The association between persistent occiput posterior position and neonatal outcomes

Yvonne W. Cheng, Brian Shaffer, Aaron Caughey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of persistent occiput posterior position on neonatal outcome. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 31,392 term, cephalic, singleton births. Women with neonates born in persistent occiput posterior position at delivery were compared to those with occiput anterior position. Women with occiput transverse position were excluded. The association between occiput posterior position and neonatal outcomes, including 5-minute Apgar scores, umbilical cord gases, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, meconium aspiration syndrome, birth trauma, admission to the intensive care nursery, and length of stay were examined using χ2 and Student t tests. Potential confounders (maternal age, ethnicity, parity, gestational age, epidural anesthesia, labor induction, length of labor, meconium, chorioamnionitis, birth weight, and year of delivery) were controlled for by using multivariable logistic regression and linear regression analyses. RESULTS: There were 2,591 (8.2%) neonates delivered in occiput posterior position of the total cohort of 31,392 deliveries. Compared with occiput anterior, neonates delivered in occiput posterior position had higher risks for adverse outcomes, including 5-minute Apgar score less than 7 (odds ratio [OR] 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.91), acidemic umbilical cord gases (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.52-2.77), meconium-stained amniotic fluid (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.17-1.42), birth trauma (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.22-2.57), admission to the intensive care nursery (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.28-1.92), and longer neonatal stay in the hospital (OR 2.69, 95% CI 2.22-3.25). CONCLUSION: Persistent occiput posterior position at delivery is associated with higher risks of adverse neonatal outcomes compared with neonates delivered in the occiput anterior position. This information may be important in counseling women who experience persistent occiput posterior position in labor.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)837-844
Number of pages8
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
Volume107
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Meconium
Newborn Infant
Induced Labor
Apgar Score
Nurseries
Umbilical Cord
Parturition
Amniotic Fluid
Critical Care
Length of Stay
Gases
Meconium Aspiration Syndrome
Chorioamnionitis
Epidural Anesthesia
Maternal Age
Wounds and Injuries
Parity
Birth Weight

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

The association between persistent occiput posterior position and neonatal outcomes. / Cheng, Yvonne W.; Shaffer, Brian; Caughey, Aaron.

In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 107, No. 4, 04.2006, p. 837-844.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8ec6c2a1b3774462b485bfdc5fb86b65,
title = "The association between persistent occiput posterior position and neonatal outcomes",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of persistent occiput posterior position on neonatal outcome. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 31,392 term, cephalic, singleton births. Women with neonates born in persistent occiput posterior position at delivery were compared to those with occiput anterior position. Women with occiput transverse position were excluded. The association between occiput posterior position and neonatal outcomes, including 5-minute Apgar scores, umbilical cord gases, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, meconium aspiration syndrome, birth trauma, admission to the intensive care nursery, and length of stay were examined using χ2 and Student t tests. Potential confounders (maternal age, ethnicity, parity, gestational age, epidural anesthesia, labor induction, length of labor, meconium, chorioamnionitis, birth weight, and year of delivery) were controlled for by using multivariable logistic regression and linear regression analyses. RESULTS: There were 2,591 (8.2{\%}) neonates delivered in occiput posterior position of the total cohort of 31,392 deliveries. Compared with occiput anterior, neonates delivered in occiput posterior position had higher risks for adverse outcomes, including 5-minute Apgar score less than 7 (odds ratio [OR] 1.50, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.91), acidemic umbilical cord gases (OR 2.05, 95{\%} CI 1.52-2.77), meconium-stained amniotic fluid (OR 1.29, 95{\%} CI 1.17-1.42), birth trauma (OR 1.77, 95{\%} CI 1.22-2.57), admission to the intensive care nursery (OR 1.57, 95{\%} CI 1.28-1.92), and longer neonatal stay in the hospital (OR 2.69, 95{\%} CI 2.22-3.25). CONCLUSION: Persistent occiput posterior position at delivery is associated with higher risks of adverse neonatal outcomes compared with neonates delivered in the occiput anterior position. This information may be important in counseling women who experience persistent occiput posterior position in labor.",
author = "Cheng, {Yvonne W.} and Brian Shaffer and Aaron Caughey",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1097/01.AOG.0000206217.07883.a2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "107",
pages = "837--844",
journal = "Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0029-7844",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The association between persistent occiput posterior position and neonatal outcomes

AU - Cheng, Yvonne W.

AU - Shaffer, Brian

AU - Caughey, Aaron

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of persistent occiput posterior position on neonatal outcome. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 31,392 term, cephalic, singleton births. Women with neonates born in persistent occiput posterior position at delivery were compared to those with occiput anterior position. Women with occiput transverse position were excluded. The association between occiput posterior position and neonatal outcomes, including 5-minute Apgar scores, umbilical cord gases, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, meconium aspiration syndrome, birth trauma, admission to the intensive care nursery, and length of stay were examined using χ2 and Student t tests. Potential confounders (maternal age, ethnicity, parity, gestational age, epidural anesthesia, labor induction, length of labor, meconium, chorioamnionitis, birth weight, and year of delivery) were controlled for by using multivariable logistic regression and linear regression analyses. RESULTS: There were 2,591 (8.2%) neonates delivered in occiput posterior position of the total cohort of 31,392 deliveries. Compared with occiput anterior, neonates delivered in occiput posterior position had higher risks for adverse outcomes, including 5-minute Apgar score less than 7 (odds ratio [OR] 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.91), acidemic umbilical cord gases (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.52-2.77), meconium-stained amniotic fluid (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.17-1.42), birth trauma (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.22-2.57), admission to the intensive care nursery (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.28-1.92), and longer neonatal stay in the hospital (OR 2.69, 95% CI 2.22-3.25). CONCLUSION: Persistent occiput posterior position at delivery is associated with higher risks of adverse neonatal outcomes compared with neonates delivered in the occiput anterior position. This information may be important in counseling women who experience persistent occiput posterior position in labor.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of persistent occiput posterior position on neonatal outcome. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 31,392 term, cephalic, singleton births. Women with neonates born in persistent occiput posterior position at delivery were compared to those with occiput anterior position. Women with occiput transverse position were excluded. The association between occiput posterior position and neonatal outcomes, including 5-minute Apgar scores, umbilical cord gases, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, meconium aspiration syndrome, birth trauma, admission to the intensive care nursery, and length of stay were examined using χ2 and Student t tests. Potential confounders (maternal age, ethnicity, parity, gestational age, epidural anesthesia, labor induction, length of labor, meconium, chorioamnionitis, birth weight, and year of delivery) were controlled for by using multivariable logistic regression and linear regression analyses. RESULTS: There were 2,591 (8.2%) neonates delivered in occiput posterior position of the total cohort of 31,392 deliveries. Compared with occiput anterior, neonates delivered in occiput posterior position had higher risks for adverse outcomes, including 5-minute Apgar score less than 7 (odds ratio [OR] 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.91), acidemic umbilical cord gases (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.52-2.77), meconium-stained amniotic fluid (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.17-1.42), birth trauma (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.22-2.57), admission to the intensive care nursery (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.28-1.92), and longer neonatal stay in the hospital (OR 2.69, 95% CI 2.22-3.25). CONCLUSION: Persistent occiput posterior position at delivery is associated with higher risks of adverse neonatal outcomes compared with neonates delivered in the occiput anterior position. This information may be important in counseling women who experience persistent occiput posterior position in labor.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646095506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646095506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.AOG.0000206217.07883.a2

DO - 10.1097/01.AOG.0000206217.07883.a2

M3 - Article

C2 - 16582120

AN - SCOPUS:33646095506

VL - 107

SP - 837

EP - 844

JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0029-7844

IS - 4

ER -