The impact of hydrosalpinx on successful pregnancy in tubal factor infertility treated by in vitro fertilization

Andrew S. Blazar, Joseph W. Hogan, David Seifer, Gary N. Frishman, Carol A. Wheeler, Ray V. Haning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine the impact of hydrosalpinx on pregnancy rates in patients undergoing IVF for infertility caused by tubal disease. Design: Review of the records of all patients who had undergone IVF for tubal factor infertility at our institution between May 1988 and October 1994. Setting: A university-sponsored, hospital-based IVF facility. Patient(s): Two hundred fifty patients were identified with infertility due to tubal disease; 67 of these had at least one documented hydrosalpinx whereas the remaining 183 did not. Main Outcome Measure(s): Numbers of oocytes retrieved and fertilized, the number of embryos transferred and implanting, and resulting pregnancy rates. Result(s): The groups were similar in age and cycle cancellation rates. The patients with hydrosalpinx had greater numbers of oocytes retrieved per cycle (15.0 versus 11.6) and embryos transferred per cycle then those without hydrosalpinges (4.21 versus 3.98). The hydrosalpinx group also undertook more cycles per patient (2.31 versus 1.96). Fertilization rates between the two groups were similar, but implantation rates were decreased in those with hydrosalpinx (8.5% versus 11.2%). Conclusion(s): Hydrosalpinx did not result in impaired ovarian stimulation or decreased oocyte fertilization. It did, however, interfere with implantation and reduce to some degree the success of IVF in achieving an ongoing pregnancy. The validity of routine salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx is debatable, but its use in selected individuals may well be appropriate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)517-520
Number of pages4
JournalFertility and Sterility
Volume67
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tubal Pregnancy
Fertilization in Vitro
Infertility
Oocytes
Pregnancy Rate
Fertilization
Embryonic Structures
Salpingectomy
Ovulation Induction
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pregnancy

Keywords

  • embryo implantation
  • hydrosalpinx
  • in vitro fertilization
  • Tubal factor infertility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

The impact of hydrosalpinx on successful pregnancy in tubal factor infertility treated by in vitro fertilization. / Blazar, Andrew S.; Hogan, Joseph W.; Seifer, David; Frishman, Gary N.; Wheeler, Carol A.; Haning, Ray V.

In: Fertility and Sterility, Vol. 67, No. 3, 1997, p. 517-520.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blazar, Andrew S. ; Hogan, Joseph W. ; Seifer, David ; Frishman, Gary N. ; Wheeler, Carol A. ; Haning, Ray V. / The impact of hydrosalpinx on successful pregnancy in tubal factor infertility treated by in vitro fertilization. In: Fertility and Sterility. 1997 ; Vol. 67, No. 3. pp. 517-520.
@article{bed6054596544e0f86124ab6b5a9173d,
title = "The impact of hydrosalpinx on successful pregnancy in tubal factor infertility treated by in vitro fertilization",
abstract = "Objective: To determine the impact of hydrosalpinx on pregnancy rates in patients undergoing IVF for infertility caused by tubal disease. Design: Review of the records of all patients who had undergone IVF for tubal factor infertility at our institution between May 1988 and October 1994. Setting: A university-sponsored, hospital-based IVF facility. Patient(s): Two hundred fifty patients were identified with infertility due to tubal disease; 67 of these had at least one documented hydrosalpinx whereas the remaining 183 did not. Main Outcome Measure(s): Numbers of oocytes retrieved and fertilized, the number of embryos transferred and implanting, and resulting pregnancy rates. Result(s): The groups were similar in age and cycle cancellation rates. The patients with hydrosalpinx had greater numbers of oocytes retrieved per cycle (15.0 versus 11.6) and embryos transferred per cycle then those without hydrosalpinges (4.21 versus 3.98). The hydrosalpinx group also undertook more cycles per patient (2.31 versus 1.96). Fertilization rates between the two groups were similar, but implantation rates were decreased in those with hydrosalpinx (8.5{\%} versus 11.2{\%}). Conclusion(s): Hydrosalpinx did not result in impaired ovarian stimulation or decreased oocyte fertilization. It did, however, interfere with implantation and reduce to some degree the success of IVF in achieving an ongoing pregnancy. The validity of routine salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx is debatable, but its use in selected individuals may well be appropriate.",
keywords = "embryo implantation, hydrosalpinx, in vitro fertilization, Tubal factor infertility",
author = "Blazar, {Andrew S.} and Hogan, {Joseph W.} and David Seifer and Frishman, {Gary N.} and Wheeler, {Carol A.} and Haning, {Ray V.}",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1016/S0015-0282(97)80079-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "517--520",
journal = "Fertility and Sterility",
issn = "0015-0282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of hydrosalpinx on successful pregnancy in tubal factor infertility treated by in vitro fertilization

AU - Blazar, Andrew S.

AU - Hogan, Joseph W.

AU - Seifer, David

AU - Frishman, Gary N.

AU - Wheeler, Carol A.

AU - Haning, Ray V.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Objective: To determine the impact of hydrosalpinx on pregnancy rates in patients undergoing IVF for infertility caused by tubal disease. Design: Review of the records of all patients who had undergone IVF for tubal factor infertility at our institution between May 1988 and October 1994. Setting: A university-sponsored, hospital-based IVF facility. Patient(s): Two hundred fifty patients were identified with infertility due to tubal disease; 67 of these had at least one documented hydrosalpinx whereas the remaining 183 did not. Main Outcome Measure(s): Numbers of oocytes retrieved and fertilized, the number of embryos transferred and implanting, and resulting pregnancy rates. Result(s): The groups were similar in age and cycle cancellation rates. The patients with hydrosalpinx had greater numbers of oocytes retrieved per cycle (15.0 versus 11.6) and embryos transferred per cycle then those without hydrosalpinges (4.21 versus 3.98). The hydrosalpinx group also undertook more cycles per patient (2.31 versus 1.96). Fertilization rates between the two groups were similar, but implantation rates were decreased in those with hydrosalpinx (8.5% versus 11.2%). Conclusion(s): Hydrosalpinx did not result in impaired ovarian stimulation or decreased oocyte fertilization. It did, however, interfere with implantation and reduce to some degree the success of IVF in achieving an ongoing pregnancy. The validity of routine salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx is debatable, but its use in selected individuals may well be appropriate.

AB - Objective: To determine the impact of hydrosalpinx on pregnancy rates in patients undergoing IVF for infertility caused by tubal disease. Design: Review of the records of all patients who had undergone IVF for tubal factor infertility at our institution between May 1988 and October 1994. Setting: A university-sponsored, hospital-based IVF facility. Patient(s): Two hundred fifty patients were identified with infertility due to tubal disease; 67 of these had at least one documented hydrosalpinx whereas the remaining 183 did not. Main Outcome Measure(s): Numbers of oocytes retrieved and fertilized, the number of embryos transferred and implanting, and resulting pregnancy rates. Result(s): The groups were similar in age and cycle cancellation rates. The patients with hydrosalpinx had greater numbers of oocytes retrieved per cycle (15.0 versus 11.6) and embryos transferred per cycle then those without hydrosalpinges (4.21 versus 3.98). The hydrosalpinx group also undertook more cycles per patient (2.31 versus 1.96). Fertilization rates between the two groups were similar, but implantation rates were decreased in those with hydrosalpinx (8.5% versus 11.2%). Conclusion(s): Hydrosalpinx did not result in impaired ovarian stimulation or decreased oocyte fertilization. It did, however, interfere with implantation and reduce to some degree the success of IVF in achieving an ongoing pregnancy. The validity of routine salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx is debatable, but its use in selected individuals may well be appropriate.

KW - embryo implantation

KW - hydrosalpinx

KW - in vitro fertilization

KW - Tubal factor infertility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031028862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031028862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)80079-9

DO - 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)80079-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 9091340

AN - SCOPUS:0031028862

VL - 67

SP - 517

EP - 520

JO - Fertility and Sterility

JF - Fertility and Sterility

SN - 0015-0282

IS - 3

ER -