The effect of menstrual cycle and contraceptives on ACL injuries and laxity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Simone D. Herzberg, Makalapua L. Motu’apuaka, William Lambert, Rongwei (Rochelle) Fu, Jacqueline Brady, Jeanne-Marie Guise

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Women are at substantially greater risk for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries than are men. Purpose: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to clarify the effect of the menstrual cycle and contraceptives on the laxity of and noncontact injuries to the ACL. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Searches were conducted using MEDLINE (1946–August 2016), the Cochrane Library Database, clinical trial registries, and related reference lists. Search terms included athletic injuries, knee injuries, ligaments, joint instability, menstrual cycle, ovulation, hormones, and contraceptives. Investigators independently dually abstracted and reviewed study details and quality using predefined criteria and evaluated overall strength of evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria. Results: Twenty-one studies totaling 68,758 participants were included: 5 on the menstrual cycle and ACL injury, 7 on hormonal contraceptives and ACL injury, as well as 13 on menstrual cycle and ligament laxity. Four of 5 studies of women not using hormonal contraception indicated that the luteal phase was the least associated with ACL injuries. The 2 largest and highest quality studies on hormonal contraceptives suggested that hormonal contraceptives may be protective against ACL injury. Six of 12 studies on ACL laxity provided quantitative data for meta-analysis, finding significantly increased laxity during the ovulatory phase compared with the follicular phase. Conclusion: The literature suggests an association between hormonal fluctuations and ACL injury. Recent studies have suggested that oral contraceptives may offer up to a 20% reduction in risk of injury. The literature on ACL injuries and the menstrual cycle has more than doubled over the past decade, permitting quantitative analysis for the first time. However, the overall strength of this evidence is low. Promising potential directions for future research include long-term observational studies with ongoing hormonal assays and large interventional trials of follicular suppression, including newer hormonal methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number2325967117718781
JournalOrthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume5
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Menstrual Cycle
Contraceptive Agents
Meta-Analysis
Ligaments
Joint Instability
Knee Injuries
Athletic Injuries
Follicular Phase
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Luteal Phase
Risk Reduction Behavior
Oral Contraceptives
Ovulation
Contraception
MEDLINE
Libraries
Observational Studies
Registries
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Anterior cruciate ligament
  • Female
  • Hormonal contraceptives
  • Human
  • Knee injury
  • Menstrual cycle
  • Meta-analysis
  • Sports medicine
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

The effect of menstrual cycle and contraceptives on ACL injuries and laxity : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. / Herzberg, Simone D.; Motu’apuaka, Makalapua L.; Lambert, William; Fu, Rongwei (Rochelle); Brady, Jacqueline; Guise, Jeanne-Marie.

In: Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 5, No. 7, 2325967117718781, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{e6f7522cf8d648dda2db3c127abd0e4d,
title = "The effect of menstrual cycle and contraceptives on ACL injuries and laxity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis",
abstract = "Background: Women are at substantially greater risk for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries than are men. Purpose: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to clarify the effect of the menstrual cycle and contraceptives on the laxity of and noncontact injuries to the ACL. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Searches were conducted using MEDLINE (1946–August 2016), the Cochrane Library Database, clinical trial registries, and related reference lists. Search terms included athletic injuries, knee injuries, ligaments, joint instability, menstrual cycle, ovulation, hormones, and contraceptives. Investigators independently dually abstracted and reviewed study details and quality using predefined criteria and evaluated overall strength of evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria. Results: Twenty-one studies totaling 68,758 participants were included: 5 on the menstrual cycle and ACL injury, 7 on hormonal contraceptives and ACL injury, as well as 13 on menstrual cycle and ligament laxity. Four of 5 studies of women not using hormonal contraception indicated that the luteal phase was the least associated with ACL injuries. The 2 largest and highest quality studies on hormonal contraceptives suggested that hormonal contraceptives may be protective against ACL injury. Six of 12 studies on ACL laxity provided quantitative data for meta-analysis, finding significantly increased laxity during the ovulatory phase compared with the follicular phase. Conclusion: The literature suggests an association between hormonal fluctuations and ACL injury. Recent studies have suggested that oral contraceptives may offer up to a 20{\%} reduction in risk of injury. The literature on ACL injuries and the menstrual cycle has more than doubled over the past decade, permitting quantitative analysis for the first time. However, the overall strength of this evidence is low. Promising potential directions for future research include long-term observational studies with ongoing hormonal assays and large interventional trials of follicular suppression, including newer hormonal methods.",
keywords = "Anterior cruciate ligament, Female, Hormonal contraceptives, Human, Knee injury, Menstrual cycle, Meta-analysis, Sports medicine, Systematic review",
author = "Herzberg, {Simone D.} and Motu’apuaka, {Makalapua L.} and William Lambert and Fu, {Rongwei (Rochelle)} and Jacqueline Brady and Jeanne-Marie Guise",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1177/2325967117718781",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "2325-9671",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of menstrual cycle and contraceptives on ACL injuries and laxity

T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

AU - Herzberg, Simone D.

AU - Motu’apuaka, Makalapua L.

AU - Lambert, William

AU - Fu, Rongwei (Rochelle)

AU - Brady, Jacqueline

AU - Guise, Jeanne-Marie

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Background: Women are at substantially greater risk for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries than are men. Purpose: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to clarify the effect of the menstrual cycle and contraceptives on the laxity of and noncontact injuries to the ACL. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Searches were conducted using MEDLINE (1946–August 2016), the Cochrane Library Database, clinical trial registries, and related reference lists. Search terms included athletic injuries, knee injuries, ligaments, joint instability, menstrual cycle, ovulation, hormones, and contraceptives. Investigators independently dually abstracted and reviewed study details and quality using predefined criteria and evaluated overall strength of evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria. Results: Twenty-one studies totaling 68,758 participants were included: 5 on the menstrual cycle and ACL injury, 7 on hormonal contraceptives and ACL injury, as well as 13 on menstrual cycle and ligament laxity. Four of 5 studies of women not using hormonal contraception indicated that the luteal phase was the least associated with ACL injuries. The 2 largest and highest quality studies on hormonal contraceptives suggested that hormonal contraceptives may be protective against ACL injury. Six of 12 studies on ACL laxity provided quantitative data for meta-analysis, finding significantly increased laxity during the ovulatory phase compared with the follicular phase. Conclusion: The literature suggests an association between hormonal fluctuations and ACL injury. Recent studies have suggested that oral contraceptives may offer up to a 20% reduction in risk of injury. The literature on ACL injuries and the menstrual cycle has more than doubled over the past decade, permitting quantitative analysis for the first time. However, the overall strength of this evidence is low. Promising potential directions for future research include long-term observational studies with ongoing hormonal assays and large interventional trials of follicular suppression, including newer hormonal methods.

AB - Background: Women are at substantially greater risk for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries than are men. Purpose: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to clarify the effect of the menstrual cycle and contraceptives on the laxity of and noncontact injuries to the ACL. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Searches were conducted using MEDLINE (1946–August 2016), the Cochrane Library Database, clinical trial registries, and related reference lists. Search terms included athletic injuries, knee injuries, ligaments, joint instability, menstrual cycle, ovulation, hormones, and contraceptives. Investigators independently dually abstracted and reviewed study details and quality using predefined criteria and evaluated overall strength of evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria. Results: Twenty-one studies totaling 68,758 participants were included: 5 on the menstrual cycle and ACL injury, 7 on hormonal contraceptives and ACL injury, as well as 13 on menstrual cycle and ligament laxity. Four of 5 studies of women not using hormonal contraception indicated that the luteal phase was the least associated with ACL injuries. The 2 largest and highest quality studies on hormonal contraceptives suggested that hormonal contraceptives may be protective against ACL injury. Six of 12 studies on ACL laxity provided quantitative data for meta-analysis, finding significantly increased laxity during the ovulatory phase compared with the follicular phase. Conclusion: The literature suggests an association between hormonal fluctuations and ACL injury. Recent studies have suggested that oral contraceptives may offer up to a 20% reduction in risk of injury. The literature on ACL injuries and the menstrual cycle has more than doubled over the past decade, permitting quantitative analysis for the first time. However, the overall strength of this evidence is low. Promising potential directions for future research include long-term observational studies with ongoing hormonal assays and large interventional trials of follicular suppression, including newer hormonal methods.

KW - Anterior cruciate ligament

KW - Female

KW - Hormonal contraceptives

KW - Human

KW - Knee injury

KW - Menstrual cycle

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Sports medicine

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026785936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026785936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2325967117718781

DO - 10.1177/2325967117718781

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85026785936

VL - 5

JO - Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 2325-9671

IS - 7

M1 - 2325967117718781

ER -