SU‐E‐T‐727: Evaluation of Eclipse AAA Dose Calculation Accuracy in the Presence of a Titanium Spinal Fixation Device

T. he, Wolfram Laub, S. Pillai, B. Ragel, C. Kubicky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether the Eclipse's AAA algorithm can accurately predict doses in the presence of hardware. Methods: A titanium spinal fixation device was attached to a spine model to mimic its spatial orientation in patient. The model was immobilized to a plastic plate to form a rigid device. Posterior spine irradiation was simulated by positioning the device inside a PTW water tank with 270 degree gantry irradiation. Absolute doses and relative dose distributions were measured using ion chamber and OSLD. Lateral spine irradiation was simulated by placing the device in a water tank with 0 degree gantry irradiation. Planar doses were measured using a SunNuclear MapCheck device for 6 MV open and intensity‐modulated beams. Above experiement setups were reproduced in Eclipse from CT images with correct electron densities assigned to materials used in the experiments, e.g. electron density 4.0 for the titanium device. Doses were calculated using AAA 8.9 algorithm and compared with measurements. Results: In posterior spine irradiation, doses were measured respectively for 7×10 and 10×15 cm open fields. Measured dose outputs agreed with calculations within 2.5% at all selected locations along the spinal canal and under the titanium cage. Excellent agreements (< 1%) on relative depth doses along beam axis were observed. Dose profiles at depths below the device generally agreed with calculations within 3%, although discrepancies in some regions were as large as 5%. Eclipse's AAA algorithm seems to predict doses well in the regions shadowed by the titanium material while under‐estimate doses in adjacent regions outside the shadows. In lateral spine irradiation, the 3mm/3% gamma analysis demonstrated > 98% agreements between the measured and the calculated planar doses for all tested open and intensity‐modulated fields. Conclusions: Eclipse's AAA 8.9 algorithm can reasonably accurately predict doses in the spine region in the presence of a titanium spinal fixation device.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3658
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume38
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Titanium
Equipment and Supplies
Spine
Electrons
Spinal Canal
Water
Plastics
Ions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐E‐T‐727 : Evaluation of Eclipse AAA Dose Calculation Accuracy in the Presence of a Titanium Spinal Fixation Device. / he, T.; Laub, Wolfram; Pillai, S.; Ragel, B.; Kubicky, C.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 38, No. 6, 2011, p. 3658.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

he, T. ; Laub, Wolfram ; Pillai, S. ; Ragel, B. ; Kubicky, C. / SU‐E‐T‐727 : Evaluation of Eclipse AAA Dose Calculation Accuracy in the Presence of a Titanium Spinal Fixation Device. In: Medical Physics. 2011 ; Vol. 38, No. 6. pp. 3658.
@article{657429d9549544d4bd69facc348924d9,
title = "SU‐E‐T‐727: Evaluation of Eclipse AAA Dose Calculation Accuracy in the Presence of a Titanium Spinal Fixation Device",
abstract = "Purpose: To determine whether the Eclipse's AAA algorithm can accurately predict doses in the presence of hardware. Methods: A titanium spinal fixation device was attached to a spine model to mimic its spatial orientation in patient. The model was immobilized to a plastic plate to form a rigid device. Posterior spine irradiation was simulated by positioning the device inside a PTW water tank with 270 degree gantry irradiation. Absolute doses and relative dose distributions were measured using ion chamber and OSLD. Lateral spine irradiation was simulated by placing the device in a water tank with 0 degree gantry irradiation. Planar doses were measured using a SunNuclear MapCheck device for 6 MV open and intensity‐modulated beams. Above experiement setups were reproduced in Eclipse from CT images with correct electron densities assigned to materials used in the experiments, e.g. electron density 4.0 for the titanium device. Doses were calculated using AAA 8.9 algorithm and compared with measurements. Results: In posterior spine irradiation, doses were measured respectively for 7×10 and 10×15 cm open fields. Measured dose outputs agreed with calculations within 2.5{\%} at all selected locations along the spinal canal and under the titanium cage. Excellent agreements (< 1{\%}) on relative depth doses along beam axis were observed. Dose profiles at depths below the device generally agreed with calculations within 3{\%}, although discrepancies in some regions were as large as 5{\%}. Eclipse's AAA algorithm seems to predict doses well in the regions shadowed by the titanium material while under‐estimate doses in adjacent regions outside the shadows. In lateral spine irradiation, the 3mm/3{\%} gamma analysis demonstrated > 98{\%} agreements between the measured and the calculated planar doses for all tested open and intensity‐modulated fields. Conclusions: Eclipse's AAA 8.9 algorithm can reasonably accurately predict doses in the spine region in the presence of a titanium spinal fixation device.",
author = "T. he and Wolfram Laub and S. Pillai and B. Ragel and C. Kubicky",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1118/1.3612689",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "3658",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐E‐T‐727

T2 - Evaluation of Eclipse AAA Dose Calculation Accuracy in the Presence of a Titanium Spinal Fixation Device

AU - he, T.

AU - Laub, Wolfram

AU - Pillai, S.

AU - Ragel, B.

AU - Kubicky, C.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Purpose: To determine whether the Eclipse's AAA algorithm can accurately predict doses in the presence of hardware. Methods: A titanium spinal fixation device was attached to a spine model to mimic its spatial orientation in patient. The model was immobilized to a plastic plate to form a rigid device. Posterior spine irradiation was simulated by positioning the device inside a PTW water tank with 270 degree gantry irradiation. Absolute doses and relative dose distributions were measured using ion chamber and OSLD. Lateral spine irradiation was simulated by placing the device in a water tank with 0 degree gantry irradiation. Planar doses were measured using a SunNuclear MapCheck device for 6 MV open and intensity‐modulated beams. Above experiement setups were reproduced in Eclipse from CT images with correct electron densities assigned to materials used in the experiments, e.g. electron density 4.0 for the titanium device. Doses were calculated using AAA 8.9 algorithm and compared with measurements. Results: In posterior spine irradiation, doses were measured respectively for 7×10 and 10×15 cm open fields. Measured dose outputs agreed with calculations within 2.5% at all selected locations along the spinal canal and under the titanium cage. Excellent agreements (< 1%) on relative depth doses along beam axis were observed. Dose profiles at depths below the device generally agreed with calculations within 3%, although discrepancies in some regions were as large as 5%. Eclipse's AAA algorithm seems to predict doses well in the regions shadowed by the titanium material while under‐estimate doses in adjacent regions outside the shadows. In lateral spine irradiation, the 3mm/3% gamma analysis demonstrated > 98% agreements between the measured and the calculated planar doses for all tested open and intensity‐modulated fields. Conclusions: Eclipse's AAA 8.9 algorithm can reasonably accurately predict doses in the spine region in the presence of a titanium spinal fixation device.

AB - Purpose: To determine whether the Eclipse's AAA algorithm can accurately predict doses in the presence of hardware. Methods: A titanium spinal fixation device was attached to a spine model to mimic its spatial orientation in patient. The model was immobilized to a plastic plate to form a rigid device. Posterior spine irradiation was simulated by positioning the device inside a PTW water tank with 270 degree gantry irradiation. Absolute doses and relative dose distributions were measured using ion chamber and OSLD. Lateral spine irradiation was simulated by placing the device in a water tank with 0 degree gantry irradiation. Planar doses were measured using a SunNuclear MapCheck device for 6 MV open and intensity‐modulated beams. Above experiement setups were reproduced in Eclipse from CT images with correct electron densities assigned to materials used in the experiments, e.g. electron density 4.0 for the titanium device. Doses were calculated using AAA 8.9 algorithm and compared with measurements. Results: In posterior spine irradiation, doses were measured respectively for 7×10 and 10×15 cm open fields. Measured dose outputs agreed with calculations within 2.5% at all selected locations along the spinal canal and under the titanium cage. Excellent agreements (< 1%) on relative depth doses along beam axis were observed. Dose profiles at depths below the device generally agreed with calculations within 3%, although discrepancies in some regions were as large as 5%. Eclipse's AAA algorithm seems to predict doses well in the regions shadowed by the titanium material while under‐estimate doses in adjacent regions outside the shadows. In lateral spine irradiation, the 3mm/3% gamma analysis demonstrated > 98% agreements between the measured and the calculated planar doses for all tested open and intensity‐modulated fields. Conclusions: Eclipse's AAA 8.9 algorithm can reasonably accurately predict doses in the spine region in the presence of a titanium spinal fixation device.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024814764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024814764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3612689

DO - 10.1118/1.3612689

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024814764

VL - 38

SP - 3658

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -