The effectiveness of grenz ray therapy for chronic dermatoses of the hands and feet

Brenda M. Simpson, Shannon K. Foster, Cindi N. Chapman, Eric Simpson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Grenz ray therapy (GRT) has been used for inflammatory and neoplastic dermatologic diseases for over 100 years. Its use is declining, possibly because of the difficulties maintaining radiation certification and insurance coverage. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of GRT in chronic inflammatory dermatoses of the hands and feet. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients treated with GRT at the Oregon Health & Science University from 2006 to 2009. Candidates identified for the study were then mailed questionnaires to supplement data acquired from chart review. Results: Most patients (73%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 65%Y80%) experienced at least moderate improvement. This improvement persisted for at least 1 month in 66% of patients (95% CI, 57%Y74%), with 18 patients (23%; 95% CI, 15%Y33%) clear for over 1 year. Minimal adverse effects were reported, and most patients (63%; 95% CI, 52%Y72%) stated that they would repeat GRT if available. Conclusions: Grenz ray therapy seems to be a safe and effective modality for chronic hand and foot dermatoses with some patients experiencing prolonged remissions. Grenz ray therapy, when available, should be considered before the use of systemic agents, which are often associated with higher costs and potential toxicities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)205-208
Number of pages4
JournalDermatitis
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Foot Dermatoses
Hand Dermatoses
X-Rays
Confidence Intervals
Therapeutics
Insurance Coverage
Certification
Radiation
Safety
Costs and Cost Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology
  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The effectiveness of grenz ray therapy for chronic dermatoses of the hands and feet. / Simpson, Brenda M.; Foster, Shannon K.; Chapman, Cindi N.; Simpson, Eric.

In: Dermatitis, Vol. 25, No. 4, 2014, p. 205-208.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Simpson, Brenda M. ; Foster, Shannon K. ; Chapman, Cindi N. ; Simpson, Eric. / The effectiveness of grenz ray therapy for chronic dermatoses of the hands and feet. In: Dermatitis. 2014 ; Vol. 25, No. 4. pp. 205-208.
@article{ad1c7995299844a5ad3c05df48e6c10b,
title = "The effectiveness of grenz ray therapy for chronic dermatoses of the hands and feet",
abstract = "Background: Grenz ray therapy (GRT) has been used for inflammatory and neoplastic dermatologic diseases for over 100 years. Its use is declining, possibly because of the difficulties maintaining radiation certification and insurance coverage. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of GRT in chronic inflammatory dermatoses of the hands and feet. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients treated with GRT at the Oregon Health & Science University from 2006 to 2009. Candidates identified for the study were then mailed questionnaires to supplement data acquired from chart review. Results: Most patients (73{\%}; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 65{\%}Y80{\%}) experienced at least moderate improvement. This improvement persisted for at least 1 month in 66{\%} of patients (95{\%} CI, 57{\%}Y74{\%}), with 18 patients (23{\%}; 95{\%} CI, 15{\%}Y33{\%}) clear for over 1 year. Minimal adverse effects were reported, and most patients (63{\%}; 95{\%} CI, 52{\%}Y72{\%}) stated that they would repeat GRT if available. Conclusions: Grenz ray therapy seems to be a safe and effective modality for chronic hand and foot dermatoses with some patients experiencing prolonged remissions. Grenz ray therapy, when available, should be considered before the use of systemic agents, which are often associated with higher costs and potential toxicities.",
author = "Simpson, {Brenda M.} and Foster, {Shannon K.} and Chapman, {Cindi N.} and Eric Simpson",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/DER.0000000000000050",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "205--208",
journal = "Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug",
issn = "1710-3568",
publisher = "Decker Publishing",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effectiveness of grenz ray therapy for chronic dermatoses of the hands and feet

AU - Simpson, Brenda M.

AU - Foster, Shannon K.

AU - Chapman, Cindi N.

AU - Simpson, Eric

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: Grenz ray therapy (GRT) has been used for inflammatory and neoplastic dermatologic diseases for over 100 years. Its use is declining, possibly because of the difficulties maintaining radiation certification and insurance coverage. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of GRT in chronic inflammatory dermatoses of the hands and feet. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients treated with GRT at the Oregon Health & Science University from 2006 to 2009. Candidates identified for the study were then mailed questionnaires to supplement data acquired from chart review. Results: Most patients (73%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 65%Y80%) experienced at least moderate improvement. This improvement persisted for at least 1 month in 66% of patients (95% CI, 57%Y74%), with 18 patients (23%; 95% CI, 15%Y33%) clear for over 1 year. Minimal adverse effects were reported, and most patients (63%; 95% CI, 52%Y72%) stated that they would repeat GRT if available. Conclusions: Grenz ray therapy seems to be a safe and effective modality for chronic hand and foot dermatoses with some patients experiencing prolonged remissions. Grenz ray therapy, when available, should be considered before the use of systemic agents, which are often associated with higher costs and potential toxicities.

AB - Background: Grenz ray therapy (GRT) has been used for inflammatory and neoplastic dermatologic diseases for over 100 years. Its use is declining, possibly because of the difficulties maintaining radiation certification and insurance coverage. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of GRT in chronic inflammatory dermatoses of the hands and feet. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients treated with GRT at the Oregon Health & Science University from 2006 to 2009. Candidates identified for the study were then mailed questionnaires to supplement data acquired from chart review. Results: Most patients (73%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 65%Y80%) experienced at least moderate improvement. This improvement persisted for at least 1 month in 66% of patients (95% CI, 57%Y74%), with 18 patients (23%; 95% CI, 15%Y33%) clear for over 1 year. Minimal adverse effects were reported, and most patients (63%; 95% CI, 52%Y72%) stated that they would repeat GRT if available. Conclusions: Grenz ray therapy seems to be a safe and effective modality for chronic hand and foot dermatoses with some patients experiencing prolonged remissions. Grenz ray therapy, when available, should be considered before the use of systemic agents, which are often associated with higher costs and potential toxicities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925884222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925884222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/DER.0000000000000050

DO - 10.1097/DER.0000000000000050

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 205

EP - 208

JO - Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug

JF - Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug

SN - 1710-3568

IS - 4

ER -