The Care Transitions Innovation (C-TraIn) for Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Adults: Results of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Honora Englander, Leann Michaels, Benjamin Chan, Devan Kansagara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Despite growing emphasis on transitional care to reduce costs and improve quality, few studies have examined transitional care improvements in socioeconomically disadvantaged adults. It is important to consider these patients separately as many are high-utilizers, have different needs, and may have different responses to interventions.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of a multicomponent transitional care improvement program on 30-day readmissions, emergency department (ED) use, transitional care quality, and mortality.

Design: Clustered randomized controlled trial conducted at a single urban academic medical center in Portland, Oregon.

Participants: Three hundred eighty-two hospitalized low-income adults admitted to general medicine or cardiology who were uninsured or had public insurance.

Measurements: Primary outcomes included 30-day inpatient readmission and ED use. Readmission data were obtained using state-wide administrative data for all participants (insured and uninsured). Secondary outcomes included quality (3-item Care Transitions Measure) and mortality. Research staff administering questionnaires and assessing outcomes were blinded.

Intervention: Multicomponent intervention including (1) transitional nurse coaching and education, including home visits for highest risk patients; (2) pharmacy care, including provision of 30 days of medications after discharge for those without prescription drug coverage; (3) post-hospital primary care linkages; (4) systems integration and continuous quality improvement.

Results: There was no significant difference in 30-day readmission between C-TraIn (30/209, 14.4 %) and control patients (27/173, 16.1 %), p = 0.644, or in ED visits between C-TraIn (51/209, 24.4 %) and control (33/173, 19.6 %), p = 0.271. C-TraIn was associated with improved transitional care quality; 47.3 % (71/150) of C-TraIn patients reported a high quality transition compared to 30.3 % (36/119) control patients, odds ratio 2.17 (95 % CI 1.30–3.64). Zero C-TraIn patients died in the 30-day post-discharge period compared with five in the control group (unadjusted p = 0.02).

Conclusions: C-TraIn did not reduce 30-day inpatient readmissions or ED use; however, it improved transitional care quality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1460-1467
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume29
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Patient Transfer
Vulnerable Populations
Randomized Controlled Trials
Hospital Emergency Service
Inpatients
Systems Integration
House Calls
Prescription Drugs
Mortality
Quality Improvement
Insurance
Cardiology
Transitional Care
Primary Health Care
Odds Ratio
Nurses
Medicine
Education
Costs and Cost Analysis
Control Groups

Keywords

  • care transitions
  • health care reform
  • patient readmission
  • underserved populations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The Care Transitions Innovation (C-TraIn) for Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Adults : Results of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. / Englander, Honora; Michaels, Leann; Chan, Benjamin; Kansagara, Devan.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 29, No. 11, 2014, p. 1460-1467.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{df0339fe0b344a0d9db136001762f6df,
title = "The Care Transitions Innovation (C-TraIn) for Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Adults: Results of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial",
abstract = "Background: Despite growing emphasis on transitional care to reduce costs and improve quality, few studies have examined transitional care improvements in socioeconomically disadvantaged adults. It is important to consider these patients separately as many are high-utilizers, have different needs, and may have different responses to interventions.Objective: To evaluate the impact of a multicomponent transitional care improvement program on 30-day readmissions, emergency department (ED) use, transitional care quality, and mortality.Design: Clustered randomized controlled trial conducted at a single urban academic medical center in Portland, Oregon.Participants: Three hundred eighty-two hospitalized low-income adults admitted to general medicine or cardiology who were uninsured or had public insurance.Measurements: Primary outcomes included 30-day inpatient readmission and ED use. Readmission data were obtained using state-wide administrative data for all participants (insured and uninsured). Secondary outcomes included quality (3-item Care Transitions Measure) and mortality. Research staff administering questionnaires and assessing outcomes were blinded.Intervention: Multicomponent intervention including (1) transitional nurse coaching and education, including home visits for highest risk patients; (2) pharmacy care, including provision of 30 days of medications after discharge for those without prescription drug coverage; (3) post-hospital primary care linkages; (4) systems integration and continuous quality improvement.Results: There was no significant difference in 30-day readmission between C-TraIn (30/209, 14.4 {\%}) and control patients (27/173, 16.1 {\%}), p = 0.644, or in ED visits between C-TraIn (51/209, 24.4 {\%}) and control (33/173, 19.6 {\%}), p = 0.271. C-TraIn was associated with improved transitional care quality; 47.3 {\%} (71/150) of C-TraIn patients reported a high quality transition compared to 30.3 {\%} (36/119) control patients, odds ratio 2.17 (95 {\%} CI 1.30–3.64). Zero C-TraIn patients died in the 30-day post-discharge period compared with five in the control group (unadjusted p = 0.02).Conclusions: C-TraIn did not reduce 30-day inpatient readmissions or ED use; however, it improved transitional care quality.",
keywords = "care transitions, health care reform, patient readmission, underserved populations",
author = "Honora Englander and Leann Michaels and Benjamin Chan and Devan Kansagara",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-014-2903-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "1460--1467",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Care Transitions Innovation (C-TraIn) for Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Adults

T2 - Results of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

AU - Englander, Honora

AU - Michaels, Leann

AU - Chan, Benjamin

AU - Kansagara, Devan

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: Despite growing emphasis on transitional care to reduce costs and improve quality, few studies have examined transitional care improvements in socioeconomically disadvantaged adults. It is important to consider these patients separately as many are high-utilizers, have different needs, and may have different responses to interventions.Objective: To evaluate the impact of a multicomponent transitional care improvement program on 30-day readmissions, emergency department (ED) use, transitional care quality, and mortality.Design: Clustered randomized controlled trial conducted at a single urban academic medical center in Portland, Oregon.Participants: Three hundred eighty-two hospitalized low-income adults admitted to general medicine or cardiology who were uninsured or had public insurance.Measurements: Primary outcomes included 30-day inpatient readmission and ED use. Readmission data were obtained using state-wide administrative data for all participants (insured and uninsured). Secondary outcomes included quality (3-item Care Transitions Measure) and mortality. Research staff administering questionnaires and assessing outcomes were blinded.Intervention: Multicomponent intervention including (1) transitional nurse coaching and education, including home visits for highest risk patients; (2) pharmacy care, including provision of 30 days of medications after discharge for those without prescription drug coverage; (3) post-hospital primary care linkages; (4) systems integration and continuous quality improvement.Results: There was no significant difference in 30-day readmission between C-TraIn (30/209, 14.4 %) and control patients (27/173, 16.1 %), p = 0.644, or in ED visits between C-TraIn (51/209, 24.4 %) and control (33/173, 19.6 %), p = 0.271. C-TraIn was associated with improved transitional care quality; 47.3 % (71/150) of C-TraIn patients reported a high quality transition compared to 30.3 % (36/119) control patients, odds ratio 2.17 (95 % CI 1.30–3.64). Zero C-TraIn patients died in the 30-day post-discharge period compared with five in the control group (unadjusted p = 0.02).Conclusions: C-TraIn did not reduce 30-day inpatient readmissions or ED use; however, it improved transitional care quality.

AB - Background: Despite growing emphasis on transitional care to reduce costs and improve quality, few studies have examined transitional care improvements in socioeconomically disadvantaged adults. It is important to consider these patients separately as many are high-utilizers, have different needs, and may have different responses to interventions.Objective: To evaluate the impact of a multicomponent transitional care improvement program on 30-day readmissions, emergency department (ED) use, transitional care quality, and mortality.Design: Clustered randomized controlled trial conducted at a single urban academic medical center in Portland, Oregon.Participants: Three hundred eighty-two hospitalized low-income adults admitted to general medicine or cardiology who were uninsured or had public insurance.Measurements: Primary outcomes included 30-day inpatient readmission and ED use. Readmission data were obtained using state-wide administrative data for all participants (insured and uninsured). Secondary outcomes included quality (3-item Care Transitions Measure) and mortality. Research staff administering questionnaires and assessing outcomes were blinded.Intervention: Multicomponent intervention including (1) transitional nurse coaching and education, including home visits for highest risk patients; (2) pharmacy care, including provision of 30 days of medications after discharge for those without prescription drug coverage; (3) post-hospital primary care linkages; (4) systems integration and continuous quality improvement.Results: There was no significant difference in 30-day readmission between C-TraIn (30/209, 14.4 %) and control patients (27/173, 16.1 %), p = 0.644, or in ED visits between C-TraIn (51/209, 24.4 %) and control (33/173, 19.6 %), p = 0.271. C-TraIn was associated with improved transitional care quality; 47.3 % (71/150) of C-TraIn patients reported a high quality transition compared to 30.3 % (36/119) control patients, odds ratio 2.17 (95 % CI 1.30–3.64). Zero C-TraIn patients died in the 30-day post-discharge period compared with five in the control group (unadjusted p = 0.02).Conclusions: C-TraIn did not reduce 30-day inpatient readmissions or ED use; however, it improved transitional care quality.

KW - care transitions

KW - health care reform

KW - patient readmission

KW - underserved populations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930885243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930885243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-014-2903-0

DO - 10.1007/s11606-014-2903-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 24913003

AN - SCOPUS:84930885243

VL - 29

SP - 1460

EP - 1467

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 11

ER -