The Effect of Simple Interventions on Paramedic Aspirin Administration Rates

Jason B. Snider, Raymond Moreno, David J. Fuller, Terri Schmidt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To determine the baseline rate of aspirin administration by paramedics and to assess the effect of two interventions (protocol change and brief educational intervention) on that rate. Methods. The advanced life support transport provider's clinical database was retrospectively queried to identify calls involving adult patients with chest pain or paramedic impression of suspected cardiac event (possible acute coronary syndrome [ACS]). The study includes data from January 1, 1999, to June 30, 2002, which was divided into three distinct periods. Period 1 was the baseline, period 2 was after the protocol change intervention, and period 3 was after the brief educational intervention. The chest pain protocol indicates patients with chest pain should be treated with aspirin. Results. During period 1, 548 of 3,635 (15.1%) patients with possible ACS received aspirin. During period 2, 1,941 of 7,236 (26.8%) patients with possible ACS received aspirin (χ2 p <0.0001; odds ratio [OR] = 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.86-2.29). During period 3, 749 of 2,026 (37%) patients with possible ACS received aspirin (χ2 p <0.0001; OR = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.44-1.78). Comparing period 1 with period 3, after both interventions, there was a 22% absolute improvement in aspirin administration rates (χ2 p <0.0001; OR = 3.30; 95% CI = 2.91-3.76). Conclusion. Aspirin is underutilized in treating patients with suspected ACS. Two brief interventions can lead to modest increases in aspirin administration rates. Even after these interventions, aspirin administration rates remain low.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41-45
Number of pages5
JournalPrehospital Emergency Care
Volume8
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2004

Fingerprint

Allied Health Personnel
Aspirin
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Chest Pain
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Databases

Keywords

  • Acute coronary syndrome
  • Aspirin
  • Emergency medical services

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Snider, J. B., Moreno, R., Fuller, D. J., & Schmidt, T. (2004). The Effect of Simple Interventions on Paramedic Aspirin Administration Rates. Prehospital Emergency Care, 8(1), 41-45.

The Effect of Simple Interventions on Paramedic Aspirin Administration Rates. / Snider, Jason B.; Moreno, Raymond; Fuller, David J.; Schmidt, Terri.

In: Prehospital Emergency Care, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.2004, p. 41-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Snider, JB, Moreno, R, Fuller, DJ & Schmidt, T 2004, 'The Effect of Simple Interventions on Paramedic Aspirin Administration Rates', Prehospital Emergency Care, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 41-45.
Snider, Jason B. ; Moreno, Raymond ; Fuller, David J. ; Schmidt, Terri. / The Effect of Simple Interventions on Paramedic Aspirin Administration Rates. In: Prehospital Emergency Care. 2004 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 41-45.
@article{1043529a7a834f98ab19bb57dcd69e14,
title = "The Effect of Simple Interventions on Paramedic Aspirin Administration Rates",
abstract = "Objective. To determine the baseline rate of aspirin administration by paramedics and to assess the effect of two interventions (protocol change and brief educational intervention) on that rate. Methods. The advanced life support transport provider's clinical database was retrospectively queried to identify calls involving adult patients with chest pain or paramedic impression of suspected cardiac event (possible acute coronary syndrome [ACS]). The study includes data from January 1, 1999, to June 30, 2002, which was divided into three distinct periods. Period 1 was the baseline, period 2 was after the protocol change intervention, and period 3 was after the brief educational intervention. The chest pain protocol indicates patients with chest pain should be treated with aspirin. Results. During period 1, 548 of 3,635 (15.1{\%}) patients with possible ACS received aspirin. During period 2, 1,941 of 7,236 (26.8{\%}) patients with possible ACS received aspirin (χ2 p <0.0001; odds ratio [OR] = 2.06; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] = 1.86-2.29). During period 3, 749 of 2,026 (37{\%}) patients with possible ACS received aspirin (χ2 p <0.0001; OR = 1.60; 95{\%} CI = 1.44-1.78). Comparing period 1 with period 3, after both interventions, there was a 22{\%} absolute improvement in aspirin administration rates (χ2 p <0.0001; OR = 3.30; 95{\%} CI = 2.91-3.76). Conclusion. Aspirin is underutilized in treating patients with suspected ACS. Two brief interventions can lead to modest increases in aspirin administration rates. Even after these interventions, aspirin administration rates remain low.",
keywords = "Acute coronary syndrome, Aspirin, Emergency medical services",
author = "Snider, {Jason B.} and Raymond Moreno and Fuller, {David J.} and Terri Schmidt",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "41--45",
journal = "Prehospital Emergency Care",
issn = "1090-3127",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effect of Simple Interventions on Paramedic Aspirin Administration Rates

AU - Snider, Jason B.

AU - Moreno, Raymond

AU - Fuller, David J.

AU - Schmidt, Terri

PY - 2004/1

Y1 - 2004/1

N2 - Objective. To determine the baseline rate of aspirin administration by paramedics and to assess the effect of two interventions (protocol change and brief educational intervention) on that rate. Methods. The advanced life support transport provider's clinical database was retrospectively queried to identify calls involving adult patients with chest pain or paramedic impression of suspected cardiac event (possible acute coronary syndrome [ACS]). The study includes data from January 1, 1999, to June 30, 2002, which was divided into three distinct periods. Period 1 was the baseline, period 2 was after the protocol change intervention, and period 3 was after the brief educational intervention. The chest pain protocol indicates patients with chest pain should be treated with aspirin. Results. During period 1, 548 of 3,635 (15.1%) patients with possible ACS received aspirin. During period 2, 1,941 of 7,236 (26.8%) patients with possible ACS received aspirin (χ2 p <0.0001; odds ratio [OR] = 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.86-2.29). During period 3, 749 of 2,026 (37%) patients with possible ACS received aspirin (χ2 p <0.0001; OR = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.44-1.78). Comparing period 1 with period 3, after both interventions, there was a 22% absolute improvement in aspirin administration rates (χ2 p <0.0001; OR = 3.30; 95% CI = 2.91-3.76). Conclusion. Aspirin is underutilized in treating patients with suspected ACS. Two brief interventions can lead to modest increases in aspirin administration rates. Even after these interventions, aspirin administration rates remain low.

AB - Objective. To determine the baseline rate of aspirin administration by paramedics and to assess the effect of two interventions (protocol change and brief educational intervention) on that rate. Methods. The advanced life support transport provider's clinical database was retrospectively queried to identify calls involving adult patients with chest pain or paramedic impression of suspected cardiac event (possible acute coronary syndrome [ACS]). The study includes data from January 1, 1999, to June 30, 2002, which was divided into three distinct periods. Period 1 was the baseline, period 2 was after the protocol change intervention, and period 3 was after the brief educational intervention. The chest pain protocol indicates patients with chest pain should be treated with aspirin. Results. During period 1, 548 of 3,635 (15.1%) patients with possible ACS received aspirin. During period 2, 1,941 of 7,236 (26.8%) patients with possible ACS received aspirin (χ2 p <0.0001; odds ratio [OR] = 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.86-2.29). During period 3, 749 of 2,026 (37%) patients with possible ACS received aspirin (χ2 p <0.0001; OR = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.44-1.78). Comparing period 1 with period 3, after both interventions, there was a 22% absolute improvement in aspirin administration rates (χ2 p <0.0001; OR = 3.30; 95% CI = 2.91-3.76). Conclusion. Aspirin is underutilized in treating patients with suspected ACS. Two brief interventions can lead to modest increases in aspirin administration rates. Even after these interventions, aspirin administration rates remain low.

KW - Acute coronary syndrome

KW - Aspirin

KW - Emergency medical services

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346098201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0346098201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 41

EP - 45

JO - Prehospital Emergency Care

JF - Prehospital Emergency Care

SN - 1090-3127

IS - 1

ER -