The Coevolution of Bioethics and the Medical Humanities with Palliative Medicine, 1967-1997

David Barnard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Department of Humanities that I chair at the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine was the first such department ever established at any medical school. It opened supplement 1967. In that same year, St. Christopher's, the first modern hospice, opened in London. Merely a coincidence? I do not think so. The forces that propelled bioethics and the humanities into medical education were the same forces that called the modern hospice movement into being. Over the past three decades, both movements have evolved together, nourishing each other and challenging each other. This essay will sketch three phases in the coevolution of bioethics and the medical humanities on the one hand, and hospice and palliative medicine on the other. The first phase I will call the common matrix of concern. The second phase I will call the elaboration of the concept and practice of “whole person care.” The third phase I will call the era of public policy and corporate medicine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)187-193
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Palliative Medicine
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bioethics
Hospices
Medicine
Public Policy
Medical Education
Medical Schools
Palliative Medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Medicine(all)
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

The Coevolution of Bioethics and the Medical Humanities with Palliative Medicine, 1967-1997. / Barnard, David.

In: Journal of Palliative Medicine, Vol. 1, No. 2, 01.06.1998, p. 187-193.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1bec5f11d2ea44a7ba5111949c40ec45,
title = "The Coevolution of Bioethics and the Medical Humanities with Palliative Medicine, 1967-1997",
abstract = "The Department of Humanities that I chair at the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine was the first such department ever established at any medical school. It opened supplement 1967. In that same year, St. Christopher's, the first modern hospice, opened in London. Merely a coincidence? I do not think so. The forces that propelled bioethics and the humanities into medical education were the same forces that called the modern hospice movement into being. Over the past three decades, both movements have evolved together, nourishing each other and challenging each other. This essay will sketch three phases in the coevolution of bioethics and the medical humanities on the one hand, and hospice and palliative medicine on the other. The first phase I will call the common matrix of concern. The second phase I will call the elaboration of the concept and practice of “whole person care.” The third phase I will call the era of public policy and corporate medicine.",
author = "David Barnard",
year = "1998",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/jpm.1998.1.187",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "187--193",
journal = "Journal of Palliative Medicine",
issn = "1096-6218",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Coevolution of Bioethics and the Medical Humanities with Palliative Medicine, 1967-1997

AU - Barnard, David

PY - 1998/6/1

Y1 - 1998/6/1

N2 - The Department of Humanities that I chair at the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine was the first such department ever established at any medical school. It opened supplement 1967. In that same year, St. Christopher's, the first modern hospice, opened in London. Merely a coincidence? I do not think so. The forces that propelled bioethics and the humanities into medical education were the same forces that called the modern hospice movement into being. Over the past three decades, both movements have evolved together, nourishing each other and challenging each other. This essay will sketch three phases in the coevolution of bioethics and the medical humanities on the one hand, and hospice and palliative medicine on the other. The first phase I will call the common matrix of concern. The second phase I will call the elaboration of the concept and practice of “whole person care.” The third phase I will call the era of public policy and corporate medicine.

AB - The Department of Humanities that I chair at the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine was the first such department ever established at any medical school. It opened supplement 1967. In that same year, St. Christopher's, the first modern hospice, opened in London. Merely a coincidence? I do not think so. The forces that propelled bioethics and the humanities into medical education were the same forces that called the modern hospice movement into being. Over the past three decades, both movements have evolved together, nourishing each other and challenging each other. This essay will sketch three phases in the coevolution of bioethics and the medical humanities on the one hand, and hospice and palliative medicine on the other. The first phase I will call the common matrix of concern. The second phase I will call the elaboration of the concept and practice of “whole person care.” The third phase I will call the era of public policy and corporate medicine.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84993134743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84993134743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/jpm.1998.1.187

DO - 10.1089/jpm.1998.1.187

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84993134743

VL - 1

SP - 187

EP - 193

JO - Journal of Palliative Medicine

JF - Journal of Palliative Medicine

SN - 1096-6218

IS - 2

ER -