The Global Spine Care Initiative

classification system for spine-related concerns

Scott Haldeman, Claire D. Johnson, Roger Chou, Margareta Nordin, Pierre Côté, Eric L. Hurwitz, Bart N. Green, Deborah Kopansky-Giles, Christine Cedraschi, Ellen Aartun, Emre Acaroğlu, Arthur Ameis, Selim Ayhan, Fiona Blyth, David Borenstein, O’Dane D. Brady, Fereydoun Davatchi, Christine Goertz, Najia Hajjaj-Hassouni, Jan Hartvigsen & 16 others Maria Hondras, Nadège Lemeunier, John Mayer, Silvano Mior, Tiro Mmopelwa, Michael Modic, Rajani Mullerpatan, Lillian Mwaniki, Madeleine Ngandeu-Singwe, Geoff Outerbridge, Kristi Randhawa, Erkin Sönmez, Carlos Torres, Paola Torres, William Watters, Hainan Yu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this report is to describe the development of a classification system that would apply to anyone with a spine-related concern and that can be used in an evidence-based spine care pathway. Methods: Existing classification systems for spinal disorders were assembled. A seed document was developed through round-table discussions followed by a modified Delphi process. International and interprofessional clinicians and scientists with expertise in spine-related conditions were invited to participate. Results: Thirty-six experts from 15 countries participated. After the second round, there was 95% agreement of the proposed classification system. The six major classifications included: no or minimal symptoms (class 0); mild symptoms (i.e., neck or back pain) but no interference with activities (class I); moderate or severe symptoms with interference of activities (class II); spine-related neurological signs or symptoms (class III); severe bony spine deformity, trauma or pathology (class IV); and spine-related symptoms or destructive lesions associated with systemic pathology (class V). Subclasses for each major class included chronicity and severity when different interventions were anticipated or recommended. Conclusions: An international and interprofessional group developed a comprehensive classification system for all potential presentations of people who may seek care or advice at a spine care program. This classification can be used in the development of a spine care pathway, in clinical practice, and for research purposes. This classification needs to be tested for validity, reliability, and consistency among clinicians from different specialties and in different communities and cultures. Graphical abstract: These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.[Figure not available: see fulltext.].

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)889-900
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Spine Journal
Volume27
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Spine
Pathology
Critical Pathways
Neck Pain
Back Pain
Reproducibility of Results
Signs and Symptoms
Seeds
Wounds and Injuries
Research

Keywords

  • Back pain
  • Critical pathways
  • Delphi technique
  • Neck pain
  • Spinal diseases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Haldeman, S., Johnson, C. D., Chou, R., Nordin, M., Côté, P., Hurwitz, E. L., ... Yu, H. (2018). The Global Spine Care Initiative: classification system for spine-related concerns. European Spine Journal, 27, 889-900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5724-8

The Global Spine Care Initiative : classification system for spine-related concerns. / Haldeman, Scott; Johnson, Claire D.; Chou, Roger; Nordin, Margareta; Côté, Pierre; Hurwitz, Eric L.; Green, Bart N.; Kopansky-Giles, Deborah; Cedraschi, Christine; Aartun, Ellen; Acaroğlu, Emre; Ameis, Arthur; Ayhan, Selim; Blyth, Fiona; Borenstein, David; Brady, O’Dane D.; Davatchi, Fereydoun; Goertz, Christine; Hajjaj-Hassouni, Najia; Hartvigsen, Jan; Hondras, Maria; Lemeunier, Nadège; Mayer, John; Mior, Silvano; Mmopelwa, Tiro; Modic, Michael; Mullerpatan, Rajani; Mwaniki, Lillian; Ngandeu-Singwe, Madeleine; Outerbridge, Geoff; Randhawa, Kristi; Sönmez, Erkin; Torres, Carlos; Torres, Paola; Watters, William; Yu, Hainan.

In: European Spine Journal, Vol. 27, 01.09.2018, p. 889-900.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Haldeman, S, Johnson, CD, Chou, R, Nordin, M, Côté, P, Hurwitz, EL, Green, BN, Kopansky-Giles, D, Cedraschi, C, Aartun, E, Acaroğlu, E, Ameis, A, Ayhan, S, Blyth, F, Borenstein, D, Brady, ODD, Davatchi, F, Goertz, C, Hajjaj-Hassouni, N, Hartvigsen, J, Hondras, M, Lemeunier, N, Mayer, J, Mior, S, Mmopelwa, T, Modic, M, Mullerpatan, R, Mwaniki, L, Ngandeu-Singwe, M, Outerbridge, G, Randhawa, K, Sönmez, E, Torres, C, Torres, P, Watters, W & Yu, H 2018, 'The Global Spine Care Initiative: classification system for spine-related concerns', European Spine Journal, vol. 27, pp. 889-900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5724-8
Haldeman, Scott ; Johnson, Claire D. ; Chou, Roger ; Nordin, Margareta ; Côté, Pierre ; Hurwitz, Eric L. ; Green, Bart N. ; Kopansky-Giles, Deborah ; Cedraschi, Christine ; Aartun, Ellen ; Acaroğlu, Emre ; Ameis, Arthur ; Ayhan, Selim ; Blyth, Fiona ; Borenstein, David ; Brady, O’Dane D. ; Davatchi, Fereydoun ; Goertz, Christine ; Hajjaj-Hassouni, Najia ; Hartvigsen, Jan ; Hondras, Maria ; Lemeunier, Nadège ; Mayer, John ; Mior, Silvano ; Mmopelwa, Tiro ; Modic, Michael ; Mullerpatan, Rajani ; Mwaniki, Lillian ; Ngandeu-Singwe, Madeleine ; Outerbridge, Geoff ; Randhawa, Kristi ; Sönmez, Erkin ; Torres, Carlos ; Torres, Paola ; Watters, William ; Yu, Hainan. / The Global Spine Care Initiative : classification system for spine-related concerns. In: European Spine Journal. 2018 ; Vol. 27. pp. 889-900.
@article{e1fd21aa573f45c9a755c03615a389a9,
title = "The Global Spine Care Initiative: classification system for spine-related concerns",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this report is to describe the development of a classification system that would apply to anyone with a spine-related concern and that can be used in an evidence-based spine care pathway. Methods: Existing classification systems for spinal disorders were assembled. A seed document was developed through round-table discussions followed by a modified Delphi process. International and interprofessional clinicians and scientists with expertise in spine-related conditions were invited to participate. Results: Thirty-six experts from 15 countries participated. After the second round, there was 95{\%} agreement of the proposed classification system. The six major classifications included: no or minimal symptoms (class 0); mild symptoms (i.e., neck or back pain) but no interference with activities (class I); moderate or severe symptoms with interference of activities (class II); spine-related neurological signs or symptoms (class III); severe bony spine deformity, trauma or pathology (class IV); and spine-related symptoms or destructive lesions associated with systemic pathology (class V). Subclasses for each major class included chronicity and severity when different interventions were anticipated or recommended. Conclusions: An international and interprofessional group developed a comprehensive classification system for all potential presentations of people who may seek care or advice at a spine care program. This classification can be used in the development of a spine care pathway, in clinical practice, and for research purposes. This classification needs to be tested for validity, reliability, and consistency among clinicians from different specialties and in different communities and cultures. Graphical abstract: These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.[Figure not available: see fulltext.].",
keywords = "Back pain, Critical pathways, Delphi technique, Neck pain, Spinal diseases",
author = "Scott Haldeman and Johnson, {Claire D.} and Roger Chou and Margareta Nordin and Pierre C{\^o}t{\'e} and Hurwitz, {Eric L.} and Green, {Bart N.} and Deborah Kopansky-Giles and Christine Cedraschi and Ellen Aartun and Emre Acaroğlu and Arthur Ameis and Selim Ayhan and Fiona Blyth and David Borenstein and Brady, {O’Dane D.} and Fereydoun Davatchi and Christine Goertz and Najia Hajjaj-Hassouni and Jan Hartvigsen and Maria Hondras and Nad{\`e}ge Lemeunier and John Mayer and Silvano Mior and Tiro Mmopelwa and Michael Modic and Rajani Mullerpatan and Lillian Mwaniki and Madeleine Ngandeu-Singwe and Geoff Outerbridge and Kristi Randhawa and Erkin S{\"o}nmez and Carlos Torres and Paola Torres and William Watters and Hainan Yu",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00586-018-5724-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "889--900",
journal = "European Spine Journal",
issn = "0940-6719",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Global Spine Care Initiative

T2 - classification system for spine-related concerns

AU - Haldeman, Scott

AU - Johnson, Claire D.

AU - Chou, Roger

AU - Nordin, Margareta

AU - Côté, Pierre

AU - Hurwitz, Eric L.

AU - Green, Bart N.

AU - Kopansky-Giles, Deborah

AU - Cedraschi, Christine

AU - Aartun, Ellen

AU - Acaroğlu, Emre

AU - Ameis, Arthur

AU - Ayhan, Selim

AU - Blyth, Fiona

AU - Borenstein, David

AU - Brady, O’Dane D.

AU - Davatchi, Fereydoun

AU - Goertz, Christine

AU - Hajjaj-Hassouni, Najia

AU - Hartvigsen, Jan

AU - Hondras, Maria

AU - Lemeunier, Nadège

AU - Mayer, John

AU - Mior, Silvano

AU - Mmopelwa, Tiro

AU - Modic, Michael

AU - Mullerpatan, Rajani

AU - Mwaniki, Lillian

AU - Ngandeu-Singwe, Madeleine

AU - Outerbridge, Geoff

AU - Randhawa, Kristi

AU - Sönmez, Erkin

AU - Torres, Carlos

AU - Torres, Paola

AU - Watters, William

AU - Yu, Hainan

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this report is to describe the development of a classification system that would apply to anyone with a spine-related concern and that can be used in an evidence-based spine care pathway. Methods: Existing classification systems for spinal disorders were assembled. A seed document was developed through round-table discussions followed by a modified Delphi process. International and interprofessional clinicians and scientists with expertise in spine-related conditions were invited to participate. Results: Thirty-six experts from 15 countries participated. After the second round, there was 95% agreement of the proposed classification system. The six major classifications included: no or minimal symptoms (class 0); mild symptoms (i.e., neck or back pain) but no interference with activities (class I); moderate or severe symptoms with interference of activities (class II); spine-related neurological signs or symptoms (class III); severe bony spine deformity, trauma or pathology (class IV); and spine-related symptoms or destructive lesions associated with systemic pathology (class V). Subclasses for each major class included chronicity and severity when different interventions were anticipated or recommended. Conclusions: An international and interprofessional group developed a comprehensive classification system for all potential presentations of people who may seek care or advice at a spine care program. This classification can be used in the development of a spine care pathway, in clinical practice, and for research purposes. This classification needs to be tested for validity, reliability, and consistency among clinicians from different specialties and in different communities and cultures. Graphical abstract: These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.[Figure not available: see fulltext.].

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this report is to describe the development of a classification system that would apply to anyone with a spine-related concern and that can be used in an evidence-based spine care pathway. Methods: Existing classification systems for spinal disorders were assembled. A seed document was developed through round-table discussions followed by a modified Delphi process. International and interprofessional clinicians and scientists with expertise in spine-related conditions were invited to participate. Results: Thirty-six experts from 15 countries participated. After the second round, there was 95% agreement of the proposed classification system. The six major classifications included: no or minimal symptoms (class 0); mild symptoms (i.e., neck or back pain) but no interference with activities (class I); moderate or severe symptoms with interference of activities (class II); spine-related neurological signs or symptoms (class III); severe bony spine deformity, trauma or pathology (class IV); and spine-related symptoms or destructive lesions associated with systemic pathology (class V). Subclasses for each major class included chronicity and severity when different interventions were anticipated or recommended. Conclusions: An international and interprofessional group developed a comprehensive classification system for all potential presentations of people who may seek care or advice at a spine care program. This classification can be used in the development of a spine care pathway, in clinical practice, and for research purposes. This classification needs to be tested for validity, reliability, and consistency among clinicians from different specialties and in different communities and cultures. Graphical abstract: These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.[Figure not available: see fulltext.].

KW - Back pain

KW - Critical pathways

KW - Delphi technique

KW - Neck pain

KW - Spinal diseases

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051505641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051505641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00586-018-5724-8

DO - 10.1007/s00586-018-5724-8

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 889

EP - 900

JO - European Spine Journal

JF - European Spine Journal

SN - 0940-6719

ER -