Statewide study of diagnostic agreement in breast pathology

Wendy A. Wells, Patricia (Patty) Carney, M. Scottie Eliassen, Anna N. Tosteson, E. Robert Greenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This study assessed the degree of diagnostic agreement among community-based general pathologists reading slides of representative breast tissue specimens and tested whether diagnostic variability is associated with type of breast specimen (e.g., core needle or excisional biopsy) or slide quality. Methods: Twenty-six of the 44 eligible pathologists working at community-based pathology practices in New Hampshire participated. Each pathologist evaluated slides of breast tissue obtained from 30 case subjects randomly selected from a statewide breast pathology database. The diagnostic categories used were benign, benign with atypia, noninvasive malignant, and invasive malignant. The levels of agreement (i.e., kappa coefficients) for the diagnoses were assessed. Results: Agreement was high among pathologists for assignment of diagnostic category (kappa coefficient = 0.71) and was nearly perfect for their selection of benign versus malignant categories (kappa coefficient = 0.95). There was less agreement for the categories of noninvasive malignant and benign with atypia (kappa coefficients of 0.59 and 0.22, respectively). There was no apparent relationship between levels of diagnostic agreement and specimen type or perceived slide quality. Conclusions: Diagnostic agreement for breast tissue specimens is high overall among community-based pathologists, but clinically relevant disagreements may occur in the assessment of noninvasive malignant diagnoses. The establishment of reread policies for certain diagnostic categories may reduce the possibility that diagnostic misclassification will lead to overtreatment or undertreatment. The high degree of diagnostic reproducibility for invasive cancerous lesions of the breast suggests that it is unnecessary for a central review of these lesions in national cancer trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)142-145
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the National Cancer Institute
Volume90
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jan 21 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Breast
Pathology
Needles
Reading
Pathologists
Databases
Biopsy
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Wells, W. A., Carney, P. P., Eliassen, M. S., Tosteson, A. N., & Greenberg, E. R. (1998). Statewide study of diagnostic agreement in breast pathology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 90(2), 142-145.

Statewide study of diagnostic agreement in breast pathology. / Wells, Wendy A.; Carney, Patricia (Patty); Eliassen, M. Scottie; Tosteson, Anna N.; Greenberg, E. Robert.

In: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 90, No. 2, 21.01.1998, p. 142-145.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wells, WA, Carney, PP, Eliassen, MS, Tosteson, AN & Greenberg, ER 1998, 'Statewide study of diagnostic agreement in breast pathology', Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 142-145.
Wells WA, Carney PP, Eliassen MS, Tosteson AN, Greenberg ER. Statewide study of diagnostic agreement in breast pathology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1998 Jan 21;90(2):142-145.
Wells, Wendy A. ; Carney, Patricia (Patty) ; Eliassen, M. Scottie ; Tosteson, Anna N. ; Greenberg, E. Robert. / Statewide study of diagnostic agreement in breast pathology. In: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1998 ; Vol. 90, No. 2. pp. 142-145.
@article{68c760b2e5aa45ccab3d82f658f1eb3e,
title = "Statewide study of diagnostic agreement in breast pathology",
abstract = "Background: This study assessed the degree of diagnostic agreement among community-based general pathologists reading slides of representative breast tissue specimens and tested whether diagnostic variability is associated with type of breast specimen (e.g., core needle or excisional biopsy) or slide quality. Methods: Twenty-six of the 44 eligible pathologists working at community-based pathology practices in New Hampshire participated. Each pathologist evaluated slides of breast tissue obtained from 30 case subjects randomly selected from a statewide breast pathology database. The diagnostic categories used were benign, benign with atypia, noninvasive malignant, and invasive malignant. The levels of agreement (i.e., kappa coefficients) for the diagnoses were assessed. Results: Agreement was high among pathologists for assignment of diagnostic category (kappa coefficient = 0.71) and was nearly perfect for their selection of benign versus malignant categories (kappa coefficient = 0.95). There was less agreement for the categories of noninvasive malignant and benign with atypia (kappa coefficients of 0.59 and 0.22, respectively). There was no apparent relationship between levels of diagnostic agreement and specimen type or perceived slide quality. Conclusions: Diagnostic agreement for breast tissue specimens is high overall among community-based pathologists, but clinically relevant disagreements may occur in the assessment of noninvasive malignant diagnoses. The establishment of reread policies for certain diagnostic categories may reduce the possibility that diagnostic misclassification will lead to overtreatment or undertreatment. The high degree of diagnostic reproducibility for invasive cancerous lesions of the breast suggests that it is unnecessary for a central review of these lesions in national cancer trials.",
author = "Wells, {Wendy A.} and Carney, {Patricia (Patty)} and Eliassen, {M. Scottie} and Tosteson, {Anna N.} and Greenberg, {E. Robert}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "21",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "142--145",
journal = "Journal of the National Cancer Institute",
issn = "0027-8874",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Statewide study of diagnostic agreement in breast pathology

AU - Wells, Wendy A.

AU - Carney, Patricia (Patty)

AU - Eliassen, M. Scottie

AU - Tosteson, Anna N.

AU - Greenberg, E. Robert

PY - 1998/1/21

Y1 - 1998/1/21

N2 - Background: This study assessed the degree of diagnostic agreement among community-based general pathologists reading slides of representative breast tissue specimens and tested whether diagnostic variability is associated with type of breast specimen (e.g., core needle or excisional biopsy) or slide quality. Methods: Twenty-six of the 44 eligible pathologists working at community-based pathology practices in New Hampshire participated. Each pathologist evaluated slides of breast tissue obtained from 30 case subjects randomly selected from a statewide breast pathology database. The diagnostic categories used were benign, benign with atypia, noninvasive malignant, and invasive malignant. The levels of agreement (i.e., kappa coefficients) for the diagnoses were assessed. Results: Agreement was high among pathologists for assignment of diagnostic category (kappa coefficient = 0.71) and was nearly perfect for their selection of benign versus malignant categories (kappa coefficient = 0.95). There was less agreement for the categories of noninvasive malignant and benign with atypia (kappa coefficients of 0.59 and 0.22, respectively). There was no apparent relationship between levels of diagnostic agreement and specimen type or perceived slide quality. Conclusions: Diagnostic agreement for breast tissue specimens is high overall among community-based pathologists, but clinically relevant disagreements may occur in the assessment of noninvasive malignant diagnoses. The establishment of reread policies for certain diagnostic categories may reduce the possibility that diagnostic misclassification will lead to overtreatment or undertreatment. The high degree of diagnostic reproducibility for invasive cancerous lesions of the breast suggests that it is unnecessary for a central review of these lesions in national cancer trials.

AB - Background: This study assessed the degree of diagnostic agreement among community-based general pathologists reading slides of representative breast tissue specimens and tested whether diagnostic variability is associated with type of breast specimen (e.g., core needle or excisional biopsy) or slide quality. Methods: Twenty-six of the 44 eligible pathologists working at community-based pathology practices in New Hampshire participated. Each pathologist evaluated slides of breast tissue obtained from 30 case subjects randomly selected from a statewide breast pathology database. The diagnostic categories used were benign, benign with atypia, noninvasive malignant, and invasive malignant. The levels of agreement (i.e., kappa coefficients) for the diagnoses were assessed. Results: Agreement was high among pathologists for assignment of diagnostic category (kappa coefficient = 0.71) and was nearly perfect for their selection of benign versus malignant categories (kappa coefficient = 0.95). There was less agreement for the categories of noninvasive malignant and benign with atypia (kappa coefficients of 0.59 and 0.22, respectively). There was no apparent relationship between levels of diagnostic agreement and specimen type or perceived slide quality. Conclusions: Diagnostic agreement for breast tissue specimens is high overall among community-based pathologists, but clinically relevant disagreements may occur in the assessment of noninvasive malignant diagnoses. The establishment of reread policies for certain diagnostic categories may reduce the possibility that diagnostic misclassification will lead to overtreatment or undertreatment. The high degree of diagnostic reproducibility for invasive cancerous lesions of the breast suggests that it is unnecessary for a central review of these lesions in national cancer trials.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032554090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032554090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9450574

AN - SCOPUS:0032554090

VL - 90

SP - 142

EP - 145

JO - Journal of the National Cancer Institute

JF - Journal of the National Cancer Institute

SN - 0027-8874

IS - 2

ER -