The intersection between response inhibition and substance use among adolescents

Kristine Rømer Thomsen, Tine Blom Osterland, Morten Hesse, Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Problems related to the capacity to successfully engage response inhibition are considered a risk factor for the development of substance use disorders (SUDs), but the evidence has been predominantly cross-sectional. In this commentary, we argue that recent longitudinal studies with multi-modal measures of response inhibition can improve understanding of how response inhibition may intersect with substance use among adolescents. Most Stop-Signal studies suggest that slower response inhibition predicts substance use progressions, with one multi-site study showing greater fronto-parietal activity indicative of risk. Most Go-NoGo studies suggest that blunted activation of prefrontal cortical areas during response inhibition predicts substance use progressions, while commission errors are less effective in identifying adolescents at risk. Studies differ in subject populations, outcome measures, statistical methods, and BOLD response contrasts, which challenge the capacity to compare and generalize findings. We encourage research teams throughout the globe to undertake multi-modal, longitudinal studies to assess brain functioning with large sample sizes, and when possible, before significant substance use potentially obscures interpretation of findings. Systematic review and meta-analysis of this growing literature are also important goals for future research.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages228-230
Number of pages3
JournalAddictive Behaviors
Volume78
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Longitudinal Studies
Brain
Statistical methods
Chemical activation
Sample Size
Substance-Related Disorders
Meta-Analysis
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Inhibition (Psychology)
Research
Population

Keywords

  • Adolescents
  • fMRI
  • Longitudinal
  • Response inhibition
  • Risk factors
  • Substance use

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Toxicology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

The intersection between response inhibition and substance use among adolescents. / Rømer Thomsen, Kristine; Blom Osterland, Tine; Hesse, Morten; Feldstein Ewing, Sarah W.

In: Addictive Behaviors, Vol. 78, 01.03.2018, p. 228-230.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rømer Thomsen, Kristine ; Blom Osterland, Tine ; Hesse, Morten ; Feldstein Ewing, Sarah W./ The intersection between response inhibition and substance use among adolescents. In: Addictive Behaviors. 2018 ; Vol. 78. pp. 228-230
@article{898458bbae27487da5f0774cf911c6ef,
title = "The intersection between response inhibition and substance use among adolescents",
abstract = "Problems related to the capacity to successfully engage response inhibition are considered a risk factor for the development of substance use disorders (SUDs), but the evidence has been predominantly cross-sectional. In this commentary, we argue that recent longitudinal studies with multi-modal measures of response inhibition can improve understanding of how response inhibition may intersect with substance use among adolescents. Most Stop-Signal studies suggest that slower response inhibition predicts substance use progressions, with one multi-site study showing greater fronto-parietal activity indicative of risk. Most Go-NoGo studies suggest that blunted activation of prefrontal cortical areas during response inhibition predicts substance use progressions, while commission errors are less effective in identifying adolescents at risk. Studies differ in subject populations, outcome measures, statistical methods, and BOLD response contrasts, which challenge the capacity to compare and generalize findings. We encourage research teams throughout the globe to undertake multi-modal, longitudinal studies to assess brain functioning with large sample sizes, and when possible, before significant substance use potentially obscures interpretation of findings. Systematic review and meta-analysis of this growing literature are also important goals for future research.",
keywords = "Adolescents, fMRI, Longitudinal, Response inhibition, Risk factors, Substance use",
author = "{R\{o}mer Thomsen}, Kristine and {Blom Osterland}, Tine and Morten Hesse and {Feldstein Ewing}, {Sarah W.}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.11.043",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "228--230",
journal = "Addictive Behaviors",
issn = "0306-4603",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The intersection between response inhibition and substance use among adolescents

AU - Rømer Thomsen,Kristine

AU - Blom Osterland,Tine

AU - Hesse,Morten

AU - Feldstein Ewing,Sarah W.

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Problems related to the capacity to successfully engage response inhibition are considered a risk factor for the development of substance use disorders (SUDs), but the evidence has been predominantly cross-sectional. In this commentary, we argue that recent longitudinal studies with multi-modal measures of response inhibition can improve understanding of how response inhibition may intersect with substance use among adolescents. Most Stop-Signal studies suggest that slower response inhibition predicts substance use progressions, with one multi-site study showing greater fronto-parietal activity indicative of risk. Most Go-NoGo studies suggest that blunted activation of prefrontal cortical areas during response inhibition predicts substance use progressions, while commission errors are less effective in identifying adolescents at risk. Studies differ in subject populations, outcome measures, statistical methods, and BOLD response contrasts, which challenge the capacity to compare and generalize findings. We encourage research teams throughout the globe to undertake multi-modal, longitudinal studies to assess brain functioning with large sample sizes, and when possible, before significant substance use potentially obscures interpretation of findings. Systematic review and meta-analysis of this growing literature are also important goals for future research.

AB - Problems related to the capacity to successfully engage response inhibition are considered a risk factor for the development of substance use disorders (SUDs), but the evidence has been predominantly cross-sectional. In this commentary, we argue that recent longitudinal studies with multi-modal measures of response inhibition can improve understanding of how response inhibition may intersect with substance use among adolescents. Most Stop-Signal studies suggest that slower response inhibition predicts substance use progressions, with one multi-site study showing greater fronto-parietal activity indicative of risk. Most Go-NoGo studies suggest that blunted activation of prefrontal cortical areas during response inhibition predicts substance use progressions, while commission errors are less effective in identifying adolescents at risk. Studies differ in subject populations, outcome measures, statistical methods, and BOLD response contrasts, which challenge the capacity to compare and generalize findings. We encourage research teams throughout the globe to undertake multi-modal, longitudinal studies to assess brain functioning with large sample sizes, and when possible, before significant substance use potentially obscures interpretation of findings. Systematic review and meta-analysis of this growing literature are also important goals for future research.

KW - Adolescents

KW - fMRI

KW - Longitudinal

KW - Response inhibition

KW - Risk factors

KW - Substance use

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036631599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85036631599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.11.043

DO - 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.11.043

M3 - Article

VL - 78

SP - 228

EP - 230

JO - Addictive Behaviors

T2 - Addictive Behaviors

JF - Addictive Behaviors

SN - 0306-4603

ER -