Survival of seriously injured patients first treated in rural hospitals

Richard Mullins, Jerris R. Hedges, Donna J. Rowland, Melanie Arthur, N. Clay Mann, Daniel D. Price, Christine J. Olson, Gregory J. Jurkovich

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    38 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: Patients injured in rural counties are hypothesized to have improved survival if local hospitals are categorized as Level III, Level IV, and Level V trauma centers. Methods: Data were abstracted on patients with brain, liver, or spleen injuries who were first treated in 16 rural hospitals in Oregon (with categorized trauma centers) and 16 hospitals in Washington (without categorized trauma centers). Logistic regression models evaluated survival up to 30 days after hospital discharge. Results: Among Oregon's 642 study patients, 63% were transferred to another hospital. Among Washington's 624 patients, a higher proportion, 70%, were transferred. Risk-adjusted odds of death for Washington patients (reference odds, 1) were the same as for Oregon patients (odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-1.28). Most patients died after transfer to another hospital. Conclusion: In states with a prevailing practice of promptly transferring brain-injured patients, survival of these patients may not be enhanced by categorization of hospitals as rural trauma centers. To further improve the outcome of these patients, policy makers should adjust statewide trauma system guidelines to enhance integration and to perfect coordination among sequential decision makers.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1019-1029
    Number of pages11
    JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
    Volume52
    Issue number6
    StatePublished - 2002

    Fingerprint

    Rural Hospitals
    Survival
    Trauma Centers
    Logistic Models
    Wounds and Injuries
    Brain
    Administrative Personnel
    Spleen
    Odds Ratio
    Guidelines
    Confidence Intervals

    Keywords

    • Injury
    • Rural
    • Survival
    • Trauma center categorization
    • Trauma systems

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Surgery

    Cite this

    Mullins, R., Hedges, J. R., Rowland, D. J., Arthur, M., Mann, N. C., Price, D. D., ... Jurkovich, G. J. (2002). Survival of seriously injured patients first treated in rural hospitals. Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, 52(6), 1019-1029.

    Survival of seriously injured patients first treated in rural hospitals. / Mullins, Richard; Hedges, Jerris R.; Rowland, Donna J.; Arthur, Melanie; Mann, N. Clay; Price, Daniel D.; Olson, Christine J.; Jurkovich, Gregory J.

    In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 52, No. 6, 2002, p. 1019-1029.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Mullins, R, Hedges, JR, Rowland, DJ, Arthur, M, Mann, NC, Price, DD, Olson, CJ & Jurkovich, GJ 2002, 'Survival of seriously injured patients first treated in rural hospitals', Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1019-1029.
    Mullins, Richard ; Hedges, Jerris R. ; Rowland, Donna J. ; Arthur, Melanie ; Mann, N. Clay ; Price, Daniel D. ; Olson, Christine J. ; Jurkovich, Gregory J. / Survival of seriously injured patients first treated in rural hospitals. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 2002 ; Vol. 52, No. 6. pp. 1019-1029.
    @article{20c7fc8877384fc4bfe99f2108523e4e,
    title = "Survival of seriously injured patients first treated in rural hospitals",
    abstract = "Background: Patients injured in rural counties are hypothesized to have improved survival if local hospitals are categorized as Level III, Level IV, and Level V trauma centers. Methods: Data were abstracted on patients with brain, liver, or spleen injuries who were first treated in 16 rural hospitals in Oregon (with categorized trauma centers) and 16 hospitals in Washington (without categorized trauma centers). Logistic regression models evaluated survival up to 30 days after hospital discharge. Results: Among Oregon's 642 study patients, 63{\%} were transferred to another hospital. Among Washington's 624 patients, a higher proportion, 70{\%}, were transferred. Risk-adjusted odds of death for Washington patients (reference odds, 1) were the same as for Oregon patients (odds ratio, 0.82; 95{\%} confidence interval, 0.53-1.28). Most patients died after transfer to another hospital. Conclusion: In states with a prevailing practice of promptly transferring brain-injured patients, survival of these patients may not be enhanced by categorization of hospitals as rural trauma centers. To further improve the outcome of these patients, policy makers should adjust statewide trauma system guidelines to enhance integration and to perfect coordination among sequential decision makers.",
    keywords = "Injury, Rural, Survival, Trauma center categorization, Trauma systems",
    author = "Richard Mullins and Hedges, {Jerris R.} and Rowland, {Donna J.} and Melanie Arthur and Mann, {N. Clay} and Price, {Daniel D.} and Olson, {Christine J.} and Jurkovich, {Gregory J.}",
    year = "2002",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "52",
    pages = "1019--1029",
    journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
    issn = "2163-0755",
    publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
    number = "6",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Survival of seriously injured patients first treated in rural hospitals

    AU - Mullins, Richard

    AU - Hedges, Jerris R.

    AU - Rowland, Donna J.

    AU - Arthur, Melanie

    AU - Mann, N. Clay

    AU - Price, Daniel D.

    AU - Olson, Christine J.

    AU - Jurkovich, Gregory J.

    PY - 2002

    Y1 - 2002

    N2 - Background: Patients injured in rural counties are hypothesized to have improved survival if local hospitals are categorized as Level III, Level IV, and Level V trauma centers. Methods: Data were abstracted on patients with brain, liver, or spleen injuries who were first treated in 16 rural hospitals in Oregon (with categorized trauma centers) and 16 hospitals in Washington (without categorized trauma centers). Logistic regression models evaluated survival up to 30 days after hospital discharge. Results: Among Oregon's 642 study patients, 63% were transferred to another hospital. Among Washington's 624 patients, a higher proportion, 70%, were transferred. Risk-adjusted odds of death for Washington patients (reference odds, 1) were the same as for Oregon patients (odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-1.28). Most patients died after transfer to another hospital. Conclusion: In states with a prevailing practice of promptly transferring brain-injured patients, survival of these patients may not be enhanced by categorization of hospitals as rural trauma centers. To further improve the outcome of these patients, policy makers should adjust statewide trauma system guidelines to enhance integration and to perfect coordination among sequential decision makers.

    AB - Background: Patients injured in rural counties are hypothesized to have improved survival if local hospitals are categorized as Level III, Level IV, and Level V trauma centers. Methods: Data were abstracted on patients with brain, liver, or spleen injuries who were first treated in 16 rural hospitals in Oregon (with categorized trauma centers) and 16 hospitals in Washington (without categorized trauma centers). Logistic regression models evaluated survival up to 30 days after hospital discharge. Results: Among Oregon's 642 study patients, 63% were transferred to another hospital. Among Washington's 624 patients, a higher proportion, 70%, were transferred. Risk-adjusted odds of death for Washington patients (reference odds, 1) were the same as for Oregon patients (odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-1.28). Most patients died after transfer to another hospital. Conclusion: In states with a prevailing practice of promptly transferring brain-injured patients, survival of these patients may not be enhanced by categorization of hospitals as rural trauma centers. To further improve the outcome of these patients, policy makers should adjust statewide trauma system guidelines to enhance integration and to perfect coordination among sequential decision makers.

    KW - Injury

    KW - Rural

    KW - Survival

    KW - Trauma center categorization

    KW - Trauma systems

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036087110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036087110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    VL - 52

    SP - 1019

    EP - 1029

    JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

    JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

    SN - 2163-0755

    IS - 6

    ER -