The Open Access initiative in scientific and biomedical publishing

Fourth in the series on editorship

Thomas J. Liesegang, Andrew P. Schachat, Daniel Albert

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To provide basic information about the Open Access concept and its historical development, define the benefits and challenges inherent in this new model, and identify the value of the traditional print model and its movement towards more open access. Review of current information on the subject from numerous sources. Medline search and Internet search engines on the topic of Open Access Publishing. The Open Access initiative derives from several premises: medical libraries can no longer afford journal subscriptions; society benefits from the open exchange of ideas; society has in large part already paid for this research; the Internet provides an available venue. The traditional journal publishers model, however, has functioned well over many years with a robust peer review system and increasing Internet digital components permitting search and cross referencing, including elements of the Open Access model. It will be difficult to maintain the costs of both the traditional journal system and the fully implemented Open Access model. Any decisions that are made must ensure that the archive of prior medical knowledge is not lost, that financial barriers do not restrict publication, and that research continues to be available to those who need it, in the media that they prefer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)156-167
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume139
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Internet
Medical Libraries
Search Engine
Peer Review
Research
Publications
Costs and Cost Analysis
Open Access Publishing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

The Open Access initiative in scientific and biomedical publishing : Fourth in the series on editorship. / Liesegang, Thomas J.; Schachat, Andrew P.; Albert, Daniel.

In: American Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 139, No. 1, 01.01.2005, p. 156-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{50c472351d6243b9a18a24ea9c8b4ec7,
title = "The Open Access initiative in scientific and biomedical publishing: Fourth in the series on editorship",
abstract = "To provide basic information about the Open Access concept and its historical development, define the benefits and challenges inherent in this new model, and identify the value of the traditional print model and its movement towards more open access. Review of current information on the subject from numerous sources. Medline search and Internet search engines on the topic of Open Access Publishing. The Open Access initiative derives from several premises: medical libraries can no longer afford journal subscriptions; society benefits from the open exchange of ideas; society has in large part already paid for this research; the Internet provides an available venue. The traditional journal publishers model, however, has functioned well over many years with a robust peer review system and increasing Internet digital components permitting search and cross referencing, including elements of the Open Access model. It will be difficult to maintain the costs of both the traditional journal system and the fully implemented Open Access model. Any decisions that are made must ensure that the archive of prior medical knowledge is not lost, that financial barriers do not restrict publication, and that research continues to be available to those who need it, in the media that they prefer.",
author = "Liesegang, {Thomas J.} and Schachat, {Andrew P.} and Daniel Albert",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajo.2004.10.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "139",
pages = "156--167",
journal = "American Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0002-9394",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Open Access initiative in scientific and biomedical publishing

T2 - Fourth in the series on editorship

AU - Liesegang, Thomas J.

AU - Schachat, Andrew P.

AU - Albert, Daniel

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - To provide basic information about the Open Access concept and its historical development, define the benefits and challenges inherent in this new model, and identify the value of the traditional print model and its movement towards more open access. Review of current information on the subject from numerous sources. Medline search and Internet search engines on the topic of Open Access Publishing. The Open Access initiative derives from several premises: medical libraries can no longer afford journal subscriptions; society benefits from the open exchange of ideas; society has in large part already paid for this research; the Internet provides an available venue. The traditional journal publishers model, however, has functioned well over many years with a robust peer review system and increasing Internet digital components permitting search and cross referencing, including elements of the Open Access model. It will be difficult to maintain the costs of both the traditional journal system and the fully implemented Open Access model. Any decisions that are made must ensure that the archive of prior medical knowledge is not lost, that financial barriers do not restrict publication, and that research continues to be available to those who need it, in the media that they prefer.

AB - To provide basic information about the Open Access concept and its historical development, define the benefits and challenges inherent in this new model, and identify the value of the traditional print model and its movement towards more open access. Review of current information on the subject from numerous sources. Medline search and Internet search engines on the topic of Open Access Publishing. The Open Access initiative derives from several premises: medical libraries can no longer afford journal subscriptions; society benefits from the open exchange of ideas; society has in large part already paid for this research; the Internet provides an available venue. The traditional journal publishers model, however, has functioned well over many years with a robust peer review system and increasing Internet digital components permitting search and cross referencing, including elements of the Open Access model. It will be difficult to maintain the costs of both the traditional journal system and the fully implemented Open Access model. Any decisions that are made must ensure that the archive of prior medical knowledge is not lost, that financial barriers do not restrict publication, and that research continues to be available to those who need it, in the media that they prefer.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=11844256415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=11844256415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.10.010

DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.10.010

M3 - Review article

VL - 139

SP - 156

EP - 167

JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0002-9394

IS - 1

ER -