The back pain outcome assessment team: Background and progress

John D. Loeser, Richard (Rick) Deyo, Daniel C. Cherkin, Douglas Conrad, John Wiesman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the federal initiative in outcomes research, the organization and structor of a Patient Outcomes Research Team [PORT] concerned with low back pain, and the early progress of this research team. Findings: Back pain is a leading reason for physician visits, hospitalization, and work disability. However, there is a paucity of valid evidence to support most current methods of treating spine disorders. This PORT was funded to study geographic variation in the use of back surgery and to better characterize its outcomes; evaluate the reasons for nonsurgical hospitalization for back pain; examine the accuracy and optimal sequencing of expensive diagnostic tests; and disseminate information to clinicians and patients to improve the process of care. This effort requires a multidisciplinary team of clinicans and methodologist, and a network of government and professional organizations concerned about the problem of low back pain. The team has documented wide geographic variations in rates of back surgery, and identified differences in surgical outcome according to patient age, diagnosis, and type of surgical procedure. Nonsurgical hospitalizations are declining, but remain common for inpatient myelography and pain control. The research team has provided data for an interactive computer-based videodisc to help patients with surgical decision making, and is disseminating data on practice patterns to surgeons in Washington State in an effort to reduce practice variabiltiy. Conclusions: This PORT has combined literature synthesis, administrative data, and prospective cohort studies to better define the variability and outcomes of alternative treatments for lumbar spine problems. The team is testing innovative methods for disseminating information to physicians and patients, with the hope of encouraging a more consistent and rational clinical approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)89-110
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Musculoskeletal Pain
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pain Measurement
Back Pain
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Hospitalization
Low Back Pain
Spine
Physicians
Myelography
Research
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Inpatients
Decision Making
Cohort Studies
Organizations
Prospective Studies
Pain

Keywords

  • Backache
  • Herniated disc
  • Lumbar spine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

The back pain outcome assessment team : Background and progress. / Loeser, John D.; Deyo, Richard (Rick); Cherkin, Daniel C.; Conrad, Douglas; Wiesman, John.

In: Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1993, p. 89-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Loeser, John D. ; Deyo, Richard (Rick) ; Cherkin, Daniel C. ; Conrad, Douglas ; Wiesman, John. / The back pain outcome assessment team : Background and progress. In: Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain. 1993 ; Vol. 1, No. 2. pp. 89-110.
@article{eb7c4af8a55e494c979b690e490c2f73,
title = "The back pain outcome assessment team: Background and progress",
abstract = "Objectives: To describe the federal initiative in outcomes research, the organization and structor of a Patient Outcomes Research Team [PORT] concerned with low back pain, and the early progress of this research team. Findings: Back pain is a leading reason for physician visits, hospitalization, and work disability. However, there is a paucity of valid evidence to support most current methods of treating spine disorders. This PORT was funded to study geographic variation in the use of back surgery and to better characterize its outcomes; evaluate the reasons for nonsurgical hospitalization for back pain; examine the accuracy and optimal sequencing of expensive diagnostic tests; and disseminate information to clinicians and patients to improve the process of care. This effort requires a multidisciplinary team of clinicans and methodologist, and a network of government and professional organizations concerned about the problem of low back pain. The team has documented wide geographic variations in rates of back surgery, and identified differences in surgical outcome according to patient age, diagnosis, and type of surgical procedure. Nonsurgical hospitalizations are declining, but remain common for inpatient myelography and pain control. The research team has provided data for an interactive computer-based videodisc to help patients with surgical decision making, and is disseminating data on practice patterns to surgeons in Washington State in an effort to reduce practice variabiltiy. Conclusions: This PORT has combined literature synthesis, administrative data, and prospective cohort studies to better define the variability and outcomes of alternative treatments for lumbar spine problems. The team is testing innovative methods for disseminating information to physicians and patients, with the hope of encouraging a more consistent and rational clinical approach.",
keywords = "Backache, Herniated disc, Lumbar spine",
author = "Loeser, {John D.} and Deyo, {Richard (Rick)} and Cherkin, {Daniel C.} and Douglas Conrad and John Wiesman",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1300/J094v01n02_07",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "89--110",
journal = "Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain",
issn = "1058-2452",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The back pain outcome assessment team

T2 - Background and progress

AU - Loeser, John D.

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

AU - Cherkin, Daniel C.

AU - Conrad, Douglas

AU - Wiesman, John

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Objectives: To describe the federal initiative in outcomes research, the organization and structor of a Patient Outcomes Research Team [PORT] concerned with low back pain, and the early progress of this research team. Findings: Back pain is a leading reason for physician visits, hospitalization, and work disability. However, there is a paucity of valid evidence to support most current methods of treating spine disorders. This PORT was funded to study geographic variation in the use of back surgery and to better characterize its outcomes; evaluate the reasons for nonsurgical hospitalization for back pain; examine the accuracy and optimal sequencing of expensive diagnostic tests; and disseminate information to clinicians and patients to improve the process of care. This effort requires a multidisciplinary team of clinicans and methodologist, and a network of government and professional organizations concerned about the problem of low back pain. The team has documented wide geographic variations in rates of back surgery, and identified differences in surgical outcome according to patient age, diagnosis, and type of surgical procedure. Nonsurgical hospitalizations are declining, but remain common for inpatient myelography and pain control. The research team has provided data for an interactive computer-based videodisc to help patients with surgical decision making, and is disseminating data on practice patterns to surgeons in Washington State in an effort to reduce practice variabiltiy. Conclusions: This PORT has combined literature synthesis, administrative data, and prospective cohort studies to better define the variability and outcomes of alternative treatments for lumbar spine problems. The team is testing innovative methods for disseminating information to physicians and patients, with the hope of encouraging a more consistent and rational clinical approach.

AB - Objectives: To describe the federal initiative in outcomes research, the organization and structor of a Patient Outcomes Research Team [PORT] concerned with low back pain, and the early progress of this research team. Findings: Back pain is a leading reason for physician visits, hospitalization, and work disability. However, there is a paucity of valid evidence to support most current methods of treating spine disorders. This PORT was funded to study geographic variation in the use of back surgery and to better characterize its outcomes; evaluate the reasons for nonsurgical hospitalization for back pain; examine the accuracy and optimal sequencing of expensive diagnostic tests; and disseminate information to clinicians and patients to improve the process of care. This effort requires a multidisciplinary team of clinicans and methodologist, and a network of government and professional organizations concerned about the problem of low back pain. The team has documented wide geographic variations in rates of back surgery, and identified differences in surgical outcome according to patient age, diagnosis, and type of surgical procedure. Nonsurgical hospitalizations are declining, but remain common for inpatient myelography and pain control. The research team has provided data for an interactive computer-based videodisc to help patients with surgical decision making, and is disseminating data on practice patterns to surgeons in Washington State in an effort to reduce practice variabiltiy. Conclusions: This PORT has combined literature synthesis, administrative data, and prospective cohort studies to better define the variability and outcomes of alternative treatments for lumbar spine problems. The team is testing innovative methods for disseminating information to physicians and patients, with the hope of encouraging a more consistent and rational clinical approach.

KW - Backache

KW - Herniated disc

KW - Lumbar spine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027153174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027153174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1300/J094v01n02_07

DO - 10.1300/J094v01n02_07

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0027153174

VL - 1

SP - 89

EP - 110

JO - Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain

JF - Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain

SN - 1058-2452

IS - 2

ER -