TY - JOUR
T1 - The disclosure of incidental genomic findings
T2 - An "ethically important moment" in pediatric research and practice
AU - Driessnack, Martha
AU - Daack-Hirsch, Sandra
AU - Downing, Nancy
AU - Hanish, Alyson
AU - Shah, Lisa L.
AU - Alasagheirin, Mohammed
AU - Simon, Christian M.
AU - Williams, Janet K.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments The study was supported by an (ARRA) grant from the National Human Genome Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (RC1HG005786). The authors acknowledge the entire research team, the American College of Medical Genetics, the National Society of Genetic Counselors, the International Society of Nurses in Genetics, and the Heartland Regional Genetics & Newborn Screening Collaborative for their assistance in recruitment, and the University of Northern Iowa Center for Social and Behavioral Research for collaboration on interview guide development and data collection.
PY - 2013/10
Y1 - 2013/10
N2 - Although there are numerous position papers on the issues and challenges surrounding disclosure of incidental genomic findings involving children, there is very little research. To fill this gap, the purpose of this study was to explore the perspectives of multiple professional (N=103) and public (N=63) stakeholders using both interviews and focus groups. Using qualitative analysis, we identified one overarching theme, "It's hard for us; it's hard for them," and three subthemes/questions: "What to disclose?," "Who gets the information?," and "What happens later?" Perspectives differed between professional (Institutional Review Board chairs, clinicians, and researchers) and public stakeholders. While professionals focused on the complexities of what to disclose, the lay public stated that parents should have all information laid out for them. Professionals pondered multiple parent and child situations, while the public identified parents as informational gatekeepers who know their children best. Professionals described the potential requirement for follow-up over time as a logistical "nightmare," while the public believed that parents have the responsibility for managing their children's health information over time. However, the parent role as gatekeeper was seen as time limited and in need of professional support and backup. Our findings present a case for needed dialogue around what we propose as an "ethically important moment," with the goal of protecting and respecting the viewpoints of all stakeholders when policies regarding children are developed.
AB - Although there are numerous position papers on the issues and challenges surrounding disclosure of incidental genomic findings involving children, there is very little research. To fill this gap, the purpose of this study was to explore the perspectives of multiple professional (N=103) and public (N=63) stakeholders using both interviews and focus groups. Using qualitative analysis, we identified one overarching theme, "It's hard for us; it's hard for them," and three subthemes/questions: "What to disclose?," "Who gets the information?," and "What happens later?" Perspectives differed between professional (Institutional Review Board chairs, clinicians, and researchers) and public stakeholders. While professionals focused on the complexities of what to disclose, the lay public stated that parents should have all information laid out for them. Professionals pondered multiple parent and child situations, while the public identified parents as informational gatekeepers who know their children best. Professionals described the potential requirement for follow-up over time as a logistical "nightmare," while the public believed that parents have the responsibility for managing their children's health information over time. However, the parent role as gatekeeper was seen as time limited and in need of professional support and backup. Our findings present a case for needed dialogue around what we propose as an "ethically important moment," with the goal of protecting and respecting the viewpoints of all stakeholders when policies regarding children are developed.
KW - Children
KW - Gatekeepers
KW - Genomics
KW - Incidental findings
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881454881&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881454881&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12687-013-0145-1
DO - 10.1007/s12687-013-0145-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84881454881
SN - 1868-310X
VL - 4
SP - 435
EP - 444
JO - Journal of Community Genetics
JF - Journal of Community Genetics
IS - 4
ER -