The ability to listen with independent ears

Frederick Gallun, Christine R. Mason, Gerald Kidd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In three experiments, listeners identified speech processed into narrow bands and presented to the right ("target") ear. The ability of listeners to ignore (or even use) conflicting contralateral stimulation was examined by presenting various maskers to the target ear (" ipsilateral") and nontarget ear ("contralateral"). Theoretically, an absence of contralateral interference would imply selectively attending to only the target ear; the presence of interference from the contralateral stimulus would imply that listeners were unable to treat the stimuli at the two ears independently; and improved performance in the presence of informative contralateral stimulation would imply that listeners can process the signals at both ears and keep them separate rather than combining them. Experiments showed evidence of the ability to selectively process (or respond to) only the target ear in some, but not all, conditions. No evidence was found for improved performance due to contralateral stimulation. The pattern of interference found across experiments supports an interaction of stimulus-based factors (auditory grouping) and task-based factors (demand for processing resources) and suggests that listeners may not always be able to listen to the "better" ear even when it would be beneficial to do so.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2814-2825
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume122
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

ear
stimulation
stimuli
interference
Ear
narrowband
resources
Listeners
Experiment
Stimulus
Interference
Stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

The ability to listen with independent ears. / Gallun, Frederick; Mason, Christine R.; Kidd, Gerald.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 122, No. 5, 2007, p. 2814-2825.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gallun, Frederick ; Mason, Christine R. ; Kidd, Gerald. / The ability to listen with independent ears. In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2007 ; Vol. 122, No. 5. pp. 2814-2825.
@article{b5f729c8608c42c78741d4b95a9d2c81,
title = "The ability to listen with independent ears",
abstract = "In three experiments, listeners identified speech processed into narrow bands and presented to the right ({"}target{"}) ear. The ability of listeners to ignore (or even use) conflicting contralateral stimulation was examined by presenting various maskers to the target ear ({"} ipsilateral{"}) and nontarget ear ({"}contralateral{"}). Theoretically, an absence of contralateral interference would imply selectively attending to only the target ear; the presence of interference from the contralateral stimulus would imply that listeners were unable to treat the stimuli at the two ears independently; and improved performance in the presence of informative contralateral stimulation would imply that listeners can process the signals at both ears and keep them separate rather than combining them. Experiments showed evidence of the ability to selectively process (or respond to) only the target ear in some, but not all, conditions. No evidence was found for improved performance due to contralateral stimulation. The pattern of interference found across experiments supports an interaction of stimulus-based factors (auditory grouping) and task-based factors (demand for processing resources) and suggests that listeners may not always be able to listen to the {"}better{"} ear even when it would be beneficial to do so.",
author = "Frederick Gallun and Mason, {Christine R.} and Gerald Kidd",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1121/1.2780143",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "122",
pages = "2814--2825",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ability to listen with independent ears

AU - Gallun, Frederick

AU - Mason, Christine R.

AU - Kidd, Gerald

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - In three experiments, listeners identified speech processed into narrow bands and presented to the right ("target") ear. The ability of listeners to ignore (or even use) conflicting contralateral stimulation was examined by presenting various maskers to the target ear (" ipsilateral") and nontarget ear ("contralateral"). Theoretically, an absence of contralateral interference would imply selectively attending to only the target ear; the presence of interference from the contralateral stimulus would imply that listeners were unable to treat the stimuli at the two ears independently; and improved performance in the presence of informative contralateral stimulation would imply that listeners can process the signals at both ears and keep them separate rather than combining them. Experiments showed evidence of the ability to selectively process (or respond to) only the target ear in some, but not all, conditions. No evidence was found for improved performance due to contralateral stimulation. The pattern of interference found across experiments supports an interaction of stimulus-based factors (auditory grouping) and task-based factors (demand for processing resources) and suggests that listeners may not always be able to listen to the "better" ear even when it would be beneficial to do so.

AB - In three experiments, listeners identified speech processed into narrow bands and presented to the right ("target") ear. The ability of listeners to ignore (or even use) conflicting contralateral stimulation was examined by presenting various maskers to the target ear (" ipsilateral") and nontarget ear ("contralateral"). Theoretically, an absence of contralateral interference would imply selectively attending to only the target ear; the presence of interference from the contralateral stimulus would imply that listeners were unable to treat the stimuli at the two ears independently; and improved performance in the presence of informative contralateral stimulation would imply that listeners can process the signals at both ears and keep them separate rather than combining them. Experiments showed evidence of the ability to selectively process (or respond to) only the target ear in some, but not all, conditions. No evidence was found for improved performance due to contralateral stimulation. The pattern of interference found across experiments supports an interaction of stimulus-based factors (auditory grouping) and task-based factors (demand for processing resources) and suggests that listeners may not always be able to listen to the "better" ear even when it would be beneficial to do so.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38049022105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38049022105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.2780143

DO - 10.1121/1.2780143

M3 - Article

C2 - 18189571

AN - SCOPUS:38049022105

VL - 122

SP - 2814

EP - 2825

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 5

ER -