statute

AU - Bloom, Joseph

AU - Britton, Juliet

AU - Berry, Wil

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - In 1973 the Oregon Legislature passed a major revision of its civil commitment law adopting changes that mirrored those taking place across the United States. The new sections offered significant protections of the rights of individuals who are alleged to have mental illness, a limitation on the length of commitment, the adoption of both dangerousness and gravely disabled type commitment criteria and the adoption of “beyond a reasonable doubt” as the standard of proof for commitment hearings. From 1973 to the present time, the Oregon Court of Appeals adjudicated a large number of appeals emanating from civil commitment courts. This article is based on a review of 98 written Oregon Court of Appeals commitment decisions from the years 1998 through 2015 and is accompanied by a review of legislative intent in 1973. It appears that the court of appeals has significantly altered the 1973 legislative changes by moving the dangerousness criteria to imminence and the gravely disabled criteria to a focus on survival. Empirically, civil commitment has dramatically decreased in Oregon over a 40-year period and the case law, as developed by Oregon Court of Appeals, has had a significant contributing role in this reduction.

AB - In 1973 the Oregon Legislature passed a major revision of its civil commitment law adopting changes that mirrored those taking place across the United States. The new sections offered significant protections of the rights of individuals who are alleged to have mental illness, a limitation on the length of commitment, the adoption of both dangerousness and gravely disabled type commitment criteria and the adoption of “beyond a reasonable doubt” as the standard of proof for commitment hearings. From 1973 to the present time, the Oregon Court of Appeals adjudicated a large number of appeals emanating from civil commitment courts. This article is based on a review of 98 written Oregon Court of Appeals commitment decisions from the years 1998 through 2015 and is accompanied by a review of legislative intent in 1973. It appears that the court of appeals has significantly altered the 1973 legislative changes by moving the dangerousness criteria to imminence and the gravely disabled criteria to a focus on survival. Empirically, civil commitment has dramatically decreased in Oregon over a 40-year period and the case law, as developed by Oregon Court of Appeals, has had a significant contributing role in this reduction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014776347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014776347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 28270463

AN - SCOPUS:85014776347

VL - 45

SP - 52

EP - 61

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

SN - 1093-6793

IS - 1

ER -