Subregion-specific differences in hippocampal activity between Delay and Trace fear conditioning: An immunohistochemical analysis

Adam Z. Weitemier, Andrey Ryabinin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lesions of the hippocampus attenuate acquisition of the tone-shock contingency in Trace, but not in Delay fear conditioning. These findings suggest that hippocampal regions are differentially involved in these two forms of fear conditioning. The present study was aimed at testing the hypothesis that hippocampal neurons are differentially activated during acquisition and retrieval of Delay versus Trace fear conditioning. Male C57BL/6J mice were exposed to eight tone-shock pairings (in Trace conditioning the shock came 30 s after the tone), and tested for immobility upon reexposure to contextual stimuli or to one tone presentation. Ten brain regions were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for inducible transcription factors (ITF) c-Fos and Zif268 1.5 h after training, context test or tone test. Acquisition of both Delay and Trace fear conditioning produced significant induction of c-Fos in the majority of brain regions analyzed compared to naive control animals. Importantly, Delay fear conditioning caused a higher increase of c-Fos expression in the CA3 region of the hippocampus compared to Trace-trained animals. After cue reexposure, Zif268 levels in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus were higher in Trace-conditioned than in Delay-conditioned animals. In addition, reexposure-related c-Fos expression in the anterior cingulate cortex was significantly higher in Delay-conditioned animals than in Trace-conditioned animals. The present study confirms differential activation of hippocampal subregions in Delay and Trace fear conditioning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-65
Number of pages11
JournalBrain Research
Volume995
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2004

Fingerprint

Fear
Shock
Hippocampus
Parahippocampal Gyrus
Gyrus Cinguli
Dentate Gyrus
Brain
Conditioning (Psychology)
Inbred C57BL Mouse
Cues
Transcription Factors
Immunohistochemistry
Neurons

Keywords

  • Anterior cingulate cortex
  • c-Fos
  • Hippocampus
  • Memory retrieval
  • Trace fear conditioning
  • Zif268

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Subregion-specific differences in hippocampal activity between Delay and Trace fear conditioning : An immunohistochemical analysis. / Weitemier, Adam Z.; Ryabinin, Andrey.

In: Brain Research, Vol. 995, No. 1, 02.01.2004, p. 55-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2a1df368da7f4f5b8bbbcd0cc0e244ce,
title = "Subregion-specific differences in hippocampal activity between Delay and Trace fear conditioning: An immunohistochemical analysis",
abstract = "Lesions of the hippocampus attenuate acquisition of the tone-shock contingency in Trace, but not in Delay fear conditioning. These findings suggest that hippocampal regions are differentially involved in these two forms of fear conditioning. The present study was aimed at testing the hypothesis that hippocampal neurons are differentially activated during acquisition and retrieval of Delay versus Trace fear conditioning. Male C57BL/6J mice were exposed to eight tone-shock pairings (in Trace conditioning the shock came 30 s after the tone), and tested for immobility upon reexposure to contextual stimuli or to one tone presentation. Ten brain regions were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for inducible transcription factors (ITF) c-Fos and Zif268 1.5 h after training, context test or tone test. Acquisition of both Delay and Trace fear conditioning produced significant induction of c-Fos in the majority of brain regions analyzed compared to naive control animals. Importantly, Delay fear conditioning caused a higher increase of c-Fos expression in the CA3 region of the hippocampus compared to Trace-trained animals. After cue reexposure, Zif268 levels in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus were higher in Trace-conditioned than in Delay-conditioned animals. In addition, reexposure-related c-Fos expression in the anterior cingulate cortex was significantly higher in Delay-conditioned animals than in Trace-conditioned animals. The present study confirms differential activation of hippocampal subregions in Delay and Trace fear conditioning.",
keywords = "Anterior cingulate cortex, c-Fos, Hippocampus, Memory retrieval, Trace fear conditioning, Zif268",
author = "Weitemier, {Adam Z.} and Andrey Ryabinin",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.brainres.2003.09.054",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "995",
pages = "55--65",
journal = "Brain Research",
issn = "0006-8993",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subregion-specific differences in hippocampal activity between Delay and Trace fear conditioning

T2 - An immunohistochemical analysis

AU - Weitemier, Adam Z.

AU - Ryabinin, Andrey

PY - 2004/1/2

Y1 - 2004/1/2

N2 - Lesions of the hippocampus attenuate acquisition of the tone-shock contingency in Trace, but not in Delay fear conditioning. These findings suggest that hippocampal regions are differentially involved in these two forms of fear conditioning. The present study was aimed at testing the hypothesis that hippocampal neurons are differentially activated during acquisition and retrieval of Delay versus Trace fear conditioning. Male C57BL/6J mice were exposed to eight tone-shock pairings (in Trace conditioning the shock came 30 s after the tone), and tested for immobility upon reexposure to contextual stimuli or to one tone presentation. Ten brain regions were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for inducible transcription factors (ITF) c-Fos and Zif268 1.5 h after training, context test or tone test. Acquisition of both Delay and Trace fear conditioning produced significant induction of c-Fos in the majority of brain regions analyzed compared to naive control animals. Importantly, Delay fear conditioning caused a higher increase of c-Fos expression in the CA3 region of the hippocampus compared to Trace-trained animals. After cue reexposure, Zif268 levels in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus were higher in Trace-conditioned than in Delay-conditioned animals. In addition, reexposure-related c-Fos expression in the anterior cingulate cortex was significantly higher in Delay-conditioned animals than in Trace-conditioned animals. The present study confirms differential activation of hippocampal subregions in Delay and Trace fear conditioning.

AB - Lesions of the hippocampus attenuate acquisition of the tone-shock contingency in Trace, but not in Delay fear conditioning. These findings suggest that hippocampal regions are differentially involved in these two forms of fear conditioning. The present study was aimed at testing the hypothesis that hippocampal neurons are differentially activated during acquisition and retrieval of Delay versus Trace fear conditioning. Male C57BL/6J mice were exposed to eight tone-shock pairings (in Trace conditioning the shock came 30 s after the tone), and tested for immobility upon reexposure to contextual stimuli or to one tone presentation. Ten brain regions were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for inducible transcription factors (ITF) c-Fos and Zif268 1.5 h after training, context test or tone test. Acquisition of both Delay and Trace fear conditioning produced significant induction of c-Fos in the majority of brain regions analyzed compared to naive control animals. Importantly, Delay fear conditioning caused a higher increase of c-Fos expression in the CA3 region of the hippocampus compared to Trace-trained animals. After cue reexposure, Zif268 levels in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus were higher in Trace-conditioned than in Delay-conditioned animals. In addition, reexposure-related c-Fos expression in the anterior cingulate cortex was significantly higher in Delay-conditioned animals than in Trace-conditioned animals. The present study confirms differential activation of hippocampal subregions in Delay and Trace fear conditioning.

KW - Anterior cingulate cortex

KW - c-Fos

KW - Hippocampus

KW - Memory retrieval

KW - Trace fear conditioning

KW - Zif268

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344440798&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0344440798&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.brainres.2003.09.054

DO - 10.1016/j.brainres.2003.09.054

M3 - Article

C2 - 14644471

AN - SCOPUS:0344440798

VL - 995

SP - 55

EP - 65

JO - Brain Research

JF - Brain Research

SN - 0006-8993

IS - 1

ER -