The effort and outcomes of the Pediatric Surgery match process: Are we interviewing too many?

Samir K. Gadepalli, Cynthia D. Downard, Keith A. Thatch, Saleem Islam, Kenneth Azarow, Mike K. Chen, Craig W. Lillehei, Pramod S. Puligandla, Marleta Reynolds, John H. Waldhausen, Keith T. Oldham, Max R. Langham, Thomas F. Tracy, Ronald B. Hirschl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose Increasing numbers of programs participating in the pediatric surgery match has resulted in economic and logistical issues for candidates, General Surgery residencies, and Pediatric Surgery training programs (PSTP). We sought to determine the ideal number of interviews conducted by programs based on resultant rank order lists (ROL) of matched candidates. Methods PSTPs received 4 online surveys regarding interview practices (2011-2012, 2014), and matched candidate ROL (2008-2010, 2012, 2014). Program directors (PD) also provided estimates regarding minimum candidate interview numbers necessary for an effective match (2011-2012, 2014). Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank tests compared ROL and interview numbers conducted. Quartile regression predicted ROL based on the interview numbers. Wilcoxon signed rank-sum tests compared the interview numbers to the minimal interview number using a matched pair. p Values <0.05 were significant. Results Survey response rates ranged from 85-100%. Median ROL of matched candidates (2-3.5) did not differ between programs (p = 0.09) and the lowest matched ROL for any year was 10-12. Interview numbers did not affect the final candidate ROL (p = 0.22). While PDs thought the minimum median interview number should be 20, the number actually conducted was significantly higher (p <0.001). Conclusion These data suggest that PSTPs interview excessive numbers of candidates. Programs and applicants should evaluate mechanisms to reduce interviews to limit costs and effort associated with the match.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1954-1957
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume50
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

Interviews
Pediatrics
Internship and Residency
Nonparametric Statistics
Economics
Education
Costs and Cost Analysis
Population

Keywords

  • Education
  • Interview burden
  • Pediatric Surgery Fellowship
  • Pediatric Surgery Match
  • Program directors
  • Rank list

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Gadepalli, S. K., Downard, C. D., Thatch, K. A., Islam, S., Azarow, K., Chen, M. K., ... Hirschl, R. B. (2015). The effort and outcomes of the Pediatric Surgery match process: Are we interviewing too many? Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 50(11), 1954-1957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.06.008

The effort and outcomes of the Pediatric Surgery match process : Are we interviewing too many? / Gadepalli, Samir K.; Downard, Cynthia D.; Thatch, Keith A.; Islam, Saleem; Azarow, Kenneth; Chen, Mike K.; Lillehei, Craig W.; Puligandla, Pramod S.; Reynolds, Marleta; Waldhausen, John H.; Oldham, Keith T.; Langham, Max R.; Tracy, Thomas F.; Hirschl, Ronald B.

In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Vol. 50, No. 11, 01.11.2015, p. 1954-1957.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gadepalli, SK, Downard, CD, Thatch, KA, Islam, S, Azarow, K, Chen, MK, Lillehei, CW, Puligandla, PS, Reynolds, M, Waldhausen, JH, Oldham, KT, Langham, MR, Tracy, TF & Hirschl, RB 2015, 'The effort and outcomes of the Pediatric Surgery match process: Are we interviewing too many?', Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 1954-1957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.06.008
Gadepalli, Samir K. ; Downard, Cynthia D. ; Thatch, Keith A. ; Islam, Saleem ; Azarow, Kenneth ; Chen, Mike K. ; Lillehei, Craig W. ; Puligandla, Pramod S. ; Reynolds, Marleta ; Waldhausen, John H. ; Oldham, Keith T. ; Langham, Max R. ; Tracy, Thomas F. ; Hirschl, Ronald B. / The effort and outcomes of the Pediatric Surgery match process : Are we interviewing too many?. In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 50, No. 11. pp. 1954-1957.
@article{c6b627dbb72f486cba4ecf5ae2968f66,
title = "The effort and outcomes of the Pediatric Surgery match process: Are we interviewing too many?",
abstract = "Purpose Increasing numbers of programs participating in the pediatric surgery match has resulted in economic and logistical issues for candidates, General Surgery residencies, and Pediatric Surgery training programs (PSTP). We sought to determine the ideal number of interviews conducted by programs based on resultant rank order lists (ROL) of matched candidates. Methods PSTPs received 4 online surveys regarding interview practices (2011-2012, 2014), and matched candidate ROL (2008-2010, 2012, 2014). Program directors (PD) also provided estimates regarding minimum candidate interview numbers necessary for an effective match (2011-2012, 2014). Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank tests compared ROL and interview numbers conducted. Quartile regression predicted ROL based on the interview numbers. Wilcoxon signed rank-sum tests compared the interview numbers to the minimal interview number using a matched pair. p Values <0.05 were significant. Results Survey response rates ranged from 85-100{\%}. Median ROL of matched candidates (2-3.5) did not differ between programs (p = 0.09) and the lowest matched ROL for any year was 10-12. Interview numbers did not affect the final candidate ROL (p = 0.22). While PDs thought the minimum median interview number should be 20, the number actually conducted was significantly higher (p <0.001). Conclusion These data suggest that PSTPs interview excessive numbers of candidates. Programs and applicants should evaluate mechanisms to reduce interviews to limit costs and effort associated with the match.",
keywords = "Education, Interview burden, Pediatric Surgery Fellowship, Pediatric Surgery Match, Program directors, Rank list",
author = "Gadepalli, {Samir K.} and Downard, {Cynthia D.} and Thatch, {Keith A.} and Saleem Islam and Kenneth Azarow and Chen, {Mike K.} and Lillehei, {Craig W.} and Puligandla, {Pramod S.} and Marleta Reynolds and Waldhausen, {John H.} and Oldham, {Keith T.} and Langham, {Max R.} and Tracy, {Thomas F.} and Hirschl, {Ronald B.}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.06.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "1954--1957",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Surgery",
issn = "0022-3468",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effort and outcomes of the Pediatric Surgery match process

T2 - Are we interviewing too many?

AU - Gadepalli, Samir K.

AU - Downard, Cynthia D.

AU - Thatch, Keith A.

AU - Islam, Saleem

AU - Azarow, Kenneth

AU - Chen, Mike K.

AU - Lillehei, Craig W.

AU - Puligandla, Pramod S.

AU - Reynolds, Marleta

AU - Waldhausen, John H.

AU - Oldham, Keith T.

AU - Langham, Max R.

AU - Tracy, Thomas F.

AU - Hirschl, Ronald B.

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Purpose Increasing numbers of programs participating in the pediatric surgery match has resulted in economic and logistical issues for candidates, General Surgery residencies, and Pediatric Surgery training programs (PSTP). We sought to determine the ideal number of interviews conducted by programs based on resultant rank order lists (ROL) of matched candidates. Methods PSTPs received 4 online surveys regarding interview practices (2011-2012, 2014), and matched candidate ROL (2008-2010, 2012, 2014). Program directors (PD) also provided estimates regarding minimum candidate interview numbers necessary for an effective match (2011-2012, 2014). Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank tests compared ROL and interview numbers conducted. Quartile regression predicted ROL based on the interview numbers. Wilcoxon signed rank-sum tests compared the interview numbers to the minimal interview number using a matched pair. p Values <0.05 were significant. Results Survey response rates ranged from 85-100%. Median ROL of matched candidates (2-3.5) did not differ between programs (p = 0.09) and the lowest matched ROL for any year was 10-12. Interview numbers did not affect the final candidate ROL (p = 0.22). While PDs thought the minimum median interview number should be 20, the number actually conducted was significantly higher (p <0.001). Conclusion These data suggest that PSTPs interview excessive numbers of candidates. Programs and applicants should evaluate mechanisms to reduce interviews to limit costs and effort associated with the match.

AB - Purpose Increasing numbers of programs participating in the pediatric surgery match has resulted in economic and logistical issues for candidates, General Surgery residencies, and Pediatric Surgery training programs (PSTP). We sought to determine the ideal number of interviews conducted by programs based on resultant rank order lists (ROL) of matched candidates. Methods PSTPs received 4 online surveys regarding interview practices (2011-2012, 2014), and matched candidate ROL (2008-2010, 2012, 2014). Program directors (PD) also provided estimates regarding minimum candidate interview numbers necessary for an effective match (2011-2012, 2014). Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank tests compared ROL and interview numbers conducted. Quartile regression predicted ROL based on the interview numbers. Wilcoxon signed rank-sum tests compared the interview numbers to the minimal interview number using a matched pair. p Values <0.05 were significant. Results Survey response rates ranged from 85-100%. Median ROL of matched candidates (2-3.5) did not differ between programs (p = 0.09) and the lowest matched ROL for any year was 10-12. Interview numbers did not affect the final candidate ROL (p = 0.22). While PDs thought the minimum median interview number should be 20, the number actually conducted was significantly higher (p <0.001). Conclusion These data suggest that PSTPs interview excessive numbers of candidates. Programs and applicants should evaluate mechanisms to reduce interviews to limit costs and effort associated with the match.

KW - Education

KW - Interview burden

KW - Pediatric Surgery Fellowship

KW - Pediatric Surgery Match

KW - Program directors

KW - Rank list

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953363107&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953363107&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.06.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.06.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 26165158

AN - SCOPUS:84953363107

VL - 50

SP - 1954

EP - 1957

JO - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

JF - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

SN - 0022-3468

IS - 11

ER -