Statewide and Large-scale Simulation Implementation. The Work of Many

Michael Seropian, Bonnie Driggers

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Creating a simulation facility in a single institution is not a simple feat. The political, logistical, and fiscal issues often mire a project down. Now, magnify that to not just one institution, but an entire state. The need for simulation-based education is widespread. However, it is the need for infrastructure and operational expertise that far outstrips the supply of money or manufactured simulation devices. The statewide approach is not magical, but is just a means to an end. It is a method that will be applicable to some states but not others. It is a model that can be used locally or nationally-the concepts are remarkably similar, just the scope differs. However, the larger the scale, the greater the consequences and implications. It is commonly accepted that a functional team will outperform a single individual. The notion of a statewide implementation can take various forms, which may include a centralized governing structure. This is not absolute, and in fact may not be desirable. Models could include a body that acts as a resource to develop the infrastructure skill set required for maximal access to simulation in the state. There are a number of core elements that are critical to implementing clinical simulation at any scale: interested parties getting together; a common consensus and the need to develop a common goal; a more formal group is formed to act on the need and to develop a mechanism to meet the need and goal(s); and so on.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationClinical Simulation
PublisherElsevier Inc.
Pages355-358
Number of pages4
ISBN (Print)9780123725318
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Statewide and Large-scale Simulation Implementation. The Work of Many. / Seropian, Michael; Driggers, Bonnie.

Clinical Simulation. Elsevier Inc., 2008. p. 355-358.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Seropian, Michael ; Driggers, Bonnie. / Statewide and Large-scale Simulation Implementation. The Work of Many. Clinical Simulation. Elsevier Inc., 2008. pp. 355-358
@inbook{6b6f92bc35eb4e309ad2713697da3cc7,
title = "Statewide and Large-scale Simulation Implementation. The Work of Many",
abstract = "Creating a simulation facility in a single institution is not a simple feat. The political, logistical, and fiscal issues often mire a project down. Now, magnify that to not just one institution, but an entire state. The need for simulation-based education is widespread. However, it is the need for infrastructure and operational expertise that far outstrips the supply of money or manufactured simulation devices. The statewide approach is not magical, but is just a means to an end. It is a method that will be applicable to some states but not others. It is a model that can be used locally or nationally-the concepts are remarkably similar, just the scope differs. However, the larger the scale, the greater the consequences and implications. It is commonly accepted that a functional team will outperform a single individual. The notion of a statewide implementation can take various forms, which may include a centralized governing structure. This is not absolute, and in fact may not be desirable. Models could include a body that acts as a resource to develop the infrastructure skill set required for maximal access to simulation in the state. There are a number of core elements that are critical to implementing clinical simulation at any scale: interested parties getting together; a common consensus and the need to develop a common goal; a more formal group is formed to act on the need and to develop a mechanism to meet the need and goal(s); and so on.",
author = "Michael Seropian and Bonnie Driggers",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1016/B978-012372531-8.50057-1",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780123725318",
pages = "355--358",
booktitle = "Clinical Simulation",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Statewide and Large-scale Simulation Implementation. The Work of Many

AU - Seropian, Michael

AU - Driggers, Bonnie

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Creating a simulation facility in a single institution is not a simple feat. The political, logistical, and fiscal issues often mire a project down. Now, magnify that to not just one institution, but an entire state. The need for simulation-based education is widespread. However, it is the need for infrastructure and operational expertise that far outstrips the supply of money or manufactured simulation devices. The statewide approach is not magical, but is just a means to an end. It is a method that will be applicable to some states but not others. It is a model that can be used locally or nationally-the concepts are remarkably similar, just the scope differs. However, the larger the scale, the greater the consequences and implications. It is commonly accepted that a functional team will outperform a single individual. The notion of a statewide implementation can take various forms, which may include a centralized governing structure. This is not absolute, and in fact may not be desirable. Models could include a body that acts as a resource to develop the infrastructure skill set required for maximal access to simulation in the state. There are a number of core elements that are critical to implementing clinical simulation at any scale: interested parties getting together; a common consensus and the need to develop a common goal; a more formal group is formed to act on the need and to develop a mechanism to meet the need and goal(s); and so on.

AB - Creating a simulation facility in a single institution is not a simple feat. The political, logistical, and fiscal issues often mire a project down. Now, magnify that to not just one institution, but an entire state. The need for simulation-based education is widespread. However, it is the need for infrastructure and operational expertise that far outstrips the supply of money or manufactured simulation devices. The statewide approach is not magical, but is just a means to an end. It is a method that will be applicable to some states but not others. It is a model that can be used locally or nationally-the concepts are remarkably similar, just the scope differs. However, the larger the scale, the greater the consequences and implications. It is commonly accepted that a functional team will outperform a single individual. The notion of a statewide implementation can take various forms, which may include a centralized governing structure. This is not absolute, and in fact may not be desirable. Models could include a body that acts as a resource to develop the infrastructure skill set required for maximal access to simulation in the state. There are a number of core elements that are critical to implementing clinical simulation at any scale: interested parties getting together; a common consensus and the need to develop a common goal; a more formal group is formed to act on the need and to develop a mechanism to meet the need and goal(s); and so on.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884432196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884432196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/B978-012372531-8.50057-1

DO - 10.1016/B978-012372531-8.50057-1

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780123725318

SP - 355

EP - 358

BT - Clinical Simulation

PB - Elsevier Inc.

ER -