Stability of proximal femoral grafts in canine hip arthroplasty

John P. Heiner, Sean S. Kohles, Paul A. Manley, Ray Vanderby, Mark D. Markel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

In a canine model, the fixation stability of a prosthesis and proximal bone graft composite were measured relative to the distal femur. One group had the prosthesis graft composite cemented into the distal femur. The second group had the prosthesis graft composite press fit into the distal femur for biologic ingrowth. Displacements of the proximal femoral grafts relative to the host hone in each group were measured after ex vivo (acute with graft) implantation and 4 months after implantation. A third group with no osteotomy (acute intact) simulated perfect graft to host bone union. Relative displacements representing 6°freedom (translation and rotation) were calculated from the displacement values measured by 9 eddy current transducers. Measurements of displacement were used to test the hypothesis that distal press fit fixation equals distal cement fixation at 4 months after implantation. In all cases the measured translations and rotations of the graft to implant construct were small and of a magnitude that should encourage bone ingrowth (<0.05 mm and <0.1°, respectively). The stability of the press fit group at 4 months was not significantly different from the cemented group in axial and transverse displacement during axial and transverse loading, respectively. There was no difference in stabilities at 4 months between distal press fit and cemented fixation in hip replacements requiring a proximal femoral graft.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)233-240
Number of pages8
JournalClinical orthopaedics and related research
Issue number341
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1997

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Stability of proximal femoral grafts in canine hip arthroplasty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this