The endogenous melatonin profile as a marker for circadian phase position

Alfred Lewy, Neil L. Cutler, Robert Sack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

231 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several circadian rhythms have been used to assess the phase of the endogenous circadian pacemaker (ECP). However, when more than one marker rhythm is measured, results do not always agree. Questions then inevitably arise. Are there multiple oscillators? Are some markers more reliable than others? Masking is a problem for all marker rhythms. Masking of melatonin is minimized by sampling under dim light. The dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO) is particularly convenient since it can usually be obtained before sleep. However, assessing the DLMO in low melatonin producers may be problematic, particularly with the commonly used operationally defined threshold of 10 pg/ml. This study evaluates various circadian phase markers provided by the plasma melatonin profile in 14 individuals, several of whom are low melatonin producers. The amount (amplitude) of melatonin production appears to influence the phase of many points on the melatonin profile. Accordingly, when low producers are in a data set, we now prefer a lower DLMO threshold than the one previously recommended (10 pg/ml). Indeed, there are some low producers who never exceed this threshold at any time. Radioimmunoassays are now available that have the requisite sensitivity and specificity to support the use of a lower threshold. Nevertheless, the dim-light melatonin offset (DLMOff), even when operationally defined at thresholds less than 10 pg/ml, appears to be confounded by amplitude in this study; in such cases, it may be preferable to use the melatonin synthesis offset (SynOff) because it is not confounded by amplitude and because, theoretically, it is temporally closer to the endogenous mechanism signaling the offset of production. The question of whether the termination mechanism of melatonin synthesis is related to an interval timer or to a second oscillator loosely coupled to the onset oscillator is probably best answered using the SynOff rather than the DLMOff. It is hoped that these findings will make a useful contribution to the debate on the best ways to use points on the melatonin profile to assess circadian phase position in humans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)227-236
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Biological Rhythms
Volume14
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 1999

Fingerprint

melatonin
Melatonin
Light
synthesis
timers
Circadian Rhythm
sleep
radioimmunoassays
circadian rhythm
Radioimmunoassay
Sleep

Keywords

  • Circadian phase
  • Dim-light melatonin offset (DLMOff)
  • Dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO)
  • Melatonin
  • Melatonin amplitude
  • Melatonin assays
  • Melatonin duration
  • Melatonin synthesis offset (SynOff)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

The endogenous melatonin profile as a marker for circadian phase position. / Lewy, Alfred; Cutler, Neil L.; Sack, Robert.

In: Journal of Biological Rhythms, Vol. 14, No. 3, 06.1999, p. 227-236.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lewy, A, Cutler, NL & Sack, R 1999, 'The endogenous melatonin profile as a marker for circadian phase position', Journal of Biological Rhythms, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 227-236.
Lewy, Alfred ; Cutler, Neil L. ; Sack, Robert. / The endogenous melatonin profile as a marker for circadian phase position. In: Journal of Biological Rhythms. 1999 ; Vol. 14, No. 3. pp. 227-236.
@article{b955d99501bf4f468be39b9077c9d8e7,
title = "The endogenous melatonin profile as a marker for circadian phase position",
abstract = "Several circadian rhythms have been used to assess the phase of the endogenous circadian pacemaker (ECP). However, when more than one marker rhythm is measured, results do not always agree. Questions then inevitably arise. Are there multiple oscillators? Are some markers more reliable than others? Masking is a problem for all marker rhythms. Masking of melatonin is minimized by sampling under dim light. The dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO) is particularly convenient since it can usually be obtained before sleep. However, assessing the DLMO in low melatonin producers may be problematic, particularly with the commonly used operationally defined threshold of 10 pg/ml. This study evaluates various circadian phase markers provided by the plasma melatonin profile in 14 individuals, several of whom are low melatonin producers. The amount (amplitude) of melatonin production appears to influence the phase of many points on the melatonin profile. Accordingly, when low producers are in a data set, we now prefer a lower DLMO threshold than the one previously recommended (10 pg/ml). Indeed, there are some low producers who never exceed this threshold at any time. Radioimmunoassays are now available that have the requisite sensitivity and specificity to support the use of a lower threshold. Nevertheless, the dim-light melatonin offset (DLMOff), even when operationally defined at thresholds less than 10 pg/ml, appears to be confounded by amplitude in this study; in such cases, it may be preferable to use the melatonin synthesis offset (SynOff) because it is not confounded by amplitude and because, theoretically, it is temporally closer to the endogenous mechanism signaling the offset of production. The question of whether the termination mechanism of melatonin synthesis is related to an interval timer or to a second oscillator loosely coupled to the onset oscillator is probably best answered using the SynOff rather than the DLMOff. It is hoped that these findings will make a useful contribution to the debate on the best ways to use points on the melatonin profile to assess circadian phase position in humans.",
keywords = "Circadian phase, Dim-light melatonin offset (DLMOff), Dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO), Melatonin, Melatonin amplitude, Melatonin assays, Melatonin duration, Melatonin synthesis offset (SynOff)",
author = "Alfred Lewy and Cutler, {Neil L.} and Robert Sack",
year = "1999",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "227--236",
journal = "Journal of Biological Rhythms",
issn = "0748-7304",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The endogenous melatonin profile as a marker for circadian phase position

AU - Lewy, Alfred

AU - Cutler, Neil L.

AU - Sack, Robert

PY - 1999/6

Y1 - 1999/6

N2 - Several circadian rhythms have been used to assess the phase of the endogenous circadian pacemaker (ECP). However, when more than one marker rhythm is measured, results do not always agree. Questions then inevitably arise. Are there multiple oscillators? Are some markers more reliable than others? Masking is a problem for all marker rhythms. Masking of melatonin is minimized by sampling under dim light. The dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO) is particularly convenient since it can usually be obtained before sleep. However, assessing the DLMO in low melatonin producers may be problematic, particularly with the commonly used operationally defined threshold of 10 pg/ml. This study evaluates various circadian phase markers provided by the plasma melatonin profile in 14 individuals, several of whom are low melatonin producers. The amount (amplitude) of melatonin production appears to influence the phase of many points on the melatonin profile. Accordingly, when low producers are in a data set, we now prefer a lower DLMO threshold than the one previously recommended (10 pg/ml). Indeed, there are some low producers who never exceed this threshold at any time. Radioimmunoassays are now available that have the requisite sensitivity and specificity to support the use of a lower threshold. Nevertheless, the dim-light melatonin offset (DLMOff), even when operationally defined at thresholds less than 10 pg/ml, appears to be confounded by amplitude in this study; in such cases, it may be preferable to use the melatonin synthesis offset (SynOff) because it is not confounded by amplitude and because, theoretically, it is temporally closer to the endogenous mechanism signaling the offset of production. The question of whether the termination mechanism of melatonin synthesis is related to an interval timer or to a second oscillator loosely coupled to the onset oscillator is probably best answered using the SynOff rather than the DLMOff. It is hoped that these findings will make a useful contribution to the debate on the best ways to use points on the melatonin profile to assess circadian phase position in humans.

AB - Several circadian rhythms have been used to assess the phase of the endogenous circadian pacemaker (ECP). However, when more than one marker rhythm is measured, results do not always agree. Questions then inevitably arise. Are there multiple oscillators? Are some markers more reliable than others? Masking is a problem for all marker rhythms. Masking of melatonin is minimized by sampling under dim light. The dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO) is particularly convenient since it can usually be obtained before sleep. However, assessing the DLMO in low melatonin producers may be problematic, particularly with the commonly used operationally defined threshold of 10 pg/ml. This study evaluates various circadian phase markers provided by the plasma melatonin profile in 14 individuals, several of whom are low melatonin producers. The amount (amplitude) of melatonin production appears to influence the phase of many points on the melatonin profile. Accordingly, when low producers are in a data set, we now prefer a lower DLMO threshold than the one previously recommended (10 pg/ml). Indeed, there are some low producers who never exceed this threshold at any time. Radioimmunoassays are now available that have the requisite sensitivity and specificity to support the use of a lower threshold. Nevertheless, the dim-light melatonin offset (DLMOff), even when operationally defined at thresholds less than 10 pg/ml, appears to be confounded by amplitude in this study; in such cases, it may be preferable to use the melatonin synthesis offset (SynOff) because it is not confounded by amplitude and because, theoretically, it is temporally closer to the endogenous mechanism signaling the offset of production. The question of whether the termination mechanism of melatonin synthesis is related to an interval timer or to a second oscillator loosely coupled to the onset oscillator is probably best answered using the SynOff rather than the DLMOff. It is hoped that these findings will make a useful contribution to the debate on the best ways to use points on the melatonin profile to assess circadian phase position in humans.

KW - Circadian phase

KW - Dim-light melatonin offset (DLMOff)

KW - Dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO)

KW - Melatonin

KW - Melatonin amplitude

KW - Melatonin assays

KW - Melatonin duration

KW - Melatonin synthesis offset (SynOff)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033153614&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033153614&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 227

EP - 236

JO - Journal of Biological Rhythms

JF - Journal of Biological Rhythms

SN - 0748-7304

IS - 3

ER -