The Job Accommodation Scale (JAS): Psychometric Evaluation of a New Measure of Employer Support for Temporary Job Modifications

William S. Shaw, Vicki L. Kristman, Kelly Williams-Whitt, Sophie Soklaridis, Yueng-hsiang Huang, Pierre Côté, Patrick Loisel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction An employer offer of temporary job modification is a key strategy for facilitating return-to-work for musculoskeletal conditions, but there are no validated scales to assess the level of support for temporary job modifications across a range of job types and organizations. Objective To pilot test a new 21-item self-report measure [the Job Accommodation Scale (JAS)] to assess its applicability, internal consistency, factor structure, and relation to physical job demands. Methods Supervisors (N = 804, 72.8 % male, mean age = 46) were recruited from 19 employment settings in the USA and Canada and completed a 30-min online survey regarding job modification practices. As part of the survey, supervisors nominated and described a job position they supervised and completed the JAS for a hypothetical worker (in that position) with an episode of low back pain. Job characteristics were derived from the occupational informational network job classification database. Results The full response range (1–4) was utilized on all 21 items, with no ceiling or floor effects. Avoiding awkward postures was the most feasible accommodation and moving the employee to a different site or location was the least feasible. An exploratory factor analysis suggested five underlying factors (Modify physical workload; Modify work environment; Modify work schedule; Find alternate work; and Arrange for assistance), and there was an acceptable goodness-of-fit for the five parceled sub-factor scores as a single latent construct in a measurement model (structural equation model). Job accommodations were less feasible for more physical jobs and for heavier industries. Conclusions The pilot administration of the JAS with respect to a hypothetical worker with low back pain showed initial support for its applicability, reliability, and validity when administered to supervisors. Future studies should assess its validity for use in actual disability cases, for a range of health conditions, and to assess different stakeholder opinions about the feasibility of job accommodation strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)755-765
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychometrics
Low Back Pain
Metallurgy
Return to Work
Structural Models
Workload
Posture
Reproducibility of Results
Self Report
Statistical Factor Analysis
Canada
Appointments and Schedules
Organizations
Databases
Health
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Evaluation
  • Job accommodation
  • Return to work
  • Scales
  • Supervisor
  • Task modification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Occupational Therapy

Cite this

The Job Accommodation Scale (JAS) : Psychometric Evaluation of a New Measure of Employer Support for Temporary Job Modifications. / Shaw, William S.; Kristman, Vicki L.; Williams-Whitt, Kelly; Soklaridis, Sophie; Huang, Yueng-hsiang; Côté, Pierre; Loisel, Patrick.

In: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.01.2014, p. 755-765.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shaw, William S. ; Kristman, Vicki L. ; Williams-Whitt, Kelly ; Soklaridis, Sophie ; Huang, Yueng-hsiang ; Côté, Pierre ; Loisel, Patrick. / The Job Accommodation Scale (JAS) : Psychometric Evaluation of a New Measure of Employer Support for Temporary Job Modifications. In: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2014 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 755-765.
@article{7f84a379e80d418784f9b58f1cd943ef,
title = "The Job Accommodation Scale (JAS): Psychometric Evaluation of a New Measure of Employer Support for Temporary Job Modifications",
abstract = "Introduction An employer offer of temporary job modification is a key strategy for facilitating return-to-work for musculoskeletal conditions, but there are no validated scales to assess the level of support for temporary job modifications across a range of job types and organizations. Objective To pilot test a new 21-item self-report measure [the Job Accommodation Scale (JAS)] to assess its applicability, internal consistency, factor structure, and relation to physical job demands. Methods Supervisors (N = 804, 72.8 {\%} male, mean age = 46) were recruited from 19 employment settings in the USA and Canada and completed a 30-min online survey regarding job modification practices. As part of the survey, supervisors nominated and described a job position they supervised and completed the JAS for a hypothetical worker (in that position) with an episode of low back pain. Job characteristics were derived from the occupational informational network job classification database. Results The full response range (1–4) was utilized on all 21 items, with no ceiling or floor effects. Avoiding awkward postures was the most feasible accommodation and moving the employee to a different site or location was the least feasible. An exploratory factor analysis suggested five underlying factors (Modify physical workload; Modify work environment; Modify work schedule; Find alternate work; and Arrange for assistance), and there was an acceptable goodness-of-fit for the five parceled sub-factor scores as a single latent construct in a measurement model (structural equation model). Job accommodations were less feasible for more physical jobs and for heavier industries. Conclusions The pilot administration of the JAS with respect to a hypothetical worker with low back pain showed initial support for its applicability, reliability, and validity when administered to supervisors. Future studies should assess its validity for use in actual disability cases, for a range of health conditions, and to assess different stakeholder opinions about the feasibility of job accommodation strategies.",
keywords = "Evaluation, Job accommodation, Return to work, Scales, Supervisor, Task modification",
author = "Shaw, {William S.} and Kristman, {Vicki L.} and Kelly Williams-Whitt and Sophie Soklaridis and Yueng-hsiang Huang and Pierre C{\^o}t{\'e} and Patrick Loisel",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10926-014-9508-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "755--765",
journal = "Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation",
issn = "1053-0487",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Job Accommodation Scale (JAS)

T2 - Psychometric Evaluation of a New Measure of Employer Support for Temporary Job Modifications

AU - Shaw, William S.

AU - Kristman, Vicki L.

AU - Williams-Whitt, Kelly

AU - Soklaridis, Sophie

AU - Huang, Yueng-hsiang

AU - Côté, Pierre

AU - Loisel, Patrick

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Introduction An employer offer of temporary job modification is a key strategy for facilitating return-to-work for musculoskeletal conditions, but there are no validated scales to assess the level of support for temporary job modifications across a range of job types and organizations. Objective To pilot test a new 21-item self-report measure [the Job Accommodation Scale (JAS)] to assess its applicability, internal consistency, factor structure, and relation to physical job demands. Methods Supervisors (N = 804, 72.8 % male, mean age = 46) were recruited from 19 employment settings in the USA and Canada and completed a 30-min online survey regarding job modification practices. As part of the survey, supervisors nominated and described a job position they supervised and completed the JAS for a hypothetical worker (in that position) with an episode of low back pain. Job characteristics were derived from the occupational informational network job classification database. Results The full response range (1–4) was utilized on all 21 items, with no ceiling or floor effects. Avoiding awkward postures was the most feasible accommodation and moving the employee to a different site or location was the least feasible. An exploratory factor analysis suggested five underlying factors (Modify physical workload; Modify work environment; Modify work schedule; Find alternate work; and Arrange for assistance), and there was an acceptable goodness-of-fit for the five parceled sub-factor scores as a single latent construct in a measurement model (structural equation model). Job accommodations were less feasible for more physical jobs and for heavier industries. Conclusions The pilot administration of the JAS with respect to a hypothetical worker with low back pain showed initial support for its applicability, reliability, and validity when administered to supervisors. Future studies should assess its validity for use in actual disability cases, for a range of health conditions, and to assess different stakeholder opinions about the feasibility of job accommodation strategies.

AB - Introduction An employer offer of temporary job modification is a key strategy for facilitating return-to-work for musculoskeletal conditions, but there are no validated scales to assess the level of support for temporary job modifications across a range of job types and organizations. Objective To pilot test a new 21-item self-report measure [the Job Accommodation Scale (JAS)] to assess its applicability, internal consistency, factor structure, and relation to physical job demands. Methods Supervisors (N = 804, 72.8 % male, mean age = 46) were recruited from 19 employment settings in the USA and Canada and completed a 30-min online survey regarding job modification practices. As part of the survey, supervisors nominated and described a job position they supervised and completed the JAS for a hypothetical worker (in that position) with an episode of low back pain. Job characteristics were derived from the occupational informational network job classification database. Results The full response range (1–4) was utilized on all 21 items, with no ceiling or floor effects. Avoiding awkward postures was the most feasible accommodation and moving the employee to a different site or location was the least feasible. An exploratory factor analysis suggested five underlying factors (Modify physical workload; Modify work environment; Modify work schedule; Find alternate work; and Arrange for assistance), and there was an acceptable goodness-of-fit for the five parceled sub-factor scores as a single latent construct in a measurement model (structural equation model). Job accommodations were less feasible for more physical jobs and for heavier industries. Conclusions The pilot administration of the JAS with respect to a hypothetical worker with low back pain showed initial support for its applicability, reliability, and validity when administered to supervisors. Future studies should assess its validity for use in actual disability cases, for a range of health conditions, and to assess different stakeholder opinions about the feasibility of job accommodation strategies.

KW - Evaluation

KW - Job accommodation

KW - Return to work

KW - Scales

KW - Supervisor

KW - Task modification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896410503&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896410503&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10926-014-9508-7

DO - 10.1007/s10926-014-9508-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 24643785

AN - SCOPUS:84896410503

VL - 24

SP - 755

EP - 765

JO - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

SN - 1053-0487

IS - 4

ER -