Surgery for herniated lumbar discs - A literature synthesis

Richard M. Hoffman, Kimberly J. Wheeler, Richard (Rick) Deyo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

127 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To assess the risks and benefits of surgery for herniated lumbar discs (discectomy) and to evaluate the methodologic quality of the literature. Design: Literature synthesis. Study selection and data analysis: A structured MEDLINE search identified studies of standard, microsurgical, or percutaneous discectomy. Eligible studies had adult subjects, sample sizes of ≥30, clinical outcome data for ≥75% of patients, and follow-up of ≥1 year. Summary rates of successful outcomes, reoperations, and complications were obtained by a random-effects logistic regression model. Methodologic quality was assessed using established study design criteria. Results: Eighty-one studies met inclusion criteria. Most had substantial design flaws and/or omitted important clinical data. Randomized trials of standard discectomy showed better short-term sciatica relief following surgery; 65% to 85% of patients reported no sciatica one year after surgery, compared with only 36% of conservatively treated patients. No data from randomized trials were available for microdiscectomy or percutaneous discectomy, although most outcomes appeared comparable to those of standard discectomy. Approximately 10% of discectomy patients underwent further back surgery, and rates increased over time. The rate of serious complications, including death and permanent neurologic damage, was less than 1%. Conclusions: Most studies were poorly designed and reported. Standard discectomy appears to offer better short-term outcomes than does conservative treatment, but long-term outcomes are similar. Discectomies are relatively safe procedures, though reoperations are common and increase over time. Decisions for elective surgery must balance faster pain relief against the risks and costs of surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)487-496
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume8
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Diskectomy
Intervertebral Disc Displacement
Percutaneous Diskectomy
Sciatica
Reoperation
Logistic Models
MEDLINE
Sample Size
Nervous System
Costs and Cost Analysis
Pain

Keywords

  • herniated lumbar disc
  • literature synthesis
  • microdiscectomy
  • percutaneous discectomy
  • standard discectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Surgery for herniated lumbar discs - A literature synthesis. / Hoffman, Richard M.; Wheeler, Kimberly J.; Deyo, Richard (Rick).

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 8, No. 9, 09.1993, p. 487-496.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hoffman, Richard M. ; Wheeler, Kimberly J. ; Deyo, Richard (Rick). / Surgery for herniated lumbar discs - A literature synthesis. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1993 ; Vol. 8, No. 9. pp. 487-496.
@article{519196d2433645abb8127015b3bd7f14,
title = "Surgery for herniated lumbar discs - A literature synthesis",
abstract = "Objective: To assess the risks and benefits of surgery for herniated lumbar discs (discectomy) and to evaluate the methodologic quality of the literature. Design: Literature synthesis. Study selection and data analysis: A structured MEDLINE search identified studies of standard, microsurgical, or percutaneous discectomy. Eligible studies had adult subjects, sample sizes of ≥30, clinical outcome data for ≥75{\%} of patients, and follow-up of ≥1 year. Summary rates of successful outcomes, reoperations, and complications were obtained by a random-effects logistic regression model. Methodologic quality was assessed using established study design criteria. Results: Eighty-one studies met inclusion criteria. Most had substantial design flaws and/or omitted important clinical data. Randomized trials of standard discectomy showed better short-term sciatica relief following surgery; 65{\%} to 85{\%} of patients reported no sciatica one year after surgery, compared with only 36{\%} of conservatively treated patients. No data from randomized trials were available for microdiscectomy or percutaneous discectomy, although most outcomes appeared comparable to those of standard discectomy. Approximately 10{\%} of discectomy patients underwent further back surgery, and rates increased over time. The rate of serious complications, including death and permanent neurologic damage, was less than 1{\%}. Conclusions: Most studies were poorly designed and reported. Standard discectomy appears to offer better short-term outcomes than does conservative treatment, but long-term outcomes are similar. Discectomies are relatively safe procedures, though reoperations are common and increase over time. Decisions for elective surgery must balance faster pain relief against the risks and costs of surgery.",
keywords = "herniated lumbar disc, literature synthesis, microdiscectomy, percutaneous discectomy, standard discectomy",
author = "Hoffman, {Richard M.} and Wheeler, {Kimberly J.} and Deyo, {Richard (Rick)}",
year = "1993",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/BF02600110",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "487--496",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgery for herniated lumbar discs - A literature synthesis

AU - Hoffman, Richard M.

AU - Wheeler, Kimberly J.

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

PY - 1993/9

Y1 - 1993/9

N2 - Objective: To assess the risks and benefits of surgery for herniated lumbar discs (discectomy) and to evaluate the methodologic quality of the literature. Design: Literature synthesis. Study selection and data analysis: A structured MEDLINE search identified studies of standard, microsurgical, or percutaneous discectomy. Eligible studies had adult subjects, sample sizes of ≥30, clinical outcome data for ≥75% of patients, and follow-up of ≥1 year. Summary rates of successful outcomes, reoperations, and complications were obtained by a random-effects logistic regression model. Methodologic quality was assessed using established study design criteria. Results: Eighty-one studies met inclusion criteria. Most had substantial design flaws and/or omitted important clinical data. Randomized trials of standard discectomy showed better short-term sciatica relief following surgery; 65% to 85% of patients reported no sciatica one year after surgery, compared with only 36% of conservatively treated patients. No data from randomized trials were available for microdiscectomy or percutaneous discectomy, although most outcomes appeared comparable to those of standard discectomy. Approximately 10% of discectomy patients underwent further back surgery, and rates increased over time. The rate of serious complications, including death and permanent neurologic damage, was less than 1%. Conclusions: Most studies were poorly designed and reported. Standard discectomy appears to offer better short-term outcomes than does conservative treatment, but long-term outcomes are similar. Discectomies are relatively safe procedures, though reoperations are common and increase over time. Decisions for elective surgery must balance faster pain relief against the risks and costs of surgery.

AB - Objective: To assess the risks and benefits of surgery for herniated lumbar discs (discectomy) and to evaluate the methodologic quality of the literature. Design: Literature synthesis. Study selection and data analysis: A structured MEDLINE search identified studies of standard, microsurgical, or percutaneous discectomy. Eligible studies had adult subjects, sample sizes of ≥30, clinical outcome data for ≥75% of patients, and follow-up of ≥1 year. Summary rates of successful outcomes, reoperations, and complications were obtained by a random-effects logistic regression model. Methodologic quality was assessed using established study design criteria. Results: Eighty-one studies met inclusion criteria. Most had substantial design flaws and/or omitted important clinical data. Randomized trials of standard discectomy showed better short-term sciatica relief following surgery; 65% to 85% of patients reported no sciatica one year after surgery, compared with only 36% of conservatively treated patients. No data from randomized trials were available for microdiscectomy or percutaneous discectomy, although most outcomes appeared comparable to those of standard discectomy. Approximately 10% of discectomy patients underwent further back surgery, and rates increased over time. The rate of serious complications, including death and permanent neurologic damage, was less than 1%. Conclusions: Most studies were poorly designed and reported. Standard discectomy appears to offer better short-term outcomes than does conservative treatment, but long-term outcomes are similar. Discectomies are relatively safe procedures, though reoperations are common and increase over time. Decisions for elective surgery must balance faster pain relief against the risks and costs of surgery.

KW - herniated lumbar disc

KW - literature synthesis

KW - microdiscectomy

KW - percutaneous discectomy

KW - standard discectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027182250&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027182250&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02600110

DO - 10.1007/BF02600110

M3 - Article

C2 - 8410420

AN - SCOPUS:0027182250

VL - 8

SP - 487

EP - 496

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 9

ER -