Standing on the shoulders of giants: Results from the Radiation Oncology Academic Development and Mentorship Assessment Project (ROADMAP)

Emma B. Holliday, Reshma Jagsi, Charles Thomas, Lynn D. Wilson, Clifton D. Fuller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose To analyze survey information regarding mentorship practices and cross-correlate the results with objective metrics of academic productivity among academic radiation oncologists at US Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited residency training programs. Methods and Materials An institutional review board-approved survey for the Radiation Oncology Academic Development and Mentorship Assessment Project (ROADMAP) was sent to 1031 radiation oncologists employed at an ACGME-accredited residency training program and administered using an international secure web application designed exclusively to support data capture for research studies. Data collected included demographics, presence of mentorship, and the nature of specific mentoring activities. Productivity metrics, including number of publications, number of citations, h-index, and date of first publication, were collected for each survey respondent from a commercially available online database, and m-index was calculated. Results A total of 158 academic radiation oncologists completed the survey, 96 of whom reported having an academic/scientific mentor. Faculty with a mentor had higher numbers of publications, citations, and h- and m-indices. Differences in gender and race/ethnicity were not associated with significant differences in mentorship rates, but those with a mentor were more likely to have a PhD degree and were more likely to have more time protected for research. Bivariate fit regression modeling showed a positive correlation between a mentor's h-index and their mentee's h-index (R2 = 0.16; P

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)18-24
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume88
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Radiation Oncology
Mentors
shoulders
education
radiation
productivity
Graduate Medical Education
Publications
Accreditation
Internship and Residency
regression analysis
Education
Research Ethics Committees
Research
Demography
Surveys and Questionnaires
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiation
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Standing on the shoulders of giants : Results from the Radiation Oncology Academic Development and Mentorship Assessment Project (ROADMAP). / Holliday, Emma B.; Jagsi, Reshma; Thomas, Charles; Wilson, Lynn D.; Fuller, Clifton D.

In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, Vol. 88, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 18-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{82751391c60b40ccbe3a247856b02526,
title = "Standing on the shoulders of giants: Results from the Radiation Oncology Academic Development and Mentorship Assessment Project (ROADMAP)",
abstract = "Purpose To analyze survey information regarding mentorship practices and cross-correlate the results with objective metrics of academic productivity among academic radiation oncologists at US Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited residency training programs. Methods and Materials An institutional review board-approved survey for the Radiation Oncology Academic Development and Mentorship Assessment Project (ROADMAP) was sent to 1031 radiation oncologists employed at an ACGME-accredited residency training program and administered using an international secure web application designed exclusively to support data capture for research studies. Data collected included demographics, presence of mentorship, and the nature of specific mentoring activities. Productivity metrics, including number of publications, number of citations, h-index, and date of first publication, were collected for each survey respondent from a commercially available online database, and m-index was calculated. Results A total of 158 academic radiation oncologists completed the survey, 96 of whom reported having an academic/scientific mentor. Faculty with a mentor had higher numbers of publications, citations, and h- and m-indices. Differences in gender and race/ethnicity were not associated with significant differences in mentorship rates, but those with a mentor were more likely to have a PhD degree and were more likely to have more time protected for research. Bivariate fit regression modeling showed a positive correlation between a mentor's h-index and their mentee's h-index (R2 = 0.16; P",
author = "Holliday, {Emma B.} and Reshma Jagsi and Charles Thomas and Wilson, {Lynn D.} and Fuller, {Clifton D.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.09.035",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "18--24",
journal = "International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics",
issn = "0360-3016",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Standing on the shoulders of giants

T2 - Results from the Radiation Oncology Academic Development and Mentorship Assessment Project (ROADMAP)

AU - Holliday, Emma B.

AU - Jagsi, Reshma

AU - Thomas, Charles

AU - Wilson, Lynn D.

AU - Fuller, Clifton D.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Purpose To analyze survey information regarding mentorship practices and cross-correlate the results with objective metrics of academic productivity among academic radiation oncologists at US Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited residency training programs. Methods and Materials An institutional review board-approved survey for the Radiation Oncology Academic Development and Mentorship Assessment Project (ROADMAP) was sent to 1031 radiation oncologists employed at an ACGME-accredited residency training program and administered using an international secure web application designed exclusively to support data capture for research studies. Data collected included demographics, presence of mentorship, and the nature of specific mentoring activities. Productivity metrics, including number of publications, number of citations, h-index, and date of first publication, were collected for each survey respondent from a commercially available online database, and m-index was calculated. Results A total of 158 academic radiation oncologists completed the survey, 96 of whom reported having an academic/scientific mentor. Faculty with a mentor had higher numbers of publications, citations, and h- and m-indices. Differences in gender and race/ethnicity were not associated with significant differences in mentorship rates, but those with a mentor were more likely to have a PhD degree and were more likely to have more time protected for research. Bivariate fit regression modeling showed a positive correlation between a mentor's h-index and their mentee's h-index (R2 = 0.16; P

AB - Purpose To analyze survey information regarding mentorship practices and cross-correlate the results with objective metrics of academic productivity among academic radiation oncologists at US Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited residency training programs. Methods and Materials An institutional review board-approved survey for the Radiation Oncology Academic Development and Mentorship Assessment Project (ROADMAP) was sent to 1031 radiation oncologists employed at an ACGME-accredited residency training program and administered using an international secure web application designed exclusively to support data capture for research studies. Data collected included demographics, presence of mentorship, and the nature of specific mentoring activities. Productivity metrics, including number of publications, number of citations, h-index, and date of first publication, were collected for each survey respondent from a commercially available online database, and m-index was calculated. Results A total of 158 academic radiation oncologists completed the survey, 96 of whom reported having an academic/scientific mentor. Faculty with a mentor had higher numbers of publications, citations, and h- and m-indices. Differences in gender and race/ethnicity were not associated with significant differences in mentorship rates, but those with a mentor were more likely to have a PhD degree and were more likely to have more time protected for research. Bivariate fit regression modeling showed a positive correlation between a mentor's h-index and their mentee's h-index (R2 = 0.16; P

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890443420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890443420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.09.035

DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.09.035

M3 - Article

C2 - 24210670

AN - SCOPUS:84890443420

VL - 88

SP - 18

EP - 24

JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

SN - 0360-3016

IS - 1

ER -