Surgical renal artery reconstruction without contrast arteriography: The role of clinical profiling and magnetic resonance angiography

R. P. Cambria, John Kaufman, D. C. Brewster, J. P. Gertler, G. M. LaMuraglia, H. Bazari, W. M. Abbott, J. Jorgensen, R. Gusberg, J. Mannick, K. C. Kent, D. Gorin, F. Logerfo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Contrast arteriography is the accepted gold standard for diagnosis and treatment planning in patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease (RVD). In this study, the results of a selective policy of surgical renal artery reconstruction (RAR) with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) as the sole preoperative imaging modality are reviewed. Methods: From May 1993 to May 1998, 25 patients underwent RAR after clinical evaluation, and aortic/renal MRA performed with a gadolinium-enhanced and 3- dimensional phase contrast technique. Clinical presentations suggested severe RVD in all patients and included poorly controlled hypertension (16 patients), hospitalization for hypertensive crises and/or acute pulmonary edema (13), and deterioration of renal function within one year of operation (15). Thirteen patients had associated aortic pathologic conditions (12 aneurysms, 1 aortoiliac occlusive disease), and eight of these patients also underwent noncontrast computed tomography scans. Significant renal dysfunction (serum creatinine level, ≥2.0 mg/dL) was present in all but 4 patients with 14 of 25 patients having extreme (creatinine level, ≥3.0 mg/dL) dysfunction. Results: Hemodynamically significant RVD in the main renal artery was verified at operation in 37 of 38 reconstructed main renal arteries (24/25 patients). A single accessory renal artery was missed by MRA. RAR was comprehensive (bilateral or unilateral to a single-functioning kidney) in 21 of 25 patients and consisted of hepatorenal bypass graft (3 patients), combined aortic and RAR (13 patients), isolated transaortic endarterectomy (8 patients), and aortorenal bypass graft (1 patient). Early improvement in both hypertension control and/or renal function was noted in 21 of 25 patients without operative deaths or postoperative renal failure. Sustained favorable functional results at follow-up, ranging from 5 months to 4 years, were noted in 19 of 25 patients. Conclusion: MRA is an adequate preoperative imaging modality in selected patients before RAIL. This strategy is best applied in circumstances where the clinical presentation suggests hemodynamically significant bilateral RVD and/or in patients at substantial risk of complications from contrast angiography.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1012-1021
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Renal Artery
Angiography
Kidney
Creatinine
Hypertension
Transplants
Endarterectomy
Gadolinium
Pulmonary Edema

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Surgical renal artery reconstruction without contrast arteriography : The role of clinical profiling and magnetic resonance angiography. / Cambria, R. P.; Kaufman, John; Brewster, D. C.; Gertler, J. P.; LaMuraglia, G. M.; Bazari, H.; Abbott, W. M.; Jorgensen, J.; Gusberg, R.; Mannick, J.; Kent, K. C.; Gorin, D.; Logerfo, F.

In: Journal of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 29, No. 6, 1999, p. 1012-1021.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cambria, RP, Kaufman, J, Brewster, DC, Gertler, JP, LaMuraglia, GM, Bazari, H, Abbott, WM, Jorgensen, J, Gusberg, R, Mannick, J, Kent, KC, Gorin, D & Logerfo, F 1999, 'Surgical renal artery reconstruction without contrast arteriography: The role of clinical profiling and magnetic resonance angiography', Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1012-1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(99)70242-9
Cambria, R. P. ; Kaufman, John ; Brewster, D. C. ; Gertler, J. P. ; LaMuraglia, G. M. ; Bazari, H. ; Abbott, W. M. ; Jorgensen, J. ; Gusberg, R. ; Mannick, J. ; Kent, K. C. ; Gorin, D. ; Logerfo, F. / Surgical renal artery reconstruction without contrast arteriography : The role of clinical profiling and magnetic resonance angiography. In: Journal of Vascular Surgery. 1999 ; Vol. 29, No. 6. pp. 1012-1021.
@article{9a40cc006aa047d5b4b1d8ff7de634f6,
title = "Surgical renal artery reconstruction without contrast arteriography: The role of clinical profiling and magnetic resonance angiography",
abstract = "Purpose: Contrast arteriography is the accepted gold standard for diagnosis and treatment planning in patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease (RVD). In this study, the results of a selective policy of surgical renal artery reconstruction (RAR) with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) as the sole preoperative imaging modality are reviewed. Methods: From May 1993 to May 1998, 25 patients underwent RAR after clinical evaluation, and aortic/renal MRA performed with a gadolinium-enhanced and 3- dimensional phase contrast technique. Clinical presentations suggested severe RVD in all patients and included poorly controlled hypertension (16 patients), hospitalization for hypertensive crises and/or acute pulmonary edema (13), and deterioration of renal function within one year of operation (15). Thirteen patients had associated aortic pathologic conditions (12 aneurysms, 1 aortoiliac occlusive disease), and eight of these patients also underwent noncontrast computed tomography scans. Significant renal dysfunction (serum creatinine level, ≥2.0 mg/dL) was present in all but 4 patients with 14 of 25 patients having extreme (creatinine level, ≥3.0 mg/dL) dysfunction. Results: Hemodynamically significant RVD in the main renal artery was verified at operation in 37 of 38 reconstructed main renal arteries (24/25 patients). A single accessory renal artery was missed by MRA. RAR was comprehensive (bilateral or unilateral to a single-functioning kidney) in 21 of 25 patients and consisted of hepatorenal bypass graft (3 patients), combined aortic and RAR (13 patients), isolated transaortic endarterectomy (8 patients), and aortorenal bypass graft (1 patient). Early improvement in both hypertension control and/or renal function was noted in 21 of 25 patients without operative deaths or postoperative renal failure. Sustained favorable functional results at follow-up, ranging from 5 months to 4 years, were noted in 19 of 25 patients. Conclusion: MRA is an adequate preoperative imaging modality in selected patients before RAIL. This strategy is best applied in circumstances where the clinical presentation suggests hemodynamically significant bilateral RVD and/or in patients at substantial risk of complications from contrast angiography.",
author = "Cambria, {R. P.} and John Kaufman and Brewster, {D. C.} and Gertler, {J. P.} and LaMuraglia, {G. M.} and H. Bazari and Abbott, {W. M.} and J. Jorgensen and R. Gusberg and J. Mannick and Kent, {K. C.} and D. Gorin and F. Logerfo",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1016/S0741-5214(99)70242-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "1012--1021",
journal = "Journal of Vascular Surgery",
issn = "0741-5214",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical renal artery reconstruction without contrast arteriography

T2 - The role of clinical profiling and magnetic resonance angiography

AU - Cambria, R. P.

AU - Kaufman, John

AU - Brewster, D. C.

AU - Gertler, J. P.

AU - LaMuraglia, G. M.

AU - Bazari, H.

AU - Abbott, W. M.

AU - Jorgensen, J.

AU - Gusberg, R.

AU - Mannick, J.

AU - Kent, K. C.

AU - Gorin, D.

AU - Logerfo, F.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Purpose: Contrast arteriography is the accepted gold standard for diagnosis and treatment planning in patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease (RVD). In this study, the results of a selective policy of surgical renal artery reconstruction (RAR) with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) as the sole preoperative imaging modality are reviewed. Methods: From May 1993 to May 1998, 25 patients underwent RAR after clinical evaluation, and aortic/renal MRA performed with a gadolinium-enhanced and 3- dimensional phase contrast technique. Clinical presentations suggested severe RVD in all patients and included poorly controlled hypertension (16 patients), hospitalization for hypertensive crises and/or acute pulmonary edema (13), and deterioration of renal function within one year of operation (15). Thirteen patients had associated aortic pathologic conditions (12 aneurysms, 1 aortoiliac occlusive disease), and eight of these patients also underwent noncontrast computed tomography scans. Significant renal dysfunction (serum creatinine level, ≥2.0 mg/dL) was present in all but 4 patients with 14 of 25 patients having extreme (creatinine level, ≥3.0 mg/dL) dysfunction. Results: Hemodynamically significant RVD in the main renal artery was verified at operation in 37 of 38 reconstructed main renal arteries (24/25 patients). A single accessory renal artery was missed by MRA. RAR was comprehensive (bilateral or unilateral to a single-functioning kidney) in 21 of 25 patients and consisted of hepatorenal bypass graft (3 patients), combined aortic and RAR (13 patients), isolated transaortic endarterectomy (8 patients), and aortorenal bypass graft (1 patient). Early improvement in both hypertension control and/or renal function was noted in 21 of 25 patients without operative deaths or postoperative renal failure. Sustained favorable functional results at follow-up, ranging from 5 months to 4 years, were noted in 19 of 25 patients. Conclusion: MRA is an adequate preoperative imaging modality in selected patients before RAIL. This strategy is best applied in circumstances where the clinical presentation suggests hemodynamically significant bilateral RVD and/or in patients at substantial risk of complications from contrast angiography.

AB - Purpose: Contrast arteriography is the accepted gold standard for diagnosis and treatment planning in patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease (RVD). In this study, the results of a selective policy of surgical renal artery reconstruction (RAR) with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) as the sole preoperative imaging modality are reviewed. Methods: From May 1993 to May 1998, 25 patients underwent RAR after clinical evaluation, and aortic/renal MRA performed with a gadolinium-enhanced and 3- dimensional phase contrast technique. Clinical presentations suggested severe RVD in all patients and included poorly controlled hypertension (16 patients), hospitalization for hypertensive crises and/or acute pulmonary edema (13), and deterioration of renal function within one year of operation (15). Thirteen patients had associated aortic pathologic conditions (12 aneurysms, 1 aortoiliac occlusive disease), and eight of these patients also underwent noncontrast computed tomography scans. Significant renal dysfunction (serum creatinine level, ≥2.0 mg/dL) was present in all but 4 patients with 14 of 25 patients having extreme (creatinine level, ≥3.0 mg/dL) dysfunction. Results: Hemodynamically significant RVD in the main renal artery was verified at operation in 37 of 38 reconstructed main renal arteries (24/25 patients). A single accessory renal artery was missed by MRA. RAR was comprehensive (bilateral or unilateral to a single-functioning kidney) in 21 of 25 patients and consisted of hepatorenal bypass graft (3 patients), combined aortic and RAR (13 patients), isolated transaortic endarterectomy (8 patients), and aortorenal bypass graft (1 patient). Early improvement in both hypertension control and/or renal function was noted in 21 of 25 patients without operative deaths or postoperative renal failure. Sustained favorable functional results at follow-up, ranging from 5 months to 4 years, were noted in 19 of 25 patients. Conclusion: MRA is an adequate preoperative imaging modality in selected patients before RAIL. This strategy is best applied in circumstances where the clinical presentation suggests hemodynamically significant bilateral RVD and/or in patients at substantial risk of complications from contrast angiography.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033047852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033047852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0741-5214(99)70242-9

DO - 10.1016/S0741-5214(99)70242-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 10359935

AN - SCOPUS:0033047852

VL - 29

SP - 1012

EP - 1021

JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery

SN - 0741-5214

IS - 6

ER -