State insurance commissioner actions against health maintenance organizations for denial of emergency care

K. W. Neely, Robert Norton, Terri Schmidt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. Concerns have emerged from two west coast communities that health maintenance organizations (HMOs) may deter their members from calling 911. One means of influence is retrospective denial of emergency department (ED) or emergency medical services (EMS) claims. The study objective was to systematically assess legal action taken to contest HMO denial of claims. Methods. Telephone survey of all state insurance commissioners (SICs). The specific question asked was: 'What actions, if any, have been taken by the Office of Insurance Commissioner since 1990 against HMOs for denying claims for emergency department care or care provided by paramedics after a person has called 911?' Each office was contacted at least three times. Results. Representatives from 49 states were interviewed. Three states (6%, Oregon, Texas, and Virginia) have taken formal action since 1990. Oregon fined two HMOs a total of $25,000 for inappropriate systematic claim denial of ED care. Texas fined one HMO $1,000,000 for similar practices. Virginia, with no authority to fine, has issued citations. No action had been taken for denying EMS claims. Thirty-eight states (78%) reported no formal actions. Eight (16%) state SICs could not easily retrieve these data and did not report. Fourteen (29%) representatives reported receiving these complaints. Most of these complaints were resolved without formal SIC action. Conclusions. Three health plans in two states received financial penalties for systematic denial of ED claims. A fourth was cited. This may underrepresent the true incidence of appealed ED and EMS claim denials. While complaints occurred in 29% of states, recent actions by SICs are relatively rare (6% of states). These results speak more to the extent systematic claim denials are discovered by SICs than to the true incidence of this practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-22
Number of pages4
JournalPrehospital Emergency Care
Volume3
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Health Maintenance Organizations
Emergency Medical Services
Insurance
Hospital Emergency Service
Allied Health Personnel
Incidence
Telephone
Health

Keywords

  • Denial of care
  • Emergency department
  • EMS
  • Health maintenance organizations
  • Insurance
  • Medicolegal
  • State insurance commissioner

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

State insurance commissioner actions against health maintenance organizations for denial of emergency care. / Neely, K. W.; Norton, Robert; Schmidt, Terri.

In: Prehospital Emergency Care, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1999, p. 19-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Neely, K. W. ; Norton, Robert ; Schmidt, Terri. / State insurance commissioner actions against health maintenance organizations for denial of emergency care. In: Prehospital Emergency Care. 1999 ; Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 19-22.
@article{6fbfae52c38b4f98a460f83cda4cea2d,
title = "State insurance commissioner actions against health maintenance organizations for denial of emergency care",
abstract = "Objective. Concerns have emerged from two west coast communities that health maintenance organizations (HMOs) may deter their members from calling 911. One means of influence is retrospective denial of emergency department (ED) or emergency medical services (EMS) claims. The study objective was to systematically assess legal action taken to contest HMO denial of claims. Methods. Telephone survey of all state insurance commissioners (SICs). The specific question asked was: 'What actions, if any, have been taken by the Office of Insurance Commissioner since 1990 against HMOs for denying claims for emergency department care or care provided by paramedics after a person has called 911?' Each office was contacted at least three times. Results. Representatives from 49 states were interviewed. Three states (6{\%}, Oregon, Texas, and Virginia) have taken formal action since 1990. Oregon fined two HMOs a total of $25,000 for inappropriate systematic claim denial of ED care. Texas fined one HMO $1,000,000 for similar practices. Virginia, with no authority to fine, has issued citations. No action had been taken for denying EMS claims. Thirty-eight states (78{\%}) reported no formal actions. Eight (16{\%}) state SICs could not easily retrieve these data and did not report. Fourteen (29{\%}) representatives reported receiving these complaints. Most of these complaints were resolved without formal SIC action. Conclusions. Three health plans in two states received financial penalties for systematic denial of ED claims. A fourth was cited. This may underrepresent the true incidence of appealed ED and EMS claim denials. While complaints occurred in 29{\%} of states, recent actions by SICs are relatively rare (6{\%} of states). These results speak more to the extent systematic claim denials are discovered by SICs than to the true incidence of this practice.",
keywords = "Denial of care, Emergency department, EMS, Health maintenance organizations, Insurance, Medicolegal, State insurance commissioner",
author = "Neely, {K. W.} and Robert Norton and Terri Schmidt",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "19--22",
journal = "Prehospital Emergency Care",
issn = "1090-3127",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - State insurance commissioner actions against health maintenance organizations for denial of emergency care

AU - Neely, K. W.

AU - Norton, Robert

AU - Schmidt, Terri

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Objective. Concerns have emerged from two west coast communities that health maintenance organizations (HMOs) may deter their members from calling 911. One means of influence is retrospective denial of emergency department (ED) or emergency medical services (EMS) claims. The study objective was to systematically assess legal action taken to contest HMO denial of claims. Methods. Telephone survey of all state insurance commissioners (SICs). The specific question asked was: 'What actions, if any, have been taken by the Office of Insurance Commissioner since 1990 against HMOs for denying claims for emergency department care or care provided by paramedics after a person has called 911?' Each office was contacted at least three times. Results. Representatives from 49 states were interviewed. Three states (6%, Oregon, Texas, and Virginia) have taken formal action since 1990. Oregon fined two HMOs a total of $25,000 for inappropriate systematic claim denial of ED care. Texas fined one HMO $1,000,000 for similar practices. Virginia, with no authority to fine, has issued citations. No action had been taken for denying EMS claims. Thirty-eight states (78%) reported no formal actions. Eight (16%) state SICs could not easily retrieve these data and did not report. Fourteen (29%) representatives reported receiving these complaints. Most of these complaints were resolved without formal SIC action. Conclusions. Three health plans in two states received financial penalties for systematic denial of ED claims. A fourth was cited. This may underrepresent the true incidence of appealed ED and EMS claim denials. While complaints occurred in 29% of states, recent actions by SICs are relatively rare (6% of states). These results speak more to the extent systematic claim denials are discovered by SICs than to the true incidence of this practice.

AB - Objective. Concerns have emerged from two west coast communities that health maintenance organizations (HMOs) may deter their members from calling 911. One means of influence is retrospective denial of emergency department (ED) or emergency medical services (EMS) claims. The study objective was to systematically assess legal action taken to contest HMO denial of claims. Methods. Telephone survey of all state insurance commissioners (SICs). The specific question asked was: 'What actions, if any, have been taken by the Office of Insurance Commissioner since 1990 against HMOs for denying claims for emergency department care or care provided by paramedics after a person has called 911?' Each office was contacted at least three times. Results. Representatives from 49 states were interviewed. Three states (6%, Oregon, Texas, and Virginia) have taken formal action since 1990. Oregon fined two HMOs a total of $25,000 for inappropriate systematic claim denial of ED care. Texas fined one HMO $1,000,000 for similar practices. Virginia, with no authority to fine, has issued citations. No action had been taken for denying EMS claims. Thirty-eight states (78%) reported no formal actions. Eight (16%) state SICs could not easily retrieve these data and did not report. Fourteen (29%) representatives reported receiving these complaints. Most of these complaints were resolved without formal SIC action. Conclusions. Three health plans in two states received financial penalties for systematic denial of ED claims. A fourth was cited. This may underrepresent the true incidence of appealed ED and EMS claim denials. While complaints occurred in 29% of states, recent actions by SICs are relatively rare (6% of states). These results speak more to the extent systematic claim denials are discovered by SICs than to the true incidence of this practice.

KW - Denial of care

KW - Emergency department

KW - EMS

KW - Health maintenance organizations

KW - Insurance

KW - Medicolegal

KW - State insurance commissioner

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032923206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032923206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 19

EP - 22

JO - Prehospital Emergency Care

JF - Prehospital Emergency Care

SN - 1090-3127

IS - 1

ER -