Surgeons expect patients to buy-in to postoperative life support preoperatively: Results of a national survey

Margaret L. Schwarze, Andrew J. Redmann, G. Caleb Alexander, Karen Brasel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:: Evidence suggests that surgeons implicitly negotiate with their patients preoperatively about the use of life supporting treatments postoperatively as a condition for performing surgery. We sought to examine whether this surgical buy-in behavior is present among a large, nationally representative sample of surgeons who routinely perform high-risk operations. DESIGN:: Using findings from a qualitative study, we designed a survey to determine the prevalence of surgical buy-in and its consequences. Respondents were asked to consider their response to a patient at moderate risk for prolonged mechanical ventilation or dialysis who has a preoperative request to limit postoperative life-supporting treatment. We used bivariate and multivariate analysis to identify surgeon characteristics associated with 1) preoperatively creating an informal contract with the patient defining agreed upon limitations of postoperative life support and 2) declining to operate on such patients. SETTING AND SUBJECTS:: U.S. mail-based survey of 2,100 cardiothoracic, vascular, and neurosurgeons. INTERVENTIONS:: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:: The adjusted response rate was 56%. Nearly two thirds of respondents (62%) reported they would create an informal contract with the patient describing agreed upon limitations of aggressive therapy and a similar number (60%) endorsed sometimes or always refusing to operate on a patient with preferences to limit life support. After adjusting for potentially confounding covariates, the odds of preoperatively contracting about life-supporting treatment were more than two-fold greater among surgeons who felt it was acceptable to withdraw life support on postoperative day 14 compared with those who believed it was not acceptable to withdraw life support on postoperative day 14 (odds ratio 2.1, 95% confidence intervals 1.3-3.2). CONCLUSIONS:: Many surgeons will report contracting informally with patients preoperatively about the use of postoperative life support. Recognition of this process and its limitations may help to inform postoperative decision making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalCritical Care Medicine
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Contracts
Surgeons
Surveys and Questionnaires
Patient Preference
Postal Service
Therapeutics
Artificial Respiration
Blood Vessels
Dialysis
Decision Making
Multivariate Analysis
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Recognition (Psychology)
Neurosurgeons

Keywords

  • decision making
  • ethics
  • informed consent
  • patient autonomy
  • surgical outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Surgeons expect patients to buy-in to postoperative life support preoperatively : Results of a national survey. / Schwarze, Margaret L.; Redmann, Andrew J.; Alexander, G. Caleb; Brasel, Karen.

In: Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 41, No. 1, 01.2013, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schwarze, Margaret L. ; Redmann, Andrew J. ; Alexander, G. Caleb ; Brasel, Karen. / Surgeons expect patients to buy-in to postoperative life support preoperatively : Results of a national survey. In: Critical Care Medicine. 2013 ; Vol. 41, No. 1. pp. 1-8.
@article{df507f5eba9246d1a7d25a8571f459ff,
title = "Surgeons expect patients to buy-in to postoperative life support preoperatively: Results of a national survey",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE:: Evidence suggests that surgeons implicitly negotiate with their patients preoperatively about the use of life supporting treatments postoperatively as a condition for performing surgery. We sought to examine whether this surgical buy-in behavior is present among a large, nationally representative sample of surgeons who routinely perform high-risk operations. DESIGN:: Using findings from a qualitative study, we designed a survey to determine the prevalence of surgical buy-in and its consequences. Respondents were asked to consider their response to a patient at moderate risk for prolonged mechanical ventilation or dialysis who has a preoperative request to limit postoperative life-supporting treatment. We used bivariate and multivariate analysis to identify surgeon characteristics associated with 1) preoperatively creating an informal contract with the patient defining agreed upon limitations of postoperative life support and 2) declining to operate on such patients. SETTING AND SUBJECTS:: U.S. mail-based survey of 2,100 cardiothoracic, vascular, and neurosurgeons. INTERVENTIONS:: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:: The adjusted response rate was 56{\%}. Nearly two thirds of respondents (62{\%}) reported they would create an informal contract with the patient describing agreed upon limitations of aggressive therapy and a similar number (60{\%}) endorsed sometimes or always refusing to operate on a patient with preferences to limit life support. After adjusting for potentially confounding covariates, the odds of preoperatively contracting about life-supporting treatment were more than two-fold greater among surgeons who felt it was acceptable to withdraw life support on postoperative day 14 compared with those who believed it was not acceptable to withdraw life support on postoperative day 14 (odds ratio 2.1, 95{\%} confidence intervals 1.3-3.2). CONCLUSIONS:: Many surgeons will report contracting informally with patients preoperatively about the use of postoperative life support. Recognition of this process and its limitations may help to inform postoperative decision making.",
keywords = "decision making, ethics, informed consent, patient autonomy, surgical outcomes",
author = "Schwarze, {Margaret L.} and Redmann, {Andrew J.} and Alexander, {G. Caleb} and Karen Brasel",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1097/CCM.0b013e31826a4650",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgeons expect patients to buy-in to postoperative life support preoperatively

T2 - Results of a national survey

AU - Schwarze, Margaret L.

AU - Redmann, Andrew J.

AU - Alexander, G. Caleb

AU - Brasel, Karen

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE:: Evidence suggests that surgeons implicitly negotiate with their patients preoperatively about the use of life supporting treatments postoperatively as a condition for performing surgery. We sought to examine whether this surgical buy-in behavior is present among a large, nationally representative sample of surgeons who routinely perform high-risk operations. DESIGN:: Using findings from a qualitative study, we designed a survey to determine the prevalence of surgical buy-in and its consequences. Respondents were asked to consider their response to a patient at moderate risk for prolonged mechanical ventilation or dialysis who has a preoperative request to limit postoperative life-supporting treatment. We used bivariate and multivariate analysis to identify surgeon characteristics associated with 1) preoperatively creating an informal contract with the patient defining agreed upon limitations of postoperative life support and 2) declining to operate on such patients. SETTING AND SUBJECTS:: U.S. mail-based survey of 2,100 cardiothoracic, vascular, and neurosurgeons. INTERVENTIONS:: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:: The adjusted response rate was 56%. Nearly two thirds of respondents (62%) reported they would create an informal contract with the patient describing agreed upon limitations of aggressive therapy and a similar number (60%) endorsed sometimes or always refusing to operate on a patient with preferences to limit life support. After adjusting for potentially confounding covariates, the odds of preoperatively contracting about life-supporting treatment were more than two-fold greater among surgeons who felt it was acceptable to withdraw life support on postoperative day 14 compared with those who believed it was not acceptable to withdraw life support on postoperative day 14 (odds ratio 2.1, 95% confidence intervals 1.3-3.2). CONCLUSIONS:: Many surgeons will report contracting informally with patients preoperatively about the use of postoperative life support. Recognition of this process and its limitations may help to inform postoperative decision making.

AB - OBJECTIVE:: Evidence suggests that surgeons implicitly negotiate with their patients preoperatively about the use of life supporting treatments postoperatively as a condition for performing surgery. We sought to examine whether this surgical buy-in behavior is present among a large, nationally representative sample of surgeons who routinely perform high-risk operations. DESIGN:: Using findings from a qualitative study, we designed a survey to determine the prevalence of surgical buy-in and its consequences. Respondents were asked to consider their response to a patient at moderate risk for prolonged mechanical ventilation or dialysis who has a preoperative request to limit postoperative life-supporting treatment. We used bivariate and multivariate analysis to identify surgeon characteristics associated with 1) preoperatively creating an informal contract with the patient defining agreed upon limitations of postoperative life support and 2) declining to operate on such patients. SETTING AND SUBJECTS:: U.S. mail-based survey of 2,100 cardiothoracic, vascular, and neurosurgeons. INTERVENTIONS:: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:: The adjusted response rate was 56%. Nearly two thirds of respondents (62%) reported they would create an informal contract with the patient describing agreed upon limitations of aggressive therapy and a similar number (60%) endorsed sometimes or always refusing to operate on a patient with preferences to limit life support. After adjusting for potentially confounding covariates, the odds of preoperatively contracting about life-supporting treatment were more than two-fold greater among surgeons who felt it was acceptable to withdraw life support on postoperative day 14 compared with those who believed it was not acceptable to withdraw life support on postoperative day 14 (odds ratio 2.1, 95% confidence intervals 1.3-3.2). CONCLUSIONS:: Many surgeons will report contracting informally with patients preoperatively about the use of postoperative life support. Recognition of this process and its limitations may help to inform postoperative decision making.

KW - decision making

KW - ethics

KW - informed consent

KW - patient autonomy

KW - surgical outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872059819&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872059819&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31826a4650

DO - 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31826a4650

M3 - Article

C2 - 23222269

AN - SCOPUS:84872059819

VL - 41

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 0090-3493

IS - 1

ER -