Survey of forensic psychiatrists on evaluation and treatment of prisoners on death row

G. B. Leong, J. A. Silva, R. Weinstock, Linda Ganzini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Psychiatrists have debated their role in evaluating prisoners accused of capital crimes and in treating prisoners on death row when restoration of competence would result in execution. Despite debate, there are no previous surveys of psychiatrists' opinions on this issue. We sent an anonymous questionnaire to all board-certified forensic psychiatrists in the United States. Of the 456 forensic psychiatrists identified, 290 (64%) returned the survey. Most respondents supported a role, in at least some cases, for psychiatric evaluation of prisoners accused of capital crimes. Respondents were divided on whether or not psychiatrists should treat incompetent death row prisoners if restoration of competence would result in execution. Attitudes about the ethical acceptability of capital punishment were associated with views about the psychiatrists' role but were not determinative in every case.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)427-432
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
Volume28
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prisoners
psychiatrist
prisoner
Psychiatry
death
evaluation
accused
restoration
Crime
Mental Competency
Therapeutics
offense
Capital Punishment
Surveys and Questionnaires
penalty
questionnaire

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Survey of forensic psychiatrists on evaluation and treatment of prisoners on death row. / Leong, G. B.; Silva, J. A.; Weinstock, R.; Ganzini, Linda.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2000, p. 427-432.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3512981aadcf4ded91ad9de65d4ed39f,
title = "Survey of forensic psychiatrists on evaluation and treatment of prisoners on death row",
abstract = "Psychiatrists have debated their role in evaluating prisoners accused of capital crimes and in treating prisoners on death row when restoration of competence would result in execution. Despite debate, there are no previous surveys of psychiatrists' opinions on this issue. We sent an anonymous questionnaire to all board-certified forensic psychiatrists in the United States. Of the 456 forensic psychiatrists identified, 290 (64{\%}) returned the survey. Most respondents supported a role, in at least some cases, for psychiatric evaluation of prisoners accused of capital crimes. Respondents were divided on whether or not psychiatrists should treat incompetent death row prisoners if restoration of competence would result in execution. Attitudes about the ethical acceptability of capital punishment were associated with views about the psychiatrists' role but were not determinative in every case.",
author = "Leong, {G. B.} and Silva, {J. A.} and R. Weinstock and Linda Ganzini",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "427--432",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
issn = "1093-6793",
publisher = "American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Survey of forensic psychiatrists on evaluation and treatment of prisoners on death row

AU - Leong, G. B.

AU - Silva, J. A.

AU - Weinstock, R.

AU - Ganzini, Linda

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Psychiatrists have debated their role in evaluating prisoners accused of capital crimes and in treating prisoners on death row when restoration of competence would result in execution. Despite debate, there are no previous surveys of psychiatrists' opinions on this issue. We sent an anonymous questionnaire to all board-certified forensic psychiatrists in the United States. Of the 456 forensic psychiatrists identified, 290 (64%) returned the survey. Most respondents supported a role, in at least some cases, for psychiatric evaluation of prisoners accused of capital crimes. Respondents were divided on whether or not psychiatrists should treat incompetent death row prisoners if restoration of competence would result in execution. Attitudes about the ethical acceptability of capital punishment were associated with views about the psychiatrists' role but were not determinative in every case.

AB - Psychiatrists have debated their role in evaluating prisoners accused of capital crimes and in treating prisoners on death row when restoration of competence would result in execution. Despite debate, there are no previous surveys of psychiatrists' opinions on this issue. We sent an anonymous questionnaire to all board-certified forensic psychiatrists in the United States. Of the 456 forensic psychiatrists identified, 290 (64%) returned the survey. Most respondents supported a role, in at least some cases, for psychiatric evaluation of prisoners accused of capital crimes. Respondents were divided on whether or not psychiatrists should treat incompetent death row prisoners if restoration of competence would result in execution. Attitudes about the ethical acceptability of capital punishment were associated with views about the psychiatrists' role but were not determinative in every case.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034494432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034494432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11196252

AN - SCOPUS:0034494432

VL - 28

SP - 427

EP - 432

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

SN - 1093-6793

IS - 4

ER -