The contribution of cochlear implants to postural stability

Corey S. Shayman, Martina Mancini, Tyler S. Weaver, Laurie King, Timothy Hullar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether spatial auditory cues provided by cochlear implants can improve postural balance in adults with severe deafness. Methods: In the presence of spatial white noise, 13 adult cochlear implantees wore head and lumbar-mounted inertial sensors while standing in the dark for 30 seconds in two auditory conditions: hearing assistive devices on and off. Results: Stability was improved with implants on (aided condition) compared to off (unaided condition) with respect to differences in mean head velocity (Cohen's d = 0.912, P = 0.006) as well as to root mean square (RMS) acceleration (Cohen's d = 0.456, P = 0.048). This was particularly evident in measures of anteroposterior accelerations (mean difference = 0.034 m/s2; Cohen's d = 0.612; P = 0.011). Conclusion: The decrease in RMS head acceleration and velocity while wearing cochlear implants suggests that they could be recognized as balance implants in addition to auditory implants. The clinical importance of this finding in various patient populations remains to be determined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalLaryngoscope
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Cochlear Implants
Head
Postural Balance
Self-Help Devices
Cochlea
Deafness
Hearing
Cues
Population

Keywords

  • Audition
  • Balance
  • Cochlear implant
  • Fall
  • Inertial sensor
  • Posture
  • Sensory weighting
  • Stability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

The contribution of cochlear implants to postural stability. / Shayman, Corey S.; Mancini, Martina; Weaver, Tyler S.; King, Laurie; Hullar, Timothy.

In: Laryngoscope, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1b9fc793b4b745cd967b484dca15103c,
title = "The contribution of cochlear implants to postural stability",
abstract = "Objectives: To determine whether spatial auditory cues provided by cochlear implants can improve postural balance in adults with severe deafness. Methods: In the presence of spatial white noise, 13 adult cochlear implantees wore head and lumbar-mounted inertial sensors while standing in the dark for 30 seconds in two auditory conditions: hearing assistive devices on and off. Results: Stability was improved with implants on (aided condition) compared to off (unaided condition) with respect to differences in mean head velocity (Cohen's d = 0.912, P = 0.006) as well as to root mean square (RMS) acceleration (Cohen's d = 0.456, P = 0.048). This was particularly evident in measures of anteroposterior accelerations (mean difference = 0.034 m/s2; Cohen's d = 0.612; P = 0.011). Conclusion: The decrease in RMS head acceleration and velocity while wearing cochlear implants suggests that they could be recognized as balance implants in addition to auditory implants. The clinical importance of this finding in various patient populations remains to be determined.",
keywords = "Audition, Balance, Cochlear implant, Fall, Inertial sensor, Posture, Sensory weighting, Stability",
author = "Shayman, {Corey S.} and Martina Mancini and Weaver, {Tyler S.} and Laurie King and Timothy Hullar",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1002/lary.26994",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The contribution of cochlear implants to postural stability

AU - Shayman, Corey S.

AU - Mancini, Martina

AU - Weaver, Tyler S.

AU - King, Laurie

AU - Hullar, Timothy

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Objectives: To determine whether spatial auditory cues provided by cochlear implants can improve postural balance in adults with severe deafness. Methods: In the presence of spatial white noise, 13 adult cochlear implantees wore head and lumbar-mounted inertial sensors while standing in the dark for 30 seconds in two auditory conditions: hearing assistive devices on and off. Results: Stability was improved with implants on (aided condition) compared to off (unaided condition) with respect to differences in mean head velocity (Cohen's d = 0.912, P = 0.006) as well as to root mean square (RMS) acceleration (Cohen's d = 0.456, P = 0.048). This was particularly evident in measures of anteroposterior accelerations (mean difference = 0.034 m/s2; Cohen's d = 0.612; P = 0.011). Conclusion: The decrease in RMS head acceleration and velocity while wearing cochlear implants suggests that they could be recognized as balance implants in addition to auditory implants. The clinical importance of this finding in various patient populations remains to be determined.

AB - Objectives: To determine whether spatial auditory cues provided by cochlear implants can improve postural balance in adults with severe deafness. Methods: In the presence of spatial white noise, 13 adult cochlear implantees wore head and lumbar-mounted inertial sensors while standing in the dark for 30 seconds in two auditory conditions: hearing assistive devices on and off. Results: Stability was improved with implants on (aided condition) compared to off (unaided condition) with respect to differences in mean head velocity (Cohen's d = 0.912, P = 0.006) as well as to root mean square (RMS) acceleration (Cohen's d = 0.456, P = 0.048). This was particularly evident in measures of anteroposterior accelerations (mean difference = 0.034 m/s2; Cohen's d = 0.612; P = 0.011). Conclusion: The decrease in RMS head acceleration and velocity while wearing cochlear implants suggests that they could be recognized as balance implants in addition to auditory implants. The clinical importance of this finding in various patient populations remains to be determined.

KW - Audition

KW - Balance

KW - Cochlear implant

KW - Fall

KW - Inertial sensor

KW - Posture

KW - Sensory weighting

KW - Stability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033222935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033222935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.26994

DO - 10.1002/lary.26994

M3 - Article

C2 - 29114889

AN - SCOPUS:85033222935

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

ER -