TY - JOUR
T1 - The Effect of Auditory Cues on Static Postural Control
T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
AU - Zarei, Hamed
AU - Norasteh, Ali Asghar
AU - King, Laurie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel.
PY - 2022/11/1
Y1 - 2022/11/1
N2 - Introduction: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize the results related to the effects of auditory cues on static postural control. Methods: MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, LILACS, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science, PEDro, and Google Scholar were searched from inception until September 2020. Risk of bias was evaluated by both reviewers using Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). Results: Twelve studies with 403 participants were included in the review and 9 studies with 305 participants in the meta-analysis. Results show that auditory cues have significant effects on postural sway in the anterior-posterior direction (p = 0.001), postural sway in the medial-lateral direction (p = 0.001), and static balance (p = 0.001). A low to high heterogeneity was observed across all comparisons. Conclusions: Results of this meta-analysis revealed that auditory cues decrease postural sway in the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral direction; it also improves static balance. Thus, it can be concluded that auditory cues improve static postural control. Our results suggest that the auditory system can be a determinant of static postural control along with other sensory systems including visual, vestibular, and proprioception systems. Also, this study implies that auditory cues can be a significant therapeutic approach to improve static postural control.
AB - Introduction: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize the results related to the effects of auditory cues on static postural control. Methods: MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, LILACS, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science, PEDro, and Google Scholar were searched from inception until September 2020. Risk of bias was evaluated by both reviewers using Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). Results: Twelve studies with 403 participants were included in the review and 9 studies with 305 participants in the meta-analysis. Results show that auditory cues have significant effects on postural sway in the anterior-posterior direction (p = 0.001), postural sway in the medial-lateral direction (p = 0.001), and static balance (p = 0.001). A low to high heterogeneity was observed across all comparisons. Conclusions: Results of this meta-analysis revealed that auditory cues decrease postural sway in the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral direction; it also improves static balance. Thus, it can be concluded that auditory cues improve static postural control. Our results suggest that the auditory system can be a determinant of static postural control along with other sensory systems including visual, vestibular, and proprioception systems. Also, this study implies that auditory cues can be a significant therapeutic approach to improve static postural control.
KW - Auditory cues
KW - Balance
KW - Hearing acuity
KW - Postural control
KW - Sensory systems
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140247970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85140247970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1159/000525951
DO - 10.1159/000525951
M3 - Review article
C2 - 36096117
AN - SCOPUS:85140247970
SN - 1420-3030
VL - 27
SP - 427
EP - 436
JO - Audiology and Neurotology
JF - Audiology and Neurotology
IS - 6
ER -