Ten myths about decision-making capacity

Linda Ganzini, Ladislav Volicer, William A. Nelson, Ellen Fox, Arthur R. Derse

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    52 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    As a matter of practical reality, what role patients will play in decisions about their health care is determined by whether their clinicians judge them to have decision-making capacity. Because so much hinges on assessments of capacity, clinicians who work with patients have an ethical obligation to understand this concept. This article, based on a report prepared by the National Ethics Committee (NEC) of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), seeks to provide clinicians with practical information about decision-making capacity and how it is assessed. A study of clinicians and ethics committee chairs carried out under the auspices of the NEC identified the following 10 common myths clinicians hold about decision-making capacity: (1) decision-making capacity and competency are the same; (2) lack of decision-making capacity can be presumed when patients go against medical advice; (3) there is no need to assess decision-making capacity unless patients go against medical advice; (4) decision-making capacity is an "all or nothing" phenomenon; (5) cognitive impairment equals lack of decision-making capacity; (6) lack of decision-making capacity is a permanent condition; (7) patients who have not been given relevant and consistent information about their treatment lack decision-making capacity; (8) all patients with certain psychiatric disorders lack decision-making capacity; (9) patients who are involuntarily committed lack decision-making capacity; and (10) only mental health experts can assess decision-making capacity. By describing and debunking these common misconceptions, this article attempts to prevent potential errors in the clinical assessment of decision-making capacity, thereby supporting patients' right to make choices about their own health care.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)263-267
    Number of pages5
    JournalJournal of the American Medical Directors Association
    Volume5
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 2004

    Fingerprint

    Decision Making
    Ethics Committees
    Veterans Health
    Delivery of Health Care
    United States Department of Veterans Affairs
    Patient Rights
    Psychiatry
    Mental Health

    Keywords

    • Decision-making capacity
    • Ethics
    • Informed consent

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Medicine(all)

    Cite this

    Ten myths about decision-making capacity. / Ganzini, Linda; Volicer, Ladislav; Nelson, William A.; Fox, Ellen; Derse, Arthur R.

    In: Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, Vol. 5, No. 4, 07.2004, p. 263-267.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Ganzini, Linda ; Volicer, Ladislav ; Nelson, William A. ; Fox, Ellen ; Derse, Arthur R. / Ten myths about decision-making capacity. In: Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2004 ; Vol. 5, No. 4. pp. 263-267.
    @article{ffe78120bdd249c483f0a58bbec625cc,
    title = "Ten myths about decision-making capacity",
    abstract = "As a matter of practical reality, what role patients will play in decisions about their health care is determined by whether their clinicians judge them to have decision-making capacity. Because so much hinges on assessments of capacity, clinicians who work with patients have an ethical obligation to understand this concept. This article, based on a report prepared by the National Ethics Committee (NEC) of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), seeks to provide clinicians with practical information about decision-making capacity and how it is assessed. A study of clinicians and ethics committee chairs carried out under the auspices of the NEC identified the following 10 common myths clinicians hold about decision-making capacity: (1) decision-making capacity and competency are the same; (2) lack of decision-making capacity can be presumed when patients go against medical advice; (3) there is no need to assess decision-making capacity unless patients go against medical advice; (4) decision-making capacity is an {"}all or nothing{"} phenomenon; (5) cognitive impairment equals lack of decision-making capacity; (6) lack of decision-making capacity is a permanent condition; (7) patients who have not been given relevant and consistent information about their treatment lack decision-making capacity; (8) all patients with certain psychiatric disorders lack decision-making capacity; (9) patients who are involuntarily committed lack decision-making capacity; and (10) only mental health experts can assess decision-making capacity. By describing and debunking these common misconceptions, this article attempts to prevent potential errors in the clinical assessment of decision-making capacity, thereby supporting patients' right to make choices about their own health care.",
    keywords = "Decision-making capacity, Ethics, Informed consent",
    author = "Linda Ganzini and Ladislav Volicer and Nelson, {William A.} and Ellen Fox and Derse, {Arthur R.}",
    year = "2004",
    month = "7",
    doi = "10.1016/S1525-8610(04)70134-6",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "5",
    pages = "263--267",
    journal = "Journal of the American Medical Directors Association",
    issn = "1525-8610",
    publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Ten myths about decision-making capacity

    AU - Ganzini, Linda

    AU - Volicer, Ladislav

    AU - Nelson, William A.

    AU - Fox, Ellen

    AU - Derse, Arthur R.

    PY - 2004/7

    Y1 - 2004/7

    N2 - As a matter of practical reality, what role patients will play in decisions about their health care is determined by whether their clinicians judge them to have decision-making capacity. Because so much hinges on assessments of capacity, clinicians who work with patients have an ethical obligation to understand this concept. This article, based on a report prepared by the National Ethics Committee (NEC) of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), seeks to provide clinicians with practical information about decision-making capacity and how it is assessed. A study of clinicians and ethics committee chairs carried out under the auspices of the NEC identified the following 10 common myths clinicians hold about decision-making capacity: (1) decision-making capacity and competency are the same; (2) lack of decision-making capacity can be presumed when patients go against medical advice; (3) there is no need to assess decision-making capacity unless patients go against medical advice; (4) decision-making capacity is an "all or nothing" phenomenon; (5) cognitive impairment equals lack of decision-making capacity; (6) lack of decision-making capacity is a permanent condition; (7) patients who have not been given relevant and consistent information about their treatment lack decision-making capacity; (8) all patients with certain psychiatric disorders lack decision-making capacity; (9) patients who are involuntarily committed lack decision-making capacity; and (10) only mental health experts can assess decision-making capacity. By describing and debunking these common misconceptions, this article attempts to prevent potential errors in the clinical assessment of decision-making capacity, thereby supporting patients' right to make choices about their own health care.

    AB - As a matter of practical reality, what role patients will play in decisions about their health care is determined by whether their clinicians judge them to have decision-making capacity. Because so much hinges on assessments of capacity, clinicians who work with patients have an ethical obligation to understand this concept. This article, based on a report prepared by the National Ethics Committee (NEC) of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), seeks to provide clinicians with practical information about decision-making capacity and how it is assessed. A study of clinicians and ethics committee chairs carried out under the auspices of the NEC identified the following 10 common myths clinicians hold about decision-making capacity: (1) decision-making capacity and competency are the same; (2) lack of decision-making capacity can be presumed when patients go against medical advice; (3) there is no need to assess decision-making capacity unless patients go against medical advice; (4) decision-making capacity is an "all or nothing" phenomenon; (5) cognitive impairment equals lack of decision-making capacity; (6) lack of decision-making capacity is a permanent condition; (7) patients who have not been given relevant and consistent information about their treatment lack decision-making capacity; (8) all patients with certain psychiatric disorders lack decision-making capacity; (9) patients who are involuntarily committed lack decision-making capacity; and (10) only mental health experts can assess decision-making capacity. By describing and debunking these common misconceptions, this article attempts to prevent potential errors in the clinical assessment of decision-making capacity, thereby supporting patients' right to make choices about their own health care.

    KW - Decision-making capacity

    KW - Ethics

    KW - Informed consent

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4143083966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4143083966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/S1525-8610(04)70134-6

    DO - 10.1016/S1525-8610(04)70134-6

    M3 - Article

    VL - 5

    SP - 263

    EP - 267

    JO - Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

    JF - Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

    SN - 1525-8610

    IS - 4

    ER -