Survival After Application of Automatic External Defibrillators Before Arrival of the Emergency Medical System. Evaluation in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Population of 21 Million

Myron L. Weisfeldt, Colleen M. Sitlani, Joseph P. Ornato, Thomas Rea, Tom P. Aufderheide, Daniel Davis, Jonathan Dreyer, Erik P. Hess, Jonathan Jui, Justin Maloney, George Sopko, Judy Powell, Graham Nichol, Laurie J. Morrison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

308 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of contemporary automatic external defibrillator (AED) use. Background: In the PAD (Public Access Defibrillation) trial, survival was doubled by focused training of lay volunteers to use an AED in high-risk public settings. Methods: We performed a population-based cohort study of persons with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest before emergency medical system (EMS) arrival at Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) sites between December 2005 and May 2007. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the independent association between AED application and survival to hospital discharge. Results: Of 13,769 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, 4,403 (32.0%) received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation but had no AED applied before EMS arrival, and 289 (2.1%) had an AED applied before EMS arrival. The AED was applied by health care workers (32%), lay volunteers (35%), police (26%), or unknown (7%). Overall survival to hospital discharge was 7%. Survival was 9% (382 of 4,403) with bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation but no AED, 24% (69 of 289) with AED application, and 38% (64 of 170) with AED shock delivered. In multivariable analyses adjusting for: 1) age and sex; 2) bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed; 3) location of arrest (public or private); 4) EMS response interval; 5) arrest witnessed; 6) initial shockable or not shockable rhythm; and 7) study site, AED application was associated with greater likelihood of survival (odds ratio: 1.75; 95% confidence interval: 1.23 to 2.50; p <0.002). Extrapolating this greater survival from the ROC EMS population base (21 million) to the population of the U.S. and Canada (330 million), AED application by bystanders seems to save 474 lives/year. Conclusions: Application of an AED in communities is associated with nearly a doubling of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. These results reinforce the importance of strategically expanding community-based AED programs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1713-1720
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume55
Issue number16
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 20 2010

Fingerprint

Defibrillators
Resuscitation
Emergencies
Survival
Population
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Volunteers
Police
Canada
Shock
Cohort Studies

Keywords

  • automatic external defibrillator
  • cardiac arrest
  • cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • defibrillation
  • resuscitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Survival After Application of Automatic External Defibrillators Before Arrival of the Emergency Medical System. Evaluation in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Population of 21 Million. / Weisfeldt, Myron L.; Sitlani, Colleen M.; Ornato, Joseph P.; Rea, Thomas; Aufderheide, Tom P.; Davis, Daniel; Dreyer, Jonathan; Hess, Erik P.; Jui, Jonathan; Maloney, Justin; Sopko, George; Powell, Judy; Nichol, Graham; Morrison, Laurie J.

In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 55, No. 16, 20.04.2010, p. 1713-1720.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Weisfeldt, ML, Sitlani, CM, Ornato, JP, Rea, T, Aufderheide, TP, Davis, D, Dreyer, J, Hess, EP, Jui, J, Maloney, J, Sopko, G, Powell, J, Nichol, G & Morrison, LJ 2010, 'Survival After Application of Automatic External Defibrillators Before Arrival of the Emergency Medical System. Evaluation in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Population of 21 Million', Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 55, no. 16, pp. 1713-1720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.077
Weisfeldt, Myron L. ; Sitlani, Colleen M. ; Ornato, Joseph P. ; Rea, Thomas ; Aufderheide, Tom P. ; Davis, Daniel ; Dreyer, Jonathan ; Hess, Erik P. ; Jui, Jonathan ; Maloney, Justin ; Sopko, George ; Powell, Judy ; Nichol, Graham ; Morrison, Laurie J. / Survival After Application of Automatic External Defibrillators Before Arrival of the Emergency Medical System. Evaluation in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Population of 21 Million. In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2010 ; Vol. 55, No. 16. pp. 1713-1720.
@article{9c404b04bff14dd5956a570f87d7543a,
title = "Survival After Application of Automatic External Defibrillators Before Arrival of the Emergency Medical System. Evaluation in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Population of 21 Million",
abstract = "Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of contemporary automatic external defibrillator (AED) use. Background: In the PAD (Public Access Defibrillation) trial, survival was doubled by focused training of lay volunteers to use an AED in high-risk public settings. Methods: We performed a population-based cohort study of persons with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest before emergency medical system (EMS) arrival at Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) sites between December 2005 and May 2007. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the independent association between AED application and survival to hospital discharge. Results: Of 13,769 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, 4,403 (32.0{\%}) received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation but had no AED applied before EMS arrival, and 289 (2.1{\%}) had an AED applied before EMS arrival. The AED was applied by health care workers (32{\%}), lay volunteers (35{\%}), police (26{\%}), or unknown (7{\%}). Overall survival to hospital discharge was 7{\%}. Survival was 9{\%} (382 of 4,403) with bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation but no AED, 24{\%} (69 of 289) with AED application, and 38{\%} (64 of 170) with AED shock delivered. In multivariable analyses adjusting for: 1) age and sex; 2) bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed; 3) location of arrest (public or private); 4) EMS response interval; 5) arrest witnessed; 6) initial shockable or not shockable rhythm; and 7) study site, AED application was associated with greater likelihood of survival (odds ratio: 1.75; 95{\%} confidence interval: 1.23 to 2.50; p <0.002). Extrapolating this greater survival from the ROC EMS population base (21 million) to the population of the U.S. and Canada (330 million), AED application by bystanders seems to save 474 lives/year. Conclusions: Application of an AED in communities is associated with nearly a doubling of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. These results reinforce the importance of strategically expanding community-based AED programs.",
keywords = "automatic external defibrillator, cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillation, resuscitation",
author = "Weisfeldt, {Myron L.} and Sitlani, {Colleen M.} and Ornato, {Joseph P.} and Thomas Rea and Aufderheide, {Tom P.} and Daniel Davis and Jonathan Dreyer and Hess, {Erik P.} and Jonathan Jui and Justin Maloney and George Sopko and Judy Powell and Graham Nichol and Morrison, {Laurie J.}",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.077",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "1713--1720",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Cardiology",
issn = "0735-1097",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "16",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Survival After Application of Automatic External Defibrillators Before Arrival of the Emergency Medical System. Evaluation in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Population of 21 Million

AU - Weisfeldt, Myron L.

AU - Sitlani, Colleen M.

AU - Ornato, Joseph P.

AU - Rea, Thomas

AU - Aufderheide, Tom P.

AU - Davis, Daniel

AU - Dreyer, Jonathan

AU - Hess, Erik P.

AU - Jui, Jonathan

AU - Maloney, Justin

AU - Sopko, George

AU - Powell, Judy

AU - Nichol, Graham

AU - Morrison, Laurie J.

PY - 2010/4/20

Y1 - 2010/4/20

N2 - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of contemporary automatic external defibrillator (AED) use. Background: In the PAD (Public Access Defibrillation) trial, survival was doubled by focused training of lay volunteers to use an AED in high-risk public settings. Methods: We performed a population-based cohort study of persons with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest before emergency medical system (EMS) arrival at Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) sites between December 2005 and May 2007. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the independent association between AED application and survival to hospital discharge. Results: Of 13,769 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, 4,403 (32.0%) received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation but had no AED applied before EMS arrival, and 289 (2.1%) had an AED applied before EMS arrival. The AED was applied by health care workers (32%), lay volunteers (35%), police (26%), or unknown (7%). Overall survival to hospital discharge was 7%. Survival was 9% (382 of 4,403) with bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation but no AED, 24% (69 of 289) with AED application, and 38% (64 of 170) with AED shock delivered. In multivariable analyses adjusting for: 1) age and sex; 2) bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed; 3) location of arrest (public or private); 4) EMS response interval; 5) arrest witnessed; 6) initial shockable or not shockable rhythm; and 7) study site, AED application was associated with greater likelihood of survival (odds ratio: 1.75; 95% confidence interval: 1.23 to 2.50; p <0.002). Extrapolating this greater survival from the ROC EMS population base (21 million) to the population of the U.S. and Canada (330 million), AED application by bystanders seems to save 474 lives/year. Conclusions: Application of an AED in communities is associated with nearly a doubling of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. These results reinforce the importance of strategically expanding community-based AED programs.

AB - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of contemporary automatic external defibrillator (AED) use. Background: In the PAD (Public Access Defibrillation) trial, survival was doubled by focused training of lay volunteers to use an AED in high-risk public settings. Methods: We performed a population-based cohort study of persons with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest before emergency medical system (EMS) arrival at Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) sites between December 2005 and May 2007. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the independent association between AED application and survival to hospital discharge. Results: Of 13,769 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, 4,403 (32.0%) received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation but had no AED applied before EMS arrival, and 289 (2.1%) had an AED applied before EMS arrival. The AED was applied by health care workers (32%), lay volunteers (35%), police (26%), or unknown (7%). Overall survival to hospital discharge was 7%. Survival was 9% (382 of 4,403) with bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation but no AED, 24% (69 of 289) with AED application, and 38% (64 of 170) with AED shock delivered. In multivariable analyses adjusting for: 1) age and sex; 2) bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed; 3) location of arrest (public or private); 4) EMS response interval; 5) arrest witnessed; 6) initial shockable or not shockable rhythm; and 7) study site, AED application was associated with greater likelihood of survival (odds ratio: 1.75; 95% confidence interval: 1.23 to 2.50; p <0.002). Extrapolating this greater survival from the ROC EMS population base (21 million) to the population of the U.S. and Canada (330 million), AED application by bystanders seems to save 474 lives/year. Conclusions: Application of an AED in communities is associated with nearly a doubling of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. These results reinforce the importance of strategically expanding community-based AED programs.

KW - automatic external defibrillator

KW - cardiac arrest

KW - cardiopulmonary resuscitation

KW - defibrillation

KW - resuscitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950593102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950593102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.077

DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.077

M3 - Article

C2 - 20394876

AN - SCOPUS:77950593102

VL - 55

SP - 1713

EP - 1720

JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

SN - 0735-1097

IS - 16

ER -