The association between emergency department crowding and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chest pain

Jesse M. Pines, Charles V. Pollack, Deborah B. Diercks, Anna Marie Chang, Frances S. Shofer, Judd E. Hollander

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

154 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: While emergency department (ED) crowding is a worldwide problem, few studies have demonstrated associations between crowding and outcomes. The authors examined whether ED crowding was associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chest pain syndromes (chest pain or related complaints of possible cardiac origin). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for patients ≥30 years of age with chest pain syndrome admitted to a tertiary care academic hospital from 1999 through 2006. The authors compared rates of inpatient adverse outcomes from ED triage to hospital discharge, defined as delayed acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure, hypotension, dysrhythmias, and cardiac arrest, which occurred after ED arrival using five separate crowding measures. Results: Among 4,574 patients, 251 (4%) patients developed adverse outcomes after ED arrival; 803 (18%) had documented acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and of those, 273 (34%) had AMI. Compared to less crowded times, ACS patients experienced more adverse outcomes at the highest waiting room census (odds ratio [OR] = 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3 to 11.0) and patient-hours (OR = 5.2, 95% CI = 2.0 to 13.6) and trended toward more adverse outcomes during time of high ED occupancy (OR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.0 to 9.3). Adverse outcomes were not significantly more frequent during times with the highest number of admitted patients (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 0.6 to 4.1) or the highest trailing mean length of stay (LOS) for admitted patients transferred to inpatient beds within 6 hours (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 0.5 to 4.0). Patients with non-ACS chest pain experienced more adverse outcomes during the highest waiting room census (OR = 3.5, 95% CI = 1.4 to 8.4) and patient-hours (OR = 4.3, 95% CI = 2.6 to 7.3), but not occupancy (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 0.9 to 3.3), number of admitted patients (OR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.1), or trailing LOS for admitted patients (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 0.6 to 2.0). Conclusions: Therewas an association between somemeasures of ED crowding and a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with both ACS-related and non-ACS-related chest pain syndrome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)617-625
Number of pages9
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume16
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Chest Pain
Hospital Emergency Service
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Censuses
Inpatients
Length of Stay
Myocardial Infarction
Triage
Tertiary Healthcare
Heart Arrest
Hypotension
Heart Failure

Keywords

  • Adverse outcomes
  • Cardiovascular
  • Crowding
  • Emergency department
  • Health care
  • Overcrowding

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

The association between emergency department crowding and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chest pain. / Pines, Jesse M.; Pollack, Charles V.; Diercks, Deborah B.; Chang, Anna Marie; Shofer, Frances S.; Hollander, Judd E.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 7, 07.2009, p. 617-625.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pines, Jesse M. ; Pollack, Charles V. ; Diercks, Deborah B. ; Chang, Anna Marie ; Shofer, Frances S. ; Hollander, Judd E. / The association between emergency department crowding and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chest pain. In: Academic Emergency Medicine. 2009 ; Vol. 16, No. 7. pp. 617-625.
@article{b474ea0661c7452f99cdf6e3c2c1035f,
title = "The association between emergency department crowding and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chest pain",
abstract = "Objectives: While emergency department (ED) crowding is a worldwide problem, few studies have demonstrated associations between crowding and outcomes. The authors examined whether ED crowding was associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chest pain syndromes (chest pain or related complaints of possible cardiac origin). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for patients ≥30 years of age with chest pain syndrome admitted to a tertiary care academic hospital from 1999 through 2006. The authors compared rates of inpatient adverse outcomes from ED triage to hospital discharge, defined as delayed acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure, hypotension, dysrhythmias, and cardiac arrest, which occurred after ED arrival using five separate crowding measures. Results: Among 4,574 patients, 251 (4{\%}) patients developed adverse outcomes after ED arrival; 803 (18{\%}) had documented acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and of those, 273 (34{\%}) had AMI. Compared to less crowded times, ACS patients experienced more adverse outcomes at the highest waiting room census (odds ratio [OR] = 3.7, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] = 1.3 to 11.0) and patient-hours (OR = 5.2, 95{\%} CI = 2.0 to 13.6) and trended toward more adverse outcomes during time of high ED occupancy (OR = 3.1, 95{\%} CI = 1.0 to 9.3). Adverse outcomes were not significantly more frequent during times with the highest number of admitted patients (OR = 1.6, 95{\%} CI = 0.6 to 4.1) or the highest trailing mean length of stay (LOS) for admitted patients transferred to inpatient beds within 6 hours (OR = 1.5, 95{\%} CI = 0.5 to 4.0). Patients with non-ACS chest pain experienced more adverse outcomes during the highest waiting room census (OR = 3.5, 95{\%} CI = 1.4 to 8.4) and patient-hours (OR = 4.3, 95{\%} CI = 2.6 to 7.3), but not occupancy (OR = 1.8, 95{\%} CI = 0.9 to 3.3), number of admitted patients (OR = 0.6, 95{\%} CI 0.4 to 1.1), or trailing LOS for admitted patients (OR = 1.2, 95{\%} CI = 0.6 to 2.0). Conclusions: Therewas an association between somemeasures of ED crowding and a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with both ACS-related and non-ACS-related chest pain syndrome.",
keywords = "Adverse outcomes, Cardiovascular, Crowding, Emergency department, Health care, Overcrowding",
author = "Pines, {Jesse M.} and Pollack, {Charles V.} and Diercks, {Deborah B.} and Chang, {Anna Marie} and Shofer, {Frances S.} and Hollander, {Judd E.}",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00456.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "617--625",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The association between emergency department crowding and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chest pain

AU - Pines, Jesse M.

AU - Pollack, Charles V.

AU - Diercks, Deborah B.

AU - Chang, Anna Marie

AU - Shofer, Frances S.

AU - Hollander, Judd E.

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - Objectives: While emergency department (ED) crowding is a worldwide problem, few studies have demonstrated associations between crowding and outcomes. The authors examined whether ED crowding was associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chest pain syndromes (chest pain or related complaints of possible cardiac origin). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for patients ≥30 years of age with chest pain syndrome admitted to a tertiary care academic hospital from 1999 through 2006. The authors compared rates of inpatient adverse outcomes from ED triage to hospital discharge, defined as delayed acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure, hypotension, dysrhythmias, and cardiac arrest, which occurred after ED arrival using five separate crowding measures. Results: Among 4,574 patients, 251 (4%) patients developed adverse outcomes after ED arrival; 803 (18%) had documented acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and of those, 273 (34%) had AMI. Compared to less crowded times, ACS patients experienced more adverse outcomes at the highest waiting room census (odds ratio [OR] = 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3 to 11.0) and patient-hours (OR = 5.2, 95% CI = 2.0 to 13.6) and trended toward more adverse outcomes during time of high ED occupancy (OR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.0 to 9.3). Adverse outcomes were not significantly more frequent during times with the highest number of admitted patients (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 0.6 to 4.1) or the highest trailing mean length of stay (LOS) for admitted patients transferred to inpatient beds within 6 hours (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 0.5 to 4.0). Patients with non-ACS chest pain experienced more adverse outcomes during the highest waiting room census (OR = 3.5, 95% CI = 1.4 to 8.4) and patient-hours (OR = 4.3, 95% CI = 2.6 to 7.3), but not occupancy (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 0.9 to 3.3), number of admitted patients (OR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.1), or trailing LOS for admitted patients (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 0.6 to 2.0). Conclusions: Therewas an association between somemeasures of ED crowding and a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with both ACS-related and non-ACS-related chest pain syndrome.

AB - Objectives: While emergency department (ED) crowding is a worldwide problem, few studies have demonstrated associations between crowding and outcomes. The authors examined whether ED crowding was associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chest pain syndromes (chest pain or related complaints of possible cardiac origin). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for patients ≥30 years of age with chest pain syndrome admitted to a tertiary care academic hospital from 1999 through 2006. The authors compared rates of inpatient adverse outcomes from ED triage to hospital discharge, defined as delayed acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure, hypotension, dysrhythmias, and cardiac arrest, which occurred after ED arrival using five separate crowding measures. Results: Among 4,574 patients, 251 (4%) patients developed adverse outcomes after ED arrival; 803 (18%) had documented acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and of those, 273 (34%) had AMI. Compared to less crowded times, ACS patients experienced more adverse outcomes at the highest waiting room census (odds ratio [OR] = 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3 to 11.0) and patient-hours (OR = 5.2, 95% CI = 2.0 to 13.6) and trended toward more adverse outcomes during time of high ED occupancy (OR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.0 to 9.3). Adverse outcomes were not significantly more frequent during times with the highest number of admitted patients (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 0.6 to 4.1) or the highest trailing mean length of stay (LOS) for admitted patients transferred to inpatient beds within 6 hours (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 0.5 to 4.0). Patients with non-ACS chest pain experienced more adverse outcomes during the highest waiting room census (OR = 3.5, 95% CI = 1.4 to 8.4) and patient-hours (OR = 4.3, 95% CI = 2.6 to 7.3), but not occupancy (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 0.9 to 3.3), number of admitted patients (OR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.1), or trailing LOS for admitted patients (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 0.6 to 2.0). Conclusions: Therewas an association between somemeasures of ED crowding and a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with both ACS-related and non-ACS-related chest pain syndrome.

KW - Adverse outcomes

KW - Cardiovascular

KW - Crowding

KW - Emergency department

KW - Health care

KW - Overcrowding

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650243290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67650243290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00456.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00456.x

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 617

EP - 625

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 7

ER -