The Cost-Effectiveness of Professional Doula Care for a Woman's First Two Births: A Decision Analysis Model

Karen S. Greiner, Alyssa R. Hersh, Sally R. Hersh, Jesse M. Remer, Alexandra C. Gallagher, Aaron Caughey, Ellen Tilden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Multiple studies have demonstrated the benefits of intrapartum doula care, including lower risk for cesarean birth and shortened labor time for nulliparous women. However, analyses investigating the cost-effectiveness of doula care are limited. This study evaluated the potential cost-effectiveness of professional doula support during a woman's first birth in a theoretical population of US women, with all women having a second birth without doula care. Methods: A cost-effectiveness model was designed to compare outcomes in women with a professional doula versus no doula labor support. A theoretical cohort of 1.6 million women, the approximate number of annual low-risk, nulliparous, term, singleton births in the United States, was used. Outcomes included mode of birth, maternal death, uterine rupture, cesarean hysterectomy, costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Probability estimates used in the model were derived from the literature, and a cost-effectiveness threshold was set at $100,000 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses were used to investigate the robustness of the results. Results: In this theoretical model, professional doula care during the first birth resulted in fewer cesarean births and improved QALYs. Additionally, doula support resulted in 202,538 fewer cesarean births, 46 fewer maternal deaths secondary to fewer cesarean births, 99 fewer uterine ruptures, and 26 fewer hysterectomies, with an additional cost of $185 million and 7617 increased QALYs for the first and subsequent births. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated a professional doula was potentially cost-saving up to $884 and cost-effective up to $1360 per doula. Discussion: Professional doula care during a woman's first birth may lead to improved outcomes and increased QALYs during her first and second births. Given the limitations of this analysis, the cost-effectiveness estimate is likely conservative, further supporting broader integration of professional doulas into the US maternity care system and highlighting the need for higher doula care reimbursement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Midwifery and Women's Health
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Doulas
Birth Order
Decision Support Techniques
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Parturition
Uterine Rupture
Costs and Cost Analysis
Maternal Death
Hysterectomy
Term Birth

Keywords

  • cost-effectiveness analysis
  • labor
  • labor care
  • low-risk
  • maternity care
  • professional doula
  • term birth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Maternity and Midwifery

Cite this

The Cost-Effectiveness of Professional Doula Care for a Woman's First Two Births : A Decision Analysis Model. / Greiner, Karen S.; Hersh, Alyssa R.; Hersh, Sally R.; Remer, Jesse M.; Gallagher, Alexandra C.; Caughey, Aaron; Tilden, Ellen.

In: Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{256f26c3ef494a2798349bc571dc1ac1,
title = "The Cost-Effectiveness of Professional Doula Care for a Woman's First Two Births: A Decision Analysis Model",
abstract = "Introduction: Multiple studies have demonstrated the benefits of intrapartum doula care, including lower risk for cesarean birth and shortened labor time for nulliparous women. However, analyses investigating the cost-effectiveness of doula care are limited. This study evaluated the potential cost-effectiveness of professional doula support during a woman's first birth in a theoretical population of US women, with all women having a second birth without doula care. Methods: A cost-effectiveness model was designed to compare outcomes in women with a professional doula versus no doula labor support. A theoretical cohort of 1.6 million women, the approximate number of annual low-risk, nulliparous, term, singleton births in the United States, was used. Outcomes included mode of birth, maternal death, uterine rupture, cesarean hysterectomy, costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Probability estimates used in the model were derived from the literature, and a cost-effectiveness threshold was set at $100,000 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses were used to investigate the robustness of the results. Results: In this theoretical model, professional doula care during the first birth resulted in fewer cesarean births and improved QALYs. Additionally, doula support resulted in 202,538 fewer cesarean births, 46 fewer maternal deaths secondary to fewer cesarean births, 99 fewer uterine ruptures, and 26 fewer hysterectomies, with an additional cost of $185 million and 7617 increased QALYs for the first and subsequent births. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated a professional doula was potentially cost-saving up to $884 and cost-effective up to $1360 per doula. Discussion: Professional doula care during a woman's first birth may lead to improved outcomes and increased QALYs during her first and second births. Given the limitations of this analysis, the cost-effectiveness estimate is likely conservative, further supporting broader integration of professional doulas into the US maternity care system and highlighting the need for higher doula care reimbursement.",
keywords = "cost-effectiveness analysis, labor, labor care, low-risk, maternity care, professional doula, term birth",
author = "Greiner, {Karen S.} and Hersh, {Alyssa R.} and Hersh, {Sally R.} and Remer, {Jesse M.} and Gallagher, {Alexandra C.} and Aaron Caughey and Ellen Tilden",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jmwh.12972",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health",
issn = "1526-9523",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Cost-Effectiveness of Professional Doula Care for a Woman's First Two Births

T2 - A Decision Analysis Model

AU - Greiner, Karen S.

AU - Hersh, Alyssa R.

AU - Hersh, Sally R.

AU - Remer, Jesse M.

AU - Gallagher, Alexandra C.

AU - Caughey, Aaron

AU - Tilden, Ellen

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Introduction: Multiple studies have demonstrated the benefits of intrapartum doula care, including lower risk for cesarean birth and shortened labor time for nulliparous women. However, analyses investigating the cost-effectiveness of doula care are limited. This study evaluated the potential cost-effectiveness of professional doula support during a woman's first birth in a theoretical population of US women, with all women having a second birth without doula care. Methods: A cost-effectiveness model was designed to compare outcomes in women with a professional doula versus no doula labor support. A theoretical cohort of 1.6 million women, the approximate number of annual low-risk, nulliparous, term, singleton births in the United States, was used. Outcomes included mode of birth, maternal death, uterine rupture, cesarean hysterectomy, costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Probability estimates used in the model were derived from the literature, and a cost-effectiveness threshold was set at $100,000 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses were used to investigate the robustness of the results. Results: In this theoretical model, professional doula care during the first birth resulted in fewer cesarean births and improved QALYs. Additionally, doula support resulted in 202,538 fewer cesarean births, 46 fewer maternal deaths secondary to fewer cesarean births, 99 fewer uterine ruptures, and 26 fewer hysterectomies, with an additional cost of $185 million and 7617 increased QALYs for the first and subsequent births. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated a professional doula was potentially cost-saving up to $884 and cost-effective up to $1360 per doula. Discussion: Professional doula care during a woman's first birth may lead to improved outcomes and increased QALYs during her first and second births. Given the limitations of this analysis, the cost-effectiveness estimate is likely conservative, further supporting broader integration of professional doulas into the US maternity care system and highlighting the need for higher doula care reimbursement.

AB - Introduction: Multiple studies have demonstrated the benefits of intrapartum doula care, including lower risk for cesarean birth and shortened labor time for nulliparous women. However, analyses investigating the cost-effectiveness of doula care are limited. This study evaluated the potential cost-effectiveness of professional doula support during a woman's first birth in a theoretical population of US women, with all women having a second birth without doula care. Methods: A cost-effectiveness model was designed to compare outcomes in women with a professional doula versus no doula labor support. A theoretical cohort of 1.6 million women, the approximate number of annual low-risk, nulliparous, term, singleton births in the United States, was used. Outcomes included mode of birth, maternal death, uterine rupture, cesarean hysterectomy, costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Probability estimates used in the model were derived from the literature, and a cost-effectiveness threshold was set at $100,000 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses were used to investigate the robustness of the results. Results: In this theoretical model, professional doula care during the first birth resulted in fewer cesarean births and improved QALYs. Additionally, doula support resulted in 202,538 fewer cesarean births, 46 fewer maternal deaths secondary to fewer cesarean births, 99 fewer uterine ruptures, and 26 fewer hysterectomies, with an additional cost of $185 million and 7617 increased QALYs for the first and subsequent births. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated a professional doula was potentially cost-saving up to $884 and cost-effective up to $1360 per doula. Discussion: Professional doula care during a woman's first birth may lead to improved outcomes and increased QALYs during her first and second births. Given the limitations of this analysis, the cost-effectiveness estimate is likely conservative, further supporting broader integration of professional doulas into the US maternity care system and highlighting the need for higher doula care reimbursement.

KW - cost-effectiveness analysis

KW - labor

KW - labor care

KW - low-risk

KW - maternity care

KW - professional doula

KW - term birth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065184780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065184780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jmwh.12972

DO - 10.1111/jmwh.12972

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85065184780

JO - Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health

JF - Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health

SN - 1526-9523

ER -